Transfer Tweets - Summer 2015 | Stop Spamming - Discussion Should Relate to Tweets

Status
Not open for further replies.
So what is it that you want to do in that case and to act like a big club? Force him to sign a contract? Keep him another year unhappy and then let him walk free? We have to accept that there are bigger and stronger clubs than United in this world, and Madrid is one of them

No, maybe we can focus on signing players who are nearer to their peak, from other parts of Europe [not Iberia and South America]. Odd as that may sound, Chelsea are using that model, and yeah, we can accept that other clubs are bigger, but what's the point then if you're not going to do anything about it. Do you standstill because other clubs are bigger? No. You do something about it.
 


Pilib de Brun: As everyone knows the De Gea decision has been made, club are fully aware of his intentions & have given up trying to keep him.



Utd knew this was the most likely outcome back in January hence the Valdes signing and identifying replacements.
 
No, maybe we can focus on signing players who are nearer to their peak, from other parts of Europe [not Iberia and South America]. Odd as that may sound, Chelsea are using that model, and yeah, we can accept that other clubs are bigger, but what's the point then if you're not going to do anything about it. Do you standstill because other clubs are bigger? No. You do something about it.
I agree with this 100%. People like to exaggerate this supposed pull of Real Madrid but it only really extends to Iberian and South American players. I am not saying they are not attractive to the rest of the world but it is not as one sided by any stretch. Liverpool never lost Gerrard to them despite them being $hIte, Chelsea did not lose Cole or Lampard and come to think of it, they never lost anyone they did not want to sell. We never lost anybody we wanted to keep to anyone either until Ronaldo and no DDG. Bayern Munich are the same, in the case of Kroos, they obviously did not try hard enough to keep him financially speaking. People were questioning Sir Alex's transfer policy but that might have been one the things he has in mind, he usually refused to buy players who idealised Real and Barcelona because he knew it reflects badly on the club when we lose them and I find this to be not only the right attitude of a big club but also a hugely beneficial one in the sense that it creates the aura and continuity that big clubs absolutely need. I am not advocating boycotting the Iberian or South American market but I think one of the criteria of our transfer targets need to be that they are not obviously using us as a stop gap. This rules out Pogba for example at the moment. As I stated before, this is not to say we should only buy players we can count on to be with us long term but it is more to do with the image of the club when it loses players it wants to keep.
 
No, maybe we can focus on signing players who are nearer to their peak, from other parts of Europe [not Iberia and South America]. Odd as that may sound, Chelsea are using that model, and yeah, we can accept that other clubs are bigger, but what's the point then if you're not going to do anything about it. Do you standstill because other clubs are bigger? No. You do something about it.

Chelsea have signed quite a few Spanish and South American players recently, both young and at peak. The main issue we have with De Gea IMO is that we have finished 7th and 4th in the past 2 years. If we were serioulsy challenging for the UCL I don't think Real would have had it so easy.
 
Chelsea have signed quite a few Spanish and South American players recently, both young and at peak. The main issue we have with De Gea IMO is that we have finished 7th and 4th in the past 2 years. If we were serioulsy challenging for the UCL I don't think Real would have had it so easy.

The ones they sign don't have star quality. I think if De Gea was maybe German, English or French, we would have had more chance of keeping him [i know its odd, but that's my thought hehe]. Ronaldo left after a successful CL campaign, we came second I think, and we were genuinely a force back then. Being competitive helps I know, so does signing players of certain nationality and age. As an example, I feel confident that Chelsea can keep Hazard for very long.
 


Pilib de Brun: As everyone knows the De Gea decision has been made, club are fully aware of his intentions & have given up trying to keep him.



Utd knew this was the most likely outcome back in January hence the Valdes signing and identifying replacements.


some of the posters read the Valdes trasnfer in this way. It seems they were right.
 
Regarding transfers too, we also need to start using the media like a modern club. The way we use the media is so childish and meek, stop being the nice guys ffs! Football is not a popularity contest.
 
The ones they sign don't have star quality. I think if De Gea was maybe German, English or French, we would have had more chance of keeping him [i know its odd, but that's my thought hehe]. Ronaldo left after a successful CL campaign, we came second I think, and we were genuinely a force back then. Being competitive helps I know, so does signing players of certain nationality and age. As an example, I feel confident that Chelsea can keep Hazard for very long.

In a couple of years, if Chelsea don't win the UCL Hazard will be a Real/Barca/Bayern player
You are right about their players star quality though, but if we want to stop our players going to Real or Barca then we have to build a better team (hard to do that though of course)

E.g Henry (is French) and he went to Barcelona.


EDIT: Even if Chelsea do win the UCL, they have to build a team that will truely dominate/compete consistently or Hazard will be taken away
 
In a couple of years, if Chelsea don't win the UCL Hazard will be a Real/Barca/Bayern player
You are right about their players star quality though, but if we want to stop our players going to Real or Barca then we have to build a better team (hard to do that though of course)

E.g Henry (is French) and he went to Barcelona.


EDIT: Even if Chelsea do win the UCL, they have to build a team that will truely dominate/compete consistently or Hazard will be taken away

Henry was already past his best when he went to Barca. I'm not saying they will never move to Spain, am saying they'll spend their peak years here, Hazard is 24, I see him at Chelsea for the next 4 or 5 years at the very least, meaning he'll spend his peak years in England.
 
I like the idea of forcing a swap deal with someone they don't want to lose. They're getting too used to getting it all their own way.
 


Last I heard he was being linked with Spurs.
 
Henry was already past his best when he went to Barca. I'm not saying they will never move to Spain, am saying they'll spend their peak years here, Hazard is 24, I see him at Chelsea for the next 4 or 5 years at the very least, meaning he'll spend his peak years in England.

We'll see on that one, I can see him moving if Real/Barca start flirting with him in the next 2/3 seasons

EDIT: I do agree that nationality etc of latin/iberian players mean they will prefer those teams. However the fact they are also teams who dominate and are expected to win the UCL is the biggest factor. They are know to be in the top3 teams on the planet with Bayern.

If we want to keep our best players Iberian or not, we need to improve and sharpish.
I seriously believe De Gea would have signed a new contract had we been competitive in the league and UCL
 



That would be the best most luxurious cushion in the world, swapping a key player yes, but gaining a top player for a position we are in desperate need of filling with no standout targets out there to fill it.

Shame it's a load of rubbish, RM need him too who would they replace him with and for what cost?

Best we can hope for is Carvajal, or Navas realistically .
 
In a couple of years, if Chelsea don't win the UCL Hazard will be a Real/Barca/Bayern player
You are right about their players star quality though, but if we want to stop our players going to Real or Barca then we have to build a better team (hard to do that though of course)

E.g Henry (is French) and he went to Barcelona.


EDIT: Even if Chelsea do win the UCL, they have to build a team that will truely dominate/compete consistently or Hazard will be taken away
Real Madrid doesnt dominate tho, and their recent record of CL wins is average compared to the rest of us
 
That would be the best most luxurious cushion in the world, swapping a key player yes, but gaining a top player for a position we are in desperate need of filling with no standout targets out there to fill it.

Shame it's a load of rubbish, RM need him too who would they replace him with and for what cost?

Best we can hope for is Carvajal, or Navas realistically .
Isn't it being muted that Bale will get a more central role? Would be a bit of a coup to get Benzema & do us no harm in being taken seriously in the minds of other top targets.
 
Real Madrid doesnt dominate tho, and their recent record of CL wins is average compared to the rest of us

Compare wins to at least semi final appearances... They are always one of the favourties to win.
 
Real Madrid doesnt dominate tho, and their recent record of CL wins is average compared to the rest of us

I was going to say this. Real Madrid do NOT dominate at al, it's a myth. How many CL for the past 15 yrs, how many league titles? CR7 won more with us than he has done there.
 
Compare wins to at least semi final appearances... They are always one of the favourties to win.

We, Chelsea, Barca & Bayern all have more semi and final appearances than them in the past 10 yrs.
 
We, Chelsea, Barca & Bayern all have more semi and final appearances than them in the past 10 yrs.

Yes ok, but these things are relative, compared to our current situation how do you sell that to a player who is being courted by them.
When in the last 5 years they have either won it or got to at least the semi final? Compared to us not even playing in it this season? Also I imagine their superstar signings also have great pull.

When you become one of the best in the world in your position (as De Gea has now) you want to play with the best players.
 
Yes ok, but these things are relative, compared to our current situation how do you sell that to a player who is being courted by them.
When in the last 5 years they have either won it or got to at least the semi final? Compared to us not even playing in it this season? Also I imagine their superstar signings also have great pull.

When you become one of the best in the world in your position (as De Gea has now) you want to play with the best players.

He's a GK, and is 24 and has like 10 yrs more, we finished 7th, promised to come back to CL places and we did it, he knows we have money, knows we'll be active again this summer, knows we have a world class manager now, I think that's how we sell it to him. Anyway, hope we're not derailing the thread :lol:
 
some of the posters read the Valdes trasnfer in this way. It seems they were right.

De Brun is clearly just using that logic to imply he has inside knowledge.
 


Morrison was always the flashier, but not sure about the star part. I remember watching Pogba play and feeling that he wouldn't have been out of place in the first team -- can't recall ever feeling that about Morrison, despite his obvious talent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.