This guy's pretty good when it comes to reporting news about Barcelona (despite working for Gol from time to time). Thanks to @Rolaholic from the Frenkie de Jong thread:
Translated summary:
Translated summary:
Discredits speculative statement by providing another speculative statement it can only be the transfer thread!He'll improve our team but he won't transform it. Tchouameni would have been more of a transformative signing but I concede that we never had a shot at getting him.
Hmm the entire forum thinks any keeper would have a good chance displacing DDG yet none of the managers seem to think so. Makes you wonder….Weird move for Strakosha if true unless Raya is suddenly off somewhere.
Going to PL relegation fodder (I like Brentford but they'll be in a battle this season for sure) to be a backup again in the prime of his career? Odd choice.
He would genuinely have a better chance at displacing De Gea at United I think as well. Then again maybe that was all paper talk and United were never interested in the first place.
A reminder of the Andreas Pereira fee:
A reminder of the Andreas Pereira fee:
Just out of curiosity.. is it 8m + 2m add on taking the total to 10m or does the 8m include the potential add on?
Its £10m in total
£8m plus £2m add ons
Goodluck to him.
Hope he does well
Liverpool for £17m for Neco Williams with what 20 championship matches? Compared to Pereira's experience? Lord know how Liverpool do it tbh.
It’s usually profit on future sale. So 20% of anything above what they paid for him.Anyone know if it is 20% of a future sale, or 20% profit on a future sale?
Anyone know if it is 20% of a future sale, or 20% profit on a future sale?
On the contrary, the sell-on clause typically applies on the gross earnings of a sale, not the net earnings, unless there's a special clause that's inserted into the deal. In this case, such a clause hasn't been reported, so we'll be getting 20% of the total transfer fee instead of 20% of the profits. Of course, this does mean that certain clubs only sell if they themselves can get a profit after giving up 20% of the total proceeds.It’s usually profit on future sale. So 20% of anything above what they paid for him.
Link to this please? When they leaked the agreement between United and Monaco for Martial, it stipulates that if Martial is sold, then Monaco get a portion of the amount above how much United had paid for him at that point (inclusive of add ons).On the contrary, the sell-on clause typically applies on the gross earnings of a sale, not the net earnings, unless there's a special clause that's inserted into the deal. In this case, such a clause hasn't been reported, so we'll be getting 20% of the total transfer fee instead of 20% of the profits. Of course, this does mean that certain clubs only sell if they themselves can get a profit after giving up 20% of the total proceeds.
Martial's deal was a special case. Another example of that is Sterling's sale from Liverpool to City, which bagged QPR a minimum of £7.8m based on the profits. However, here's how two researchers have defined the sell-on clause in their paper:Link to this please? When they leaked the agreement between United and Monaco for Martial, it stipulates that if Martial is sold, then Monaco get a portion of the amount above how much United had paid for him at that point (inclusive of add ons).
Which makes more sense too than 20% gross.
In its most common use, the sell-on clause is inserted in transfer contracts between two clubs, whereby the selling club, against a lower immediate transfer fee, retains the right to a certain percentage of a potential future transfer fee of the player to a third club.
I simply want somebody to buy him so that I do not have to fear that he pops up at my club.
Honestly, given our situation, I wouldn't mind him. I've always liked watching him play, and I'm hoping that he can develop and refine his game further at a better club.I simply want somebody to buy him so that I do not have to fear that he pops up at my club.
Hmm the entire forum thinks any keeper would have a good chance displacing DDG yet none of the managers seem to think so. Makes you wonder….
Like I’m sorry but if you think whoever the hell this guy is, is better than DDG, then I don’t know how to help you.
More info from the same source (and further corroboration):
That's right...£17 million in add ons? The amount of outstanding wages owed to de Jong?
Thanks to @unplayable, @Berbaclass, and @Rolaholic in the Frenkie de Jong thread:
Source:
Ignore the headline and Tweet; Hirst updated the headline soon afterwards with the Frenkie de Jong info.
Yeah, would agree with that. Besides, don't sign VfB players ffs.would love an Austrian player at United. But as somebody who follows Stuttgart closely, I feel clubs like United are too big for Kalajdzic. His plateau is probably a club like West Ham.
Yeah, would agree with that. Besides, don't sign VfB players ffs.
Rather him than Brobbey, I suppose
Me too, but deary me, what an underwhelming set of (reported) options for a club of our calibre.
That said, if it happens I'm sure Ten Hag would know how to get the best out of him. After all, it seems like this type of striker is important for his style of play (eg Haller).
So after Barcelona for Arnold and Murtough, next stop Amsterdam.That's something, honestly. It's all about the baby steps.
If they come to Stuttgart for Kalajdzic afterwards, I'll provide minute by minute coverage of their trip. Or join in.So after Barcelona for Arnold and Murtough, next stop Amsterdam.
If they come to Stuttgart for Kalajdzic afterwards, I'll provide minute by minute coverage of their trip. Or join in.