Bubz27
No I won’t change your tag line
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2009
- Messages
- 21,938
Miranda and Vidic at the back for Inter?
Rumors picking up on Twitter that we're in for Witsel. Having the option of playing Matic & Witsel as a partnership actually sounds pretty nice.
Replacing Mikel's place in the team with Witsel is a definite upgrade. Having Matic, Fabregas, Witsel, Ramires, and RLC to choose from is a great set of options.
Rumors picking up on Twitter that we're in for Witsel. Having the option of playing Matic & Witsel as a partnership actually sounds pretty nice.
Replacing Mikel's place in the team with Witsel is a definite upgrade. Having Matic, Fabregas, Witsel, Ramires, and RLC to choose from is a great set of options.
Great signing for them. United should have been involved at that price if the De Gea thing isn't going away.
Would you still consider him a Chelsea legend?Absolutely disgusting to see him in that shirt.
Absolutely disgusting to see him in that shirt.
Chelsea do have an aesthetically pleasing shirt. One of the few nice things that can be said about Chelsea.
Arsenal aren't that badSurely Cech can do better
Obvioulsy, yes.Would you still consider him a Chelsea legend?
Feck off, Eboue. Just feck off.Chelsea do have an aesthetically pleasing shirt. One of the few nice things that can be said about Chelsea.
We should offer Cech £200k/ week. An offer her can't refuse.
Arsenal aren't that bad
Cech would never have fitted into LVG's passing style. I don't get what's so hard about that to understand.
LVG likes keepers to be very good with the ball at their feet. See Valdes/VDS/De Gea/Cillesson. Cech is very very average in that department.
Tancredi returns
Cech would never have fitted into LVG's passing style. I don't get what's so hard about that to understand.
LVG likes keepers to be very good with the ball at their feet. See Valdes/VDS/De Gea/Cillesson. Cech is very very average in that department.
But very very good in the other department, you know the one where he keeps the ball out of the back of the net.
I had a rather long, drawn out discussion about this the other night so won't go in to all that again but I get what you mean, LGV wants to be able to play out from the back which is fair enough but getting someone like Cillesson in because he can pass better than Cech would be damn right foolish because the latter is a much, much better goalkeeper.
I get that, and not saying he will but especially a position like GK, I think it makes little sense to choose a comfortably weaker GK simply because this guy is good on the ball.
But very very good in the other department, you know the one where he keeps the ball out of the back of the net.
I had a rather long, drawn out discussion about this the other night so won't go in to all that again but I get what you mean, LGV wants to be able to play out from the back which is fair enough but getting someone like Cillesson in because he can pass better than Cech would be damn right foolish because the latter is a much, much better goalkeeper.
Exactly, LvG told me everything I need to know about Cillesson, and he showed everyone what he thinks of Cillesson when he subbed him for Krul before the penalty shootout in the World Cup.
He only told you, that he cared about stats and mental games. At no point LVG told anyone that Cillessen wasn't good.
That orange is just ghastly isn't it?Absolutely disgusting to see him in that shirt.
Exactly, LvG told me everything I need to know about Cillesson, and he showed everyone what he thinks of Cillesson when he subbed him for Krul before the penalty shootout in the World Cup.
My surname is Lennon and my first name is Niall, hence LennonNL (my initials at the end). Devastated though because it definitely looks like a Spurs kind of username nowEvery time I see your username, I keep thinking you're a Spurs fan. 'Lennon' for Aaron Lennon and 'NL' for North London.
That orange is just ghastly isn't it?
I loved it for the tactical reasons, a great move, but are you telling me he would have done it if Van Der Sar was in goal? Or he would swap De Gea in a CL final? I'm not saying Cillesson is not any good, but that move doesn't fill me with confidence about him. I'd happily put Valdes in and give him a chance and wait for someone better to come along.
The facts are very simple Cillessen never stopped a penalty shot during his short career (I don't know how many he faced), on the other end Krul had stopped penalties regularly. So LVG thought that it was a good idea to use Krul because his stats were better and it would make the Costa Rican think a little bit too much.
And to be fair just use your logic if LVG thought that Cillessen wasn't better than Krul it would have been him on the bench not Krul.
I loved it for the tactical reasons, a great move, but are you telling me he would have done it if Van Der Sar was in goal? Or he would swap De Gea in a CL final? I'm not saying Cillesson is not any good, but that move doesn't fill me with confidence about him. I'd happily put Valdes in and give him a chance and wait for someone better to come along.
I dont get this 'I'd rather have a great shot stopper then great passer' kind of attitude that keeps being mentioned. Why not have both? And we do. We have Valdes. He's a great shot stopper and great with his feet.