Twitter Discussion [Archive]
- Thread starter Damien
- Start date
- Status
I remember someone posting stats of the percentage of gossip per newspaper that turned out to be right and theI dont think any paper was ever more than 30% accurate. But there is serious potential for the clean up of tweets being posted. Some no mark ITKs getting posted jsut because they mention Vidal in their tweet.
The politics of that club are just ridiculous.
People seem to want to ban journos because they don't like them, or because they share views that they don't agree with. Getting a bit silly now.
Should be right now.
Castles is in it to wind United fans up and shit stir. Why should we promote his shit? cnut can feck off.
The time is only 4:15pm in Portugal, so theres another 45 mins to go yet
Oh, my mistake.
I'm rather skeptical whether it'll happen personally. I can't see them allowing Nani to be unveiled when we've not even confirmed Rojo yet?
Makes no sense at all as to why that would happen
With the sheer amount of shite they post on a daily basis, I find that number very hard to believe.
Are you sure it wasn't 3%?
Because they're separate deals?
Because he's an actual journo and just because people might not like their news, doesn't mean it's not true.
The only people who should be banned are people like indyKalia... People who are clearly just making stuff up on the spot. Even people like tancredi is harsh to ban them, because they are real journalists/reporters and though he's annoying, he does get things right now and then but mostly just says what he hears.
I thought Nani was included as part of the Rojo deal, loan deal provided we pay his wages?
Then again, theres so much crap flying about, who knows what to believe
30% was for the respectable broadsheets who dont speculate half as much. The red tops were around the 10% mark or so.
Woodward probably thought he'd give them nani in good faith and now they're fecking him over. Would it surprise anyone?
That sounds about right. Though I would remove the '0' for the Daily Star.
In all honesty... not in the slightest
can you imagine if that happens.According to most of these reports, there's always nothing/no offer from United. Maybe we just enjoyed being linked with players.
Have you looked through his feed recently? Any 'real journalist' who insists on snide comments clearly has an agenda and should generally feck off.
So Castles was right?
What are we playing at regarding Vidal?
I do find it odd the amount of players we've been linked to this summer where it's been noted that there has been sweet F.A. regarding what we're doing about them. No offers/no contact etc etc.
It's that odd, I'm having a hard time believing that we could be that stupid.
Its not stupid if it comes off. Madrid have replaced Di Maria before they've actually sold him and the other main competitior doesnt look like being able to get a deal done. While the club needs to act quickly to bring players in, those in charge wont want to pay over the odds for fear of looking like a soft touch and seeing prices get hiked - either in the last few weeks of this window or later on.
If the club are seen to blow £70 plus million on one player this week, that'll add significant sums to other players they might want to bring in next week.
Its high risk, for certain and if it doesnt come off then Woodward, in particular will be the man who's neck is on the line in terms of the fans opinions of him.
nothing so far
Who is Donkey Castles?
That's the problem.
Who gives a shite if someone doesn't like the club you support? Does it really matter that much to you? Isn't hard to just ignore it.
This is depressing.
Rojo is coming lads chill out. We are just waiting to announce him along with Vidal and Di Maria.
Snap.
The hypocrisy, its about the same as you spending the time to reply to me, wasn't it easier to just ignore me? Why do you give a shire about what I say...
Nani has to be confirmed before we can announce Rojo, patience...
Huh?
- Status