What the actual feck does any of this have to do with competing against biological women in athletic competition?
You can follow the discussion between myself and oates if you like. It’s literally only 3 posts between us.
What the actual feck does any of this have to do with competing against biological women in athletic competition?
Ok then, let’s start with some basics:
1. Are trans women women?
2. Do you think it’s OK for trans women to use women’s bathrooms?
3. Do you think it’s OK for trans women to use women’s changing rooms?
Are you acknowledging that it would be something worth considering/addressing if, for example, Hubbard's best was 340?
Currently your posts seem to indicate that you think this is all perfectly fine because the one trans athlete we have competing (that is 22 years older than the person you've just compared them to) is not guaranteed to win in this one event, but have not once acknowledged the valid concerns raised by others of the very possible scenario of trans athletes in their 20s wanting to compete when the obvious mitigating factor of age that Laurel Hubbard has with her performance will no longer be present.
Are we only permitted to believe there's a potential issue in the scenario of a trans competitior being guaranteed victory at the absolute pinnacle of elite sports, or is there, you know, some nuance to this?
Under current IOC guidance trans athletes have to suppress testosterone below a certain level for 1 year yet studies have shown "after suppressing their testosterone for two years – a year longer than IOC guidelines – they were still 12% faster on average than biological females. " That's over a distance of 1.5 miles, which is just over 2k. The closest Olympic track event is the 1500m, of which the current women's world record is 3:53.96. Shave 12% off that and it's 3:25.88. The men's world record is 3:26.00.
You can follow the discussion between myself and oates if you like. It’s literally only 3 posts between us.
If Hubbard's best was 340 then she'd be among the favorites to win, but obviously not guaranteed to win when another athlete has just done 335 and is extremely stable. So I'd take issue such statements there as well. If she regularly did 400+ then, yes, she'd be pretty much guaranteed to win barring injury or DQ, but even is she was guaranteed to win it still wouldn't be true to say that trans people are guaranteed to win, because normally they don't.
You are permitted to believe whatever you like, you don't even have to ask for my permission.
So you agree that there is a a potential issue there to be discussed?
Discuss away, but not with me.
Reverting to calling people transphobes already. Clearly you're here for a reasoned debate.
1. Yes
2. While I consider All women to be women it isn't my decision to make.
3. Same as for 2
Some women may take the view that a trans woman should have transitioned to a certain extent, this isn't my decision to answer for.
Personally I'm happy for any gender to use male bathrooms and male changing rooms, I doubt I'll be seeing any combination I've not seen before or feel threatened by, however women have expressed concern regarding males calling themselves trans-females but who are in fact not, I will not impose my will on any woman (All women are women).
What any of this has to do with your deliberate agenda of calling anyone who doesn't agree with you as regards Sports, transphobic, is beyond me.
Why do you keep getting involved if you don't want to be part of the discussion?
You can read the thread title.You can follow the discussion between myself and oates if you like. It’s literally only 3 posts between us.
Well of course now you are being offensive whilst I have been honest.Thanks for that cop out of an answer, which kinda proves my point. If you truly believe trans women are women, and trans women themselves want to use the bathroom of their identified gender, and the law in fact permits this, then the answers to 2 and 3 should be pretty straight forward.
I'd also suggest not labelling everyone who doesn't think there is a simple answer, either your simple answer or other's different simple answers, as transphobes and ableists. And are you saying that transgender/intersex people are disabled? I wouldn't have assumed you would have thought so from your posts.
You’ll have to forgive me if I can’t find this supposed instance where I called people transphobes. It’s almost like you think it’s in the post you just quoted.
Thanks for that cop out of an answer, which kinda proves my point. If you truly believe trans women are women, and trans women themselves want to use the bathroom of their identified gender, and the law in fact permits this, then the answers to 2 and 3 should be pretty straight forward.
Ok then, let’s start with some basics:
1. Are trans women women?
2. Do you think it’s OK for trans women to use women’s bathrooms?
3. Do you think it’s OK for trans women to use women’s changing rooms?
Reported.He's definitely sympathetic to transphobic views from that post.
Reported.
.
I said transitioning is a choice, meaning undertaking surgeries and hormone treatments, because it very much is. You even used the phrase "fully transitioned yourself" earlier, so I'm not sure what confusion you're having here.
You've proven repeatedly that you have no intention to debate sensibly and offer any arguments based on material reality, instead opting for disingenuous, indignant rightousness.
Also, I thought you were done here?
I'm always honest about my actions, particularly in this case where a discussion is being bogged down by constant accusations without foundations while posters who have a lot of empathy are being turned off the topic by posters such as yourself and @Septic simply because you don't feel your every dictat is agreed with.You're showing sympathy to well documented transphobic fear mongering about bathrooms so report away. You don't need to tell me that you reported me for it to count though.
Why do I mention this? Basically your first question. Are trans women women? On the face if it I would say yes definitely. However on closer inspection would I date a transgender woman? Would another on here? If not why? Is it because despite saying yes to your question they don't fully accept?
I'm always honest about my actions, particularly in this case where a discussion is being bogged down by constant accusations without foundations while posters who have a lot of empathy are being turned off the topic by posters such as yourself and @Septic simply because you don't feel your every dictat is agreed with.
I don't care what you think about my sympathies because I know that I view all women as women, I simply recognise that there are issues that it is not my place to demand how they are solved, however you continue to spoil any free discussion on this thread.
What?Mixed race?
I don't think you are going to succeed in bullying anyone to your views on a thread with strong and fair minded posters but you do continue to deliberately spoil the thread for those wishing to join and maybe be a part of solution making while recognising the issues.Thats why I'm saying you are sympathetic to views because you literally are showing sympathy towards them.
FYI I'm a woman who apparently have lived a privileged life and shouldn't expect equality and fairness because I was born lucky.
I don't think you are going to succeed in bullying anyone to your views on a thread with strong and fair minded posters but you do continue to deliberately spoil the thread for those wishing to join and maybe be a part of solution making while recognising the issues.
I won't accept your personal allegations because you are merely parroting the same thing over and over without any proof. I have stated honestly that I see all women as being women, at the same time I will not impose my views on women and that is empathy for all women, not what you accuse me of.
Again, I've reported your post.
What?
Yeah, no. Either speak your mind or don’t talk.Sorry that was my autocorrect. Meant to say mostly right.
Yeah, no. Either speak your mind or don’t talk.
You typed mixed race, so… what?
Sure it did.Lome I told you my autocorrect did it.
Personally I didn't disagree with anything said regarding your 'context'. I'm afraid I have to wonder myself about your state of mind but I can't speak to that by merely reading your posts.I tried to join the thread, got called a misogynist, got shamed for being disabled by multiple people. Got told I was having a mental breakdown. Did you report any of them? I assume not as you would have told them.
You make a post explicitly saying that you are sympathetic to certain well documented transphobic arguments about bathrooms so I feel fair in pointing it out.
Sure it did.
Personally I didn't disagree with anything said regarding your 'context'. I'm afraid I have to wonder myself about your state of mind but I can't speak to that by merely reading your posts.
What?Sorry what?
What did you mean by that paragraph?What?
You'll be pleased to note that I have not reported this post. Congrats!
What, with all the accusations you’re throwing out tonight? Sure it wouldn’t.I've changed it now. What could I have meant anyway, it wouldn't even make sense.
What, with all the accusations you’re throwing out tonight? Sure it wouldn’t.
No. Nor am I dealing the the reports about you. I’m an active participant in this thread with responses back and forth with you, therefore I have to recuse myself.Are you dealing with the personal attacks aimed at me?
I don't feel the need to clarify my post.What did you mean by that paragraph?
That you agree that I've been personally attacked multiple times about my physical and mental health as well as being called a misogynist which as it is a form of bigot I should be really upset about and reporting?
Or that you are sympathetic to those posts?
I don't feel the need to clarify my post.
I do wish you'd stop spoiling this thread.
No. Nor am I dealing the the reports about you. I’m an active participant in this thread with responses back and forth with you, therefore I have to recuse myself.
Big wipe of the brow after that “mixed race” post, eh?Thank feck.