In those several years there has been multiple managers and lots of upheaval, no real period of progress for one reason of another.
We’ve essentially been restarting the rebuild process every other year and obviously it’s done is no favours. I don’t think you can just say it’s the Glazers or Woodward.
Sure Woodward has been in charge of overseeing it all and has appointed the managers but no one could have known that all of them would be a disaster.
the club is a mess and it is absolutely in their interest to see that it gets cleared up, this is something I think people are missing. These guys are businessmen, you don’t think they understand the financial potential that we have if we start performing on the field?
I've spent 6 years thinking that but have seen little to no inclination from any of them to put the measures in place to build a better structure to the footballing side of the club.
We literally had Woodward come out last year and say the financial success of the club was not reliant on what happened on the pitch. I have come around to the conclusion that they genuinely believe the club is too big to fall - it wouldn't be the first time that supposedly competent businessmen allowed complacency and arrogance to be their downfall.
As for the idea that nobody could have known the managerial appointments would be a disaster - I disagree. Without a clear and cohesive structure and strategy no manager will come in and be successful in modern football.
Our entire club was built around one man. It was always fantasy to think you can build your club on every manager being a Ferguson or a Busby - the type of talent that comes around once every couple of generations and the likes of which may never be seen again in the modern game.
We had examples of well run, 21st century clubs to look to. The Moyes mistake could have been forgiven as sentiment and inexperience on the part of the club, but after that the leaders in our boardroom had to take stock, look outside their own experience and egos and acknowledge what was working elsewhere.
Barcelona, Bayern, City - clubs who are structured in such a way that a change of manager doesn't instantly result in an entire upheaval of every aspect of the club.
Pep Guardiola, seen as the new messiah and competition for Fergie's legacy, didn't come to City until Begiristain had been there to lay the ground work behind the scenes for a few years.
Klopp who has worked miracles at Liverpool, met with Woodward and walked away because he couldn't get on board with Ed's vision (or lack thereof) for the club. He clearly didn't have the same reaction to his meeting with Liverpool's owners and the last two years have shown he made the right decision.
It's not as simple as picking the right manager from a hat and everything will sort itself out. Rather than blaming all the managers who have failed, we should be pointing our fingers at the people setting them up to fail from above.