Rake
Full Member
I had a dream we signed Onana.
Does that mean we wont?
I had a dream we signed Onana.
I’m not sure - but here’s what happened in the dream.Does that mean we wont?
I’m not sure - but here’s what happened in the dream.
- we were playing Brighton
- we took a 1-0 lead through Bruno
- Brighton equalised
- we subbed DdG off for Onana
- Brighton took the lead with a shot Onana could have done better for
- Bruno got injured
- we lost the game 4-2
2 days to go, I think it’s fair to say that they’ve made their decisionOf course they haven't. It is par for the course.
You are likely right. You would have thought if DDG was staying they would have announced it by now.2 days to go, I think it’s fair to say that they’ve made their decision
2 days to go, I think it’s fair to say that they’ve made their decision
Pretty sure he’s walking away at this stage.You are likely right. You would have thought if DDG was staying they would have announced it by now.
Might go back to Spain if someone will pay him a reasonable amount.Pretty sure he’s walking away at this stage.
So many jokes 'come to mind', but I must resist.I had a dream we signed Onana.
Bingo.Think it’s incredible the club have not decided on Dave at this stage. Unless the press knows feck all.
Whilst a agree in principle, think Garnacho is fantastic and Sancho meh at best, have to remember that Garnacho was injured for a long period, before that was getting good game time, he is also only 19 (?) so even without Sancho doubt he would be playing 90 minutes each weekOne of the main decisions to be made is to actually play the most exciting prospect we have by far instead of bloody Sancho. The lad has been cruelly underused whilst Sancho f**** up every run and pass he makes for 80 minutes - Garnacho is then given ten minutes to come on to perform miracles.
Yes, I am angry about this.
One of the main decisions to be made is to actually play the most exciting prospect we have by far instead of bloody Sancho. The lad has been cruelly underused whilst Sancho f**** up every run and pass he makes for 80 minutes - Garnacho is then given ten minutes to come on to perform miracles.
Yes, I am angry about this.
Whilst a agree in principle, think Garnacho is fantastic and Sancho meh at best, have to remember that Garnacho was injured for a long period, before that was getting good game time, he is also only 19 (?) so even without Sancho doubt he would be playing 90 minutes each week
Dithered and got left behind, what a surprise.
Beckham - 19Garnacho has not been underused - he has gotten plenty of game time - and has justified why with his performances, but he’s still a kid growing into his body playing in arguably the hardest/most physical league
He’s been managed very well
Beckham - 19
G. Neville - 19
P. Neville - 18
N. Butt - 19
R Giggs - 18
P. Scholes - 20
L. Sharpe - 17
W Rooney - 18
Those are not first appearances, those are the ages at which they became regulars in the first team squad, so don't give me the 'well managed' spiel.
Beckham - 19
G. Neville - 19
P. Neville - 18
N. Butt - 19
R Giggs - 18
P. Scholes - 20
L. Sharpe - 17
W Rooney - 18
Those are not first appearances, those are the ages at which they became regulars in the first team squad, so don't give me the 'well managed' spiel.
Agreed. I think they've made their decision a long time ago.Making no decision is their decision. His contract will run out on Friday and he’ll no longer be a Utd player. Decision made.
18 year old defensive midfielder who is press resistant.Just buy him, reminds me of Xavi
Agree with this, don't think hes really impacted a game when starting. Coming off the bench against tired legs he's looked great though. The next step for him has got to be having the same impact when starting, hopefully he can do that next season. I think Rashford may play more through the middle so he should get his chance.Not to cause an argument but he has looked much better coming off the bench so far. He will improve and he will become a star. In my opinion he was managed well.