To which I agree. I've never been a big fan of spending myself but this is a necessity before we fall into obscurity. I think the owners are in a shock on how much we need to spend after relative success without much spending.I think I appreciated what your reply was meant to be quite well. If i were in the room with the Glazers and one of them raised the same doubts you had, then this would be my reply. If it's a harsh tone that's because this truth should sting the owners. They miscalculated how quickly the money would flow into the sport w other teams in under investing before SAF retired. They screwed up monumentally hiring DM. Now They are on the cusp of making or breaking this business in the short term and need a shake up.
I say short term because we are fortunate to have become the most successful club in England during a golden period of globalization. It's allowed us to build a worldwide fanbase larger than the clubs I mentioned as warning. This will extend our period of grace but shouldn't be seen as an excuse to cut corners.
I heard the same thing last year.They'll move 10 points clear at the top of that list by time the window closes.
Did Mourinho sleep with your ex or something?
Number 9 doesn't belong to Martial or anyone...With all things in life, you don't take something that belongs to someone else and pass it on. Even though I can see the reasoning behind it, as Zlatan is an established senior player and a star at that, I expect a more reasonable decision from a 50+ year old adult.
Unprofessional and disrespectful towards Martial. At the time when Mourinho arrived, Martial was basically our go-to-guy. So, as #9 was occupied, I just don't understand why he didn't give, say, the vacant #11 to Zlatan instead of complicating this.
I am a big martial fan but if he decided to let his confidence go down because he lost his number 9 then I really doubt lad's mental strength.
Number 9 doesn't belong to Martial or anyone...
Hope this youngster is more motivated than his uncle.Manchester United, Manchester City, Chelsea and Liverpool have a strong interest in signing 15-year-old Dutch youth defender MelayroBogarde, nephew of former Chelsea defender Winston Bogarde, say the Observer.
Bogarde plays for Feyenoord, and will be a free agent on May 28 next year when he turns 16.
Yeah, media makes things up and then connect 2 and 2 and end up with 5. I dont believe one second it is related, Woody acting the minute news about Jose not being happy emerged.
FFP is stupid anyway.
No club should be told how much they can and can't spend.
Really think Jose is open to trying Pereira and McTominay instead. He might see the latter's height and try to make a Fellaini out of him.Well Matic is a good signing. Definitely opens up Herrera and Pogba to have a little more freedom.
Selling Fellaini no matter how bad people want him to leave, still leaves us with a gap in midfield unless he decides to play 4231 more than a 433
Hope this youngster is more motivated than his uncle.
I was worried I had got the wrong bloke, but I haven't it seems.Damnit. I was trying to the think of a good cheap jibe on that subject but you beat me to it!
Maybe that will allow Perreira to cement his place in the team besides I think we will sign a DM.Well Matic is a good signing. Definitely opens up Herrera and Pogba to have a little more freedom.
Selling Fellaini no matter how bad people want him to leave, still leaves us with a gap in midfield unless he decides to play 4231 more than a 433
I've not seen a Daily Star in about eight years. Guessing their main revenue is online.How does the Daily Star still exist? Like, who actually buys it?!
I was worried I had got the wrong bloke, but I haven't it seems.
That implication does not follow at all, although we kind of are already with the UK TV deal. We have states backing football teams and playing a game of international keeping up with the Jonses. This is way beyond some teams having a bit more cash than others.
Also, we really couldn't buy the whole West Ham team for a whole host of reasons.
A source close to Galatasaray has revealed to Turkish-Football that Fellaini has reached an agreement-in-principle.
To which I agree. I've never been a big fan of spending myself but this is a necessity before we fall into obscurity. I think the owners are in a shock on how much we need to spend after relative success without much spending.
I don't know what was required of José to achieve last season but I'm guessing the CL was an objective but it's hard for them to overlook the poor league campaign after a heavy investment last summer. I'm more inclined that more money will be released of our targets this summer had a longer life span i.e younger player's. I vividly remember Woodward stating that the club were majorly interested in backing bids for 25 year olds and below in the transfer windows. The
Could this be a reason for an assumed hesitation? If it's true and José knows this, why doesn't he have other viable option given how much work we have put in our scouting development lately. If rumours are true, only 4 of 8 of his signings would have been under 25, the rest nearing 30 compared to City whose investments mainly fall on the younger side.
Moyes happened!This is where I find one of the most detrimental decisions this club has made to be letting Evra, Rio, Vidic, RVP all go in quick succession. Even in their waning days their influence would have been great. Imagine Uncle Pat in Martials ear!
SO this is not happening?I want to see him leave, but this is laughable. These accounts are garbage and shouldn't be posted here.
SO this is not happening?
Seems an awful lost of smoke for to be no fire but are you saying they are all quoting each other or the one weak source?
Other than rvp, they weren't in their waning days, evra and rio had gone full on rooney for us when they were let go and vidic wasn't that far behind. Am i the only one who remembers how poor evra was defensively in his last 1-2 years here even under fergie, rio had lost his pace and was a big liability at back, vidic was going downhill fast, there is a reason why only evra of those 3 actually managed to play at a decent level and perform well and that too was helped by being in a slower league with a worldclass back 3 protecting and masking his mistakes.This is where I find one of the most detrimental decisions this club has made to be letting Evra, Rio, Vidic, RVP all go in quick succession. Even in their waning days their influence would have been great. Imagine Uncle Pat in Martials ear!
I get ya, cheers. I actually forgot the club confirmed it.Galatasaray's president confirmed the talks for Fellaini, so there's every reason to believe something's happening.
I'm just saying that it's hard to believe this shite aggregator account has connections at any club, let alone one of the biggest ones in Turkey.
Probably just seems that way to you.How come it seems like a club of our size can only work on one deal at a time?
Lindelof - time passes - Lukaku - time passes - Matic (?) - time passes?
Can't we multi task??
Moyes happened!
Other than rvp, they weren't in their waning days, evra and rio had gone full on rooney for us when they were let go and vidic wasn't that far behind. Am i the only one who remembers how poor evra was defensively in his last 1-2 years here even under fergie, rio had lost his pace and was a big liability at back, vidic was going downhill fast, there is a reason why only evra of those 3 actually managed to play at a decent level and perform well and that too was helped by being in a slower league with a worldclass back 3 protecting and masking his mistakes.