Trump/Russia/SDNY investigation
- Thread starter Raoul
- Start date
I'm about 2/3's of the way through the senate transcript so far, and my main takeaway is that Chief Investigative Counsel Jason Foster is a massive cnut.
Oh boy..
Why are people still hyped by this? I doubt this will lead to anywhere close to impeachment.
Why are we hyped by ever increasing evidence that the President of the USA could well be a criminal? Gee, I dunno..
Erm. What?
You're probably right. I'm still hyped because I want to know the truth, to the extent that its discovered by Mueller and revealed to the public.
It would never come to that. His surrogates will take the fall. Junior and Jared will be on the firing line at best.
But if there is conclusive against TRUMP then how they will they take the fall for him?
Him being charged with crimes and him being a criminal aren't the same thing. Even if the whole thing gets whitewashed, I still want to know the truth if possible. I don't disagree with you btw, I'd say there's probably not more than a minute chance that he ever sees a courtroom. Either he'll get pardoned by his successor or the Democrats will let him off the hook like normal.
Richard Nixon never was convicted of anything. I'd say it was kind of a big deal.
Wonder how long it would have took for all this come out if it wasnt for Papadoupoulos and his drunken escapades.
Come on, whether Trump is innocent or not, this is pretty gripping stuff, the likes of which hasn't been seen since Watergate and with a cast of characters that the HBO writers couldn't come up with. I'm sure you can understand the fascination.
It was a much different political climate surrounding Congress then.
Impeachment is a political matter after all, not a criminal one.
Pelosi's responses when asked about potential impeachment are not encouraging.
This.
It's the Kushner!
I'd hope that others will do like Feinstein today and release information where possible to head off the lies and obfuscation. Then public pressure might force some action. While conservatives look willing to back Trump no matter what, they'll pay attention to polls and hopefully let that drive them even where they lack any kind of moral compass
I just dropped back into this thread to respond to this and I'm out again.
Je
And what has that got to do with the Russia investigation?
Seriously, you don't help yourself at all really. It's like you ignore everything and just post your own thoughts, often without reading or understanding anything about the topic you are responding to.
I'm seriously at a loss as to why you would post that in here then back out again? Also, saying shit like that is just extremely childish.
And what has that got to do with the Russia investigation?
Seriously, you don't help yourself at all really. It's like you ignore everything and just post your own thoughts, often without reading or understanding anything about the topic you are responding to.
I'm seriously at a loss as to why you would post that in here then back out again? Also, saying shit like that is just extremely childish.
He has to run out his Mum's basement to shout 'lock her up!' to who's ever awake now. Busy guy.
Did you see what I was responding to?
The best TV series ever!
I'm actually going to block you now. Seriously. That's the worst post I've seen for ages and I've been reading what denisirwin has been posting. Also, no gifs in the CE forum. If I was a mod I would have temped you for that shit.
He was answering a direct question about Hilary and terrorism.
Yeah, fair enough. For some reason the message he was replying to/quoting didn't show up on my phone. Actually it still doesn't
It appears I seem to have blocked loads of people by accident while using my phone since my laptop died. So apologies @DenisIrwin.
He was indeed. It's interesting that he takes the time to respond to that comment but nothing else that's been presented to him in this thread.
As for his declaration that Hillary was "scheming with terrorists" (his words) the out of context screenshot from Wikileaks that he provided in no way backs up his claim.
I would normally take the time to explain the context of that e-mail to him but a) this is all way off-topic and b) he's already proven that when the facts are inconvenient he clams up and does a runner.
feck this shit. Look. I am not into discussing this conspiracy theory. That's all. Go on and discuss your theory about this conspiracy all you want. Knock yourselves out. I said I don't want to participate in this thread but I can't stand back and allow personal attacks on me, led by a fecking administrator FFS, to go on ad infinitum.
Unless I've missed something nobody is attacking you personally; however critiquing the content of your posts and your general approach to debate is well within reason, like with everyone else on here.
Whats your issue exactly? You didnt respond to my previous posts.
Just leave me out of this discussion. That's all. Go ahead and discuss the subject all you want.
You say conspiracy theory as if this is in the same category as 9/11 truthers or flat earthers. This is a subject that is being investigated at the highest level with several charges already having been served.
You can't just decry it as bullshit with absolutely no basis, ignore all evidence shown to you and then bitch and moan when people pull you up on it.