Transfer Tweets - 2021/22 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nori- said:
Every now and again I remember we could have bought Haaland for £17m but didn't as we were "drawing a line" with Raiola.

Fast forward, he is now the most wanted player in the world, rumours of £150m to Chelsea and.......We will more than likely still have to deal with Raiola with other players.

Sigh.
Click to expand...

No, Raiola wanted a release clause which we don't do. You can stop lamenting over things that never happened.
 
Scorpy said:
How would playing for Inter Miami complete Messi's legacy exactly?
Click to expand...
Mas is probably trying to compare it to Beckham's legacy and how Beckham was able to massively promote the sport in the U.S., though I don't know if Messi's the sort of player seek out that much publicity. Cristiano Ronaldo would be a better fit in that sense.
 
Dwazza Gunnar Solskjær said:
No, Raiola wanted a release clause which we don't do. You can stop lamenting over things that never happened.
Click to expand...

Whichever way you look at it, we messed up.....badly.

Say he did want a release clause (£60m?), 1. That's £43m profit or 2. He could have been the missing piece for us winning things and maybe would have signed a new contract without a clause? We even have his old manager and mentor Ole in charge.

We've been absolutely horrible in the transfer market in recent years apart from the odd player.
 
Nori- said:
Whichever way you look at it, we messed up.....badly.

Say he did want a release clause (£60m?), 1. That's £43m profit or 2. He could have been the missing piece for us winning things and maybe would have signed a new contract without a clause? We even have his old manager and mentor Ole in charge.

We've been absolutely horrible in the transfer market in recent years apart from the odd player.
Click to expand...

Sometimes there are bigger things than just the financials.

What precedent does it set if a club of our stature starts accepting release clauses like that for these players? Especially with Raiola as his agent. If we got ourselves into Dortmunds situation the same posters lamenting us not buying him would be making thread after thread about how "embarrasing" it is.

Can't please some people.
 
Nori- said:
Whichever way you look at it, we messed up.....badly.

Say he did want a release clause (£60m?), 1. That's £43m profit or 2. He could have been the missing piece for us winning things and maybe would have signed a new contract without a clause? We even have his old manager and mentor Ole in charge.

We've been absolutely horrible in the transfer market in recent years apart from the odd player.
Click to expand...
Get over it. He chose Dortmund because he was guaranteed playing time and they would accept the clause. We're not signing players to try to make a profit on them. Move on.
 
Nori- said:
Whichever way you look at it, we messed up.....badly.

Say he did want a release clause (£60m?), 1. That's £43m profit or 2. He could have been the missing piece for us winning things and maybe would have signed a new contract without a clause? We even have his old manager and mentor Ole in charge.

We've been absolutely horrible in the transfer market in recent years apart from the odd player.
Click to expand...

United don't actually care about selling players for profit. The club cares about acquiring the best players and retaining them for as long as possible.

Haaland arriving and leaving two years later for a pittance of his actual worth thanks to us agreeing to Raiola's demand for a release clause would result in more and worse moaning about our prowess in the transfer market and damage our reputation as a big club.
 
Last edited:
Nori- said:
Whichever way you look at it, we messed up.....badly.

Say he did want a release clause (£60m?), 1. That's £43m profit or 2. He could have been the missing piece for us winning things and maybe would have signed a new contract without a clause? We even have his old manager and mentor Ole in charge.

We've been absolutely horrible in the transfer market in recent years apart from the odd player.
Click to expand...
Whichever way you look at it, Haaland was always going to Dortmund, especially with a buyout clause and even without one. The same applies to Jude Bellingham who was always going to Dortmund as reported by both the German and Birmingham based media.
 
roseguy64 said:
Get over it. He chose Dortmund because he was guaranteed playing time and they would accept the clause. We're not signing players to try to make a profit on them. Move on.
Click to expand...

It's a hard pill to swallow, I understand but telling anyone who mentions it to "move on" 1. Stops any discussion on a relevant issue 2. Gives the club the green light to continue to do horrible business like this and continue many more years of under achieving.
 
Mark Pawelek said:
The reason not to buy Sancho is the money must be spent on a top class central defender and defensive midfield both of who should start when fit. After emergency holes have been fixed in the roof you can have the luxuries you want.
Click to expand...
Yet you want to ignore the massive hole at RW, which has been there for, what, 10 years? Sancho would be the first step in fixing those holes.
 
Well, I guess he'll smoothen the transition from Mourinho, but he's an underwhelming appointment for me.
 
do.ob said:
The weird thing about a possible Thuram move is that he supposedly had a €30m release clause in his contract, but that options seems to have passed for this window, as Eberl himself said that none of their players do have a release clause anymore, as of now.
Click to expand...
Perhaps, Spurs is short on cash? Instead of paying the release clause up front, Spurs wants to pay in instalment even at a higher fee, so they can allocate the remaining cash for other potential signings.
 
Last edited:
I know there hasn't been any 'real' action, but Ben White for me is an animal. I know he's a centre back by trade, but he'd be awesome in front of the back four. Every time I see him, he's awesome!
 
I was gonna say, why the heck are Spurs trying to sign players when they haven't even got a new manager yet & now the ex-Roma manager's name has suddenly popped up.
 
Solius said:
Genuinely who the hell is this. I swear every other club is money laundering with their deadwood.
Click to expand...

Yeah I was thinking that too.. let's see how the Dalot, Lingard negotiations go. If Porto can pay 15m, Milan, WHU should be able to pay more than that for starting XI players.
 
More info on the new appointment:


Ah, so Paratici played a part in this. I find it weird that they'd go for someone with such a similar profile to Mourinho. Surely, the players were ready for someone with fresh ideas or, at the very least, a more proactive style.
 
UTD_Since_1978 said:
I was gonna say, why the heck are Spurs trying to sign players when they haven't even got a new manager yet & now the ex-Roma manager's name has suddenly popped up.
Click to expand...
Haven't they brought a DOF in though, he might have been working on stuff already even though it hadn't been officially announced.
 
Messi will probably play for Inter Miami but imagine them thinking it completes his legacy :lol:
 
Solius said:
Genuinely who the hell is this. I swear every other club is money laundering with their deadwood.
Click to expand...
Late answer, but he was a fairly well-rated Serbian midfielder back when Liverpool bought him. Even though he didn't impress at Liverpool, he had very good loan spells at Hertha Berlin and a decent loan spell at Porto, which has gotten other teams interested. The fact that he's looked decent at other clubs can potentially raise his value, so he'd be a somewhat different case to both Solanke and Brewster.
 
DomesticTadpole said:
Haven't they brought a DOF in though, he might have been working on stuff already even though it hadn't been officially announced.
Click to expand...

Ok, but call me "old school" if you like but I think it should be the manager's job to choose the players he wants to sign & pick to play in his team not a DOF.

Of course, UTD's transfer negotiators are so inept we probably do need a DOF to bring in new players for our manager.
 
mazhar13 said:
More info on the new appointment:


Ah, so Paratici played a part in this. I find it weird that they'd go for someone with such a similar profile to Mourinho. Surely, the players were ready for someone with fresh ideas or, at the very least, a more proactive style.
Click to expand...

It was reported (not sure where) that Paratici would be given the task of finding the next head coach. So it makes sense that Paratici would approach someone he knows, but I'm not sure I'd be too thrilled as a Spurs fan.
 
Adnan said:
It was reported (not sure where) that Paratici would be given the task of finding the next head coach. So it makes sense that Paratici would approach someone he knows, but I'm not sure I'd be too thrilled as a Spurs fan.
Click to expand...
Yeah, you're right. I'm just surprised that Paratici would approach him of all people. Sure the familiarity is there (via his Roma stint), but with that familiarity, he should have known about his profile and how that differs to what the players would necessarily feel good about. Oh well, what's done is done.
 
mazhar13 said:
Yeah, you're right. I'm just surprised that Paratici would approach him of all people. Sure the familiarity is there (via his Roma stint), but with that familiarity, he should have known about his profile and how that differs to what the players would necessarily feel good about. Oh well, what's done is done.
Click to expand...
This is one of the reasons I didn't want United to go for a external appointment if I'm honest. Paratici is a experienced DoF aswell.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.