Transfer Tweets - Summer 2015 | Stop Spamming - Discussion Should Relate to Tweets

Status
Not open for further replies.
izec said:
He is neither, at least from the position he plays in. You just cant replace Vidal or Pirlo with Eriksen. They wanted Draxler, now Eriksen palys the same role, behind the striker or on the left. It is bullshit obviously, would be far too expensive.
Click to expand...
Not saying he's great. I said he's decent, which he is. He has some good footballing qualities. Of course, you can't replace Pirlo and Vidal easily but they have to move on and probably change the formation because unless they get Veratti there is hardly anyone who can play in Pirlo role. Eriksen is probably not a bad option, considering Serie A is slower in tempo and suits him more probably. WIth so many super-clubs around, it is very difficult to get even decent player for decent price.

zlatan_ish said:
He is not deep-lying playmaker though. Marchisio is Pirlo's replacement. We're in the market for a attacking midfielder and we also need a set-piece specialist after Pirlo left.

Yeah, I think Spurs won't let him go either, will ask for high amount anyway.
Click to expand...
Agreed. I meant he is not very strong defensively like Vidal and more like Pirlo. Interestingly, Pirlo and Eriksen, despite looking not contributing much defensively, cover a lot more ground than expected.
 
We have Khedira, Ma
dustfingers said:
Not saying he's great. I said he's decent, which he is. He has some good footballing qualities. Of course, you can't replace Pirlo and Vidal easily but they have to move on and probably change the formation because unless they get Veratti there is hardly anyone who can play in Pirlo role. Eriksen is probably not a bad option, considering Serie A is slower in tempo and suits him more probably. WIth so many super-clubs around, it is very difficult to get even decent player for decent price.


Agreed. I meant he is not very strong defensively like Vidal and more like Pirlo. Interestingly, Pirlo and Eriksen, despite looking not contributing much defensively, cover a lot more ground than expected.
Click to expand...

Oh, I didn't know about his defensive work rate. Good to know.
 
Jamie Jackson in writing bitter article plucked from thin air shocker.
 
Marukomu has second thoughts about installing Twitter due to knobsocks like Jamie jackson
 


When asked about the alleged interest, Muller replied, according toGoal.com: "I don't know, you have to ask him (Van Gaal). I am the wrong man for this question."
 
Raoul said:
The usual steaming hot mess from Jackson. He should be banned from pressers for his unsourced clickbait shit stirring.
Click to expand...
I said some time ago that he should e banned from here considering that he only makes clickbait articles, which always have United in some negative light, and he clearly has no real information at all (like Di Maria's case last season). Same goes for Castles who is an even bigger cnut.

You laughed at my suggestion. :)
 
Revan said:
I said some time ago that he should e banned from here considering that he only makes clickbait articles, which always have United in some negative light, and he clearly has no real information at all (like Di Maria's case last season). Same goes for Castles who is an even bigger cnut.

You laughed at my suggestion. :)
Click to expand...

Big difference between banning a journo here and at United pressers. The Twitter thread is 90% BS for the easily led, whereas United shouldn't be tolerating a journo who puts out bad, unsourced information.
 
Full Member said:
I bet he looked ever more terrified after seeing his side capitulate at the hands of Bilbao.
Click to expand...
I was following the game on Sky Match live or whatever it's called. They said he led with his elbow on somebody and could have been sent off. Obviously wants to catch an early flight to Manchester.:D
 
Raoul said:
Big difference between banning a journo here and at United pressers. The Twitter thread is 90% BS for the easily led, whereas United shouldn't be tolerating a journo who puts out bad, unsourced information.
Click to expand...
I agree. Although, I don't get the point why he is still allowed here. His only contributions has been portraying United in some negative way, and he has been proven clueless every time we signed a transfer. Same like Castles.

Seriously, bar their official jobs, is there any difference between him and the ITK like indykalia? Both have no real information, at least indykalia is unbiased :)
 
Judas said:
If you come in this thread for factual information you're in the wrong place.
Click to expand...
Not neccesarily. The likes of di marzio or some of the Spanish radios (Cadena Cope for example) have some good information. Then we have some other journos like Ballague who have some information, etc etc.

The likes of Castles/Jackson just make negative headlines in order to get more clicks for their articles. They know as much as Jon Snow.
 
Revan said:
I agree. Although, I don't get the point why he is still allowed here. His only contributions has been portraying United in some negative way, and he has been proven clueless every time we signed a transfer. Same like Castles.

Seriously, bar their official jobs, is there any difference between him and the ITK like indykalia? Both have no real information, at least indykalia is unbiased :)
Click to expand...

He's allowed here because he works for a major newspaper and there's certainly no relation between him and indykaila. We want content from journos, especially those who attend United pressers here. As we saw above, not all their content is legit so maybe those who post tweets should consider whether or not something is worth posting before doing so.
 
What else is he supposed to say ? I want to transfer away from Spurs, who I don't think will ever make the CL, to a proper big club who are already in it ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.