Transgender Athletes

Are they perfectly happy? How did they determined that they needed or wanted to transition? We are talking about 8 to 13 years old kids.

I'll be honest with you, I didn't know who I was or what I was at that age and it would have been madness to let me do something that is that life altering.

Im pretty sure I thought I was a Power Ranger or a Hero Turtle, to fecking long ago I forgot.
 
Oh yeah? I welcome you to quote where I literally said to exclude them from participating in sports. Competing against males =/= exclusion, last I checked.

Original comment: Sports are inherently a meritocracy and exclusionary.

Your response: But school sports should not be.

So what are tryouts and cuts other than meritocracy and exclusion?

How do school sports work in the US? Surely you have teams for everyone? B and C teams etc? Or do kids only play for the A team or not at all?
 
Oh yeah? I welcome you to quote where I literally said to exclude them from participating in sports.

No need for that, let's clarify it right now. Should teenage transgender girls be able to complete in girls sports in school? Yes or no?

Original comment: Sports are inherently a meritocracy and exclusionary.

Your response: But school sports should not be.

So what are tryouts and cuts other than meritocracy and exclusion?

If you don't see the difference between telling a kid they failed at a goal and that's why they can't get in or telling a kid he can't get in because of who they are, then I guess that's that.
 
How do school sports work in the US? Surely you have teams for everyone? B and C teams etc? Or do kids only play for the A team or not at all?
Depends on the size of the school and participation level within the sport... but generally, yes, there is a Varsity team, fed by a JV team, fed by a C team, fed by a D team. Smaller schools might only have a Varsity or Varsity & JV while large schools might have all 4.
 
What do you mean an example? There are literally millions of transgender kids who want to play sports.

Yeah, let's introduce a teenage girl to sports by competing with boys and sharing locker rooms with them. What could possibly go wrong.

Have they been diagnosed? Do you even comprehend how big a surgery is? This isn’t a case of having a hair cut mate, at some stage we need to look after our children, proper diagnosis, proper care and yes if it’s found they NEED transition, do it. It’s not a fecking raffle. We are doing more and more of no care, pop a pill and see you after school.

if you are born a different sex than that you identify with, there is a problem. That doesn’t mean there is anything wrong with them but if we take that as a *normal* thing we are letting ourselves down as a society.
 
No need for that, let's clarify it right now. Should teenage transgender girls be able to complete in girls sports in school? Yes or no?
No, they should participate by competing for the male teams.

The same thing, by the way, that girls have had to do before a team got enough participation for a full squad.
If you don't see the difference between telling a kid they failed at a goal and that's why they can't get in or telling a kid he can't get in because of who they are, then I guess that's that.
If you don't see that you're being completely hypocritical and moving the goal posts regarding what's meritocratic and exclusionary, then I guess that's that.
 
Have they been diagnosed? Do you even comprehend how big a surgery is? This isn’t a case of having a hair cut mate, at some stage we need to look after our children, proper diagnosis, proper care and yes if it’s found they NEED transition, do it. It’s not a fecking raffle. We are doing more and more of no care, pop a pill and see you after school.
Mate, I just said these kids aren't undergoing surgery, just stuff like puberty blockers that can be reversed later on if necessary. What are you on about?
 
No, they should participate by competing for the male teams.

The same thing, by the way, that girls have had to do before a team got enough participation for a full squad.

If you don't see that you're being completely hypocritical and moving the goal posts regarding what's meritocratic and exclusionary, then I guess that's that.

We know full well the girls will never accept sharing locker rooms with boys or the humiliation of having other decide who they are so yeah, you can pretend all you want you're giving them a choice, but you know you're not. That's even worse then outright denying it.

So talk about hypocritical I guess...
 
Mate, I just said these kids aren't undergoing surgery, just stuff like puberty blockers that can be reversed later on if necessary. What are you on about?

really? You dont it’s ok to block, u block puberty and not see any problems? I’ve been on anxiety meds for 5 years and honestly they feck you right up; no hormones involved.
 
We know full well the girls will never accept sharing locker rooms with boys or the humiliation of having other decide who they are so yeah, you can pretend all you want you're giving them a choice, but you know you're not. That's even worse then outright denying it.

So talk about hypocritical I guess...

what about the boys?
 
Yes, they are. Last Week Tonight did a show about this recently, you should give it a watch, it's brilliant seeing those kids so happy because they're allowed to be who they are.

Nothing is done to these kids that can't be reverted later, we're talking about puberty blockers mostly, not surgery or other permanent alterations.

That part isn't true. The reality of the matter is that we don't know how puberty blockers affect kids and we don't know if the potential effects are reversible. We are using actual kids as guinea pigs.

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/gender-dysphoria/treatment/

Puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones
Puberty blockers (gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues) pause the physical changes of puberty, such as breast development or facial hair.

Little is known about the long-term side effects of hormone or puberty blockers in children with gender dysphoria.

Although GIDS advises this is a physically reversible treatment if stopped, it is not known what the psychological effects may be.

It's also not known whether hormone blockers affect the development of the teenage brain or children's bones. Side effects may also include hot flushes, fatigue and mood alterations.

From the age of 16, teenagers who've been on hormone blockers for at least 12 months may be given cross-sex hormones, also known as gender-affirming hormones.

These hormones cause some irreversible changes, such as:

breast development (caused by taking oestrogen)
breaking or deepening of the voice (caused by taking testosterone)
Long-term cross-sex hormone treatment may cause temporary or even permanent infertility.

However, as cross-sex hormones affect people differently, they should not be considered a reliable form of contraception.

There is some uncertainty about the risks of long-term cross-sex hormone treatment.

Transition to adult gender identity services
Young people aged 17 or older may be seen in an adult gender identity clinic or be referred to one from GIDS.

By this age, a teenager and the clinic team may be more confident about confirming a diagnosis of gender dysphoria. If desired, steps can be taken to more permanent treatments that fit with the chosen gender identity or as non-binary.
 
really? You honk it’s ok to block, u block puberty and not see any problems?
It's what the kids what, it helps their mental health, and if they decide later on they fecked up, it is reversed. I see no problem in that. These things are followed by professionals, kids don't do it on their living room if they're bored because the wifi is off.
 
It's what the kids what, it helps their mental health, and if they decide later on they fecked up, it is reversed. I see no problem in that. These things are followed by professionals, kids don't do it on their living room if they're bored because the wifi is off.

My 2 kids want cola ice pops one day and strawberry the next day, I’m their dad, it’s my responsibility to say feck off and leave me alone.
 
That part isn't true. The reality of the matter is that we don't know how puberty blockers affect kids and we don't know if the potential effects are reversible. We are using actual kids as guinea pigs.

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/gender-dysphoria/treatment/
I'm not a doctor, so I won't get into this debate in any serious way. I don't have the knowledge for it. Plenty of places say they are reversible, but anyway.

They work as a treatment that probably saves countless lives.
 
My 2 kids want cola ice pops one day and strawberry the next day, I’m their dad, it’s my responsibility to say feck off and leave me alone.
I'm sure plenty of parents of kids who committed suicide over this are really happy they had your mindset.
 
Massive advantage? The most recent studies seem to show when kids transition very young, before starting high school sports, the advantages are minimal or nonexistent, depending on the sport. So why exclude this hypothetical girl from something as important as sports because of something so insignificant? I repeat, this is not the olympics we're talking about, it's high school volleyball.

So not to run away from your question, even if this would give her an advantage, yes, I would still want her to play.

Now you, are you ready to tell me you would deprive millions of kids from playing sports because of this small or nonexistent advantage? Just be honest mate.
So - for argument's sake, you would have no issue if a school authority made a wheelchair bound female basketball team play against an able bodied female team?
 
trans and cis women are both women.

there is a difference between a blonde-haired woman and a brunette, but they're still both women.

hope this helps.
Says who?
And again, they might be both women with regard to gender, but not necessarily in a biological sense.
 
Wow, really, tell me more?

I keep repeating myself, I wonder if people replying to me are actually reading my posts...

School sports are about inclusion, team spirit and friendship. Telling a young kid "hey, you can't join our team because of who you are, so go look for sports elsewhere" is the opposite of what school sports should be.

Of course if you only look at it as being about competition, winning and getting future advantages, and for that you're willing to feck millions of kids over, then just come out and say it.

You don't seem to have a firm grasp on school sports then. There is a mix of competitive and recreational sports in schools.

You keep repeating that there will be no options for these children to take part in any sporting activity, but this is blatantly false when recreational sport (and mandatory physical education) will always be there. I'd wager the majority of any cohort do not participate in competitive sports inside or outside of their school environment.

Competitive sports (including those in schools) will always be at least somewhat exclusionary. Interest in a sport is not enough to necessitate an individual's participation in a competitive version of it.

Additionally, there are plenty of schools where, for a variety of reasons (including a lack of numbers), certain sports are simply not on the table for their pupils.

It's not perfect, but these things seldom are.

Anecdotally, my primary school used to beg boys to take part in netball because not enough girls were interested to even run proper practice sessions, let alone play competitively against other schools.

There were also girls (in my opinion, unfairly) "banned" from playing football after a certain age because it was no longer considered safe for them to play with boys, but a severe lack of girls teams in the area meant either quitting or travelling an obscene distance to find a new team, unless they were talented enough to be picked up by a proper academy.

I have a reasonable amount of experience with junior football coaching, and particularly in the younger age groups, almost every club is well oversubscribed in terms of interest versus the number of available spaces on each team, and this includes clubs with as many as six teams in an age category. These clubs will be almost guaranteed to see a fall in interest and participation as the teams progress through the age groups, and despite a wealth of interested parents/children at the start, there will not be a replacement rate of new participants as the years go by. This, coupled with playing-squad numbers increasing through the age categories until they reach 11-a-side will often mean teams "merging" and in a lot of these cases, some children will be "cut" from the team. However, this doesn't stop these children from playing in a recreational capacity.

Simply put, not all school or junior sports are about "inclusion, team spirit and friendship". They will be a core principle behind a lot of junior sports, but will not be at the forefront of competitive junior sports, where fairness of competition will be far more of a concern.
 
Where do you get your information from about this topic? Care to share some links?

America in particular, feed their kids pills. Bad behaviour, give them a pill.

We are now saying to a boy, *oh u are a girl, ok I will go get the knife*

Can’t concentrate, pill. Our kids are OUR kids, yes I have no doubt mixed up gender is real but surgery at 10 or 11…. feck me it’s barbaric.
 
America in particular, feed their kids pills. Bad behaviour, give them a pill. Can’t concentrate, pill. Our kids are OUR kids, yes I have no doubt mixed up gender is real but surgery at 10 or 11…. feck me it’s barbaric.
So no links then?
 
I'm not a doctor, so I won't get into this debate in any serious way. I don't have the knowledge for it. Plenty of places say they are reversible, but anyway.

They work as a treatment that probably saves countless lives.

Sorry to double quote you, but you've definitely referenced "plenty of studies" without actually providing any sources for these for some of your claims around puberty blockers and other related issues.

I'm interested in seeing these because my understanding is that there is a severe lack of studies on these issues and it's one of the major talking points for those opposed to children being medicalised too soon. One of the biggest criticisms and something that is essentially a scandal surrounding the UK's Tavistock Clinic is a lack of record keeping and a lack of supporting studies for the medical pathways they've been placing children on.
 
You don't seem to have a firm grasp on school sports then. There is a mix of competitive and recreational sports in schools.

You keep repeating that there will be no options for these children to take part in any sporting activity, but this is blatantly false when recreational sport (and mandatory physical education) will always be there. I'd wager the majority of any cohort do not participate in competitive sports inside or outside of their school environment.

Competitive sports (including those in schools) will always be at least somewhat exclusionary. Interest in a sport is not enough to necessitate an individual's participation in a competitive version of it.

Additionally, there are plenty of schools where, for a variety of reasons (including a lack of numbers), certain sports are simply not on the table for their pupils.

It's not perfect, but these things seldom are.

Anecdotally, my primary school used to beg boys to take part in netball because not enough girls were interested to even run proper practice sessions, let alone play competitively against other schools.

There were also girls (in my opinion, unfairly) "banned" from playing football after a certain age because it was no longer considered safe for them to play with boys, but a severe lack of girls teams in the area meant either quitting or travelling an obscene distance to find a new team, unless they were talented enough to be picked up by a proper academy.

I have a reasonable amount of experience with junior football coaching, and particularly in the younger age groups, almost every club is well oversubscribed in terms of interest versus the number of available spaces on each team, and this includes clubs with as many as six teams in an age category. These clubs will be almost guaranteed to see a fall in interest and participation as the teams progress through the age groups, and despite a wealth of interested parents/children at the start, there will not be a replacement rate of new participants as the years go by. This, coupled with playing-squad numbers increasing through the age categories until they reach 11-a-side will often mean teams "merging" and in a lot of these cases, some children will be "cut" from the team. However, this doesn't stop these children from playing in a recreational capacity.

Simply put, not all school or junior sports are about "inclusion, team spirit and friendship". They will be a core principle behind a lot of junior sports, but will not be at the forefront of competitive junior sports, where fairness of competition will be far more of a concern.

Do you think excluding a kid because he's not good enough is the same as excluding a kid because of who they are? I mean, that's the crux of the matter.

I'm not arguing a kid banned from the school team will never be able to play sports again, I'm saying it's cruel to ban people based on who they are and it goes against what I believe should be the goals of sports in school.
 
Shit they wanted bubblegum?
Very sad trolling on such a serious topic, especially to a post talking about children killing themselves. Anyway, you're a spurs fan, so I guess you're already being punished.
 
I'm asking based off of this discussion:
A question from an obvious troll? Really?

OK I will pretend you're really dumb for a minute. No, mate, having girls in wheelchairs competing against girls who are not on wheelchairs shouldn't happen. Sigh...
 
Are we suggesting that it's normal or desirable for kids between the age of 8 and 13, to transition?

That's a really cool point!
They're too young to transition in any way and also if they don't transition that young, their growing advantages will stop them playing competitive sport.

695811.jpg
 
Very sad trolling on such a serious topic, especially to a post talking about children killing themselves. Anyway, you're a spurs fan, so I guess you're already being punished.

If you have a child you know what they fell, it’s in you, even miles away you know. My kids are happy and if they needed to talk to me i would discuss it openly without any sign or feelinf of shame. You are posting like we shouldn’t have a discussion or understanding. You come across that this should be a normal thing to happen to a child. A kid wanting to transgender isn’t normal, but that doesn’t mean it’s a bad thing, but u need to understand we aren’t talking about changing a car here.
 
If you have a child you know what they fell, it’s in you, even miles away you know. My kids are happy and if they needed to talk to me i would discuss it openly without any sign or feelinf of shame. You are posting like we shouldn’t have a discussion or understanding. You come across that this should be a normal thing to happen to a child.
You're trolling, so I'm not replying to you anymore.
 
A question from an obvious troll? Really?

OK I will pretend you're really dumb for a minute. No, mate, having girls in wheelchairs competing against girls who are not on wheelchairs shouldn't happen. Sigh...
An obvious troll? I've literally never interacted with that poster on the forum before so whether he's a troll or not, it'll go over my head.

I'm assuming you're saying no because of the inherent advantage a person has over someone wheelchair bound in a game such as basketball. This same logic can be extrapolated to trans women in women sports re: there are inherent differences you can't get away from.
 
You're trolling, so I'm not replying to you anymore.

Im certainly not, if my kid came to me and said I wanna change gender at 11, I said yes it’s on me if he comes back in 5 years and says why did you let me do that? I’m responsible for them till they are 18, you make it sound like an oil change
 
That's a really cool point!
They're too young to transition in any way and also if they don't transition that young, their growing advantages will stop them playing competitive sport.

695811.jpg

That's not a point but a question.
 
An obvious troll? I've literally never interacted with that poster on the forum before so whether he's a troll or not, it'll go over my head.

I'm assuming you're saying no because of the inherent advantage a person has over someone wheelchair bound in a game such as basketball. This same logic can be extrapolated to trans women in women sports re: there are inherent differences you can't get away from.
Just look at his posts in this last page of this thread. Pretty obvious, but I fell for it at first, so yeah...

I'm saying no because it would be impractical, not only because of the infrastructure necessary but also because the rules of the game are different. It would create a ridiculous scenario on the pitch with two teams playing two different sports.

Including a teenage transgender girl in a basketball team has nothing to do with the scenario you made up in your mind.