And you are blinded by your biased opinion.
Not worth discussing indeed.
Why not, when these players are brought to a similar level of coaching, their level clearly drops, and they are look just as hesitant and frustrating as the rest.
Of course there are variable, you are the one trying to compare us to City to validate your hyperbolic opinion that we have so little to no talent, that we can't even play like a functioning team and all of this is down to players.
Rashford is a winger, he has played there for most of his career, and that is a fact irrespective of your personal description of what a winger means. Same for Greenwood.
Not many, and if you think that is an example of good wing play then again that is your description of a winger, not the factual one.
They do it with co-ordinated play and creating space and working as a team, they don't rely on some fixed winger to do it. They do this regardless of who plays, so not really down to some mystical winger doing that.
We crossed the ball a few times, and we also worked the channels and got behind them a couple of times. The problem was not that and has not been that, the problem has been the slow tempo, lack of energy and the lack of chemistry and cohesion in the team. No matter who has played, that has been a constant.
More hyperbolic nonsense.
They are no more intelligent than our players, they are just better coached and are far more functioning as a team. Those same players look just as brainless as our players when they are not playing for their clubs. There are certainly managers out there who can sort them out, and we do not and should not need any replacements to play as a functioning team.
If you think that simply buying new players will magically solve all our problems then you are in for rude awakening. Not like we have not tried it before, every player that plays well at other teams just magically turns crap when they get here, wonder why that is ?