Because he's had a tiny amount of first team action, and even someone like Rashford hasn't hit 20 a season.
Unless you rate Greenwood way above Rashford?
You said he wouldn't get 20 in total though. Whilst I have hopes of Greenwood being absolutely amazing and having as good a shot as anyone at getting over 20 goals a season, I'll admit there's a small chance he won't do it. But 20 in total? I've got next to no doubt about that.
Who are sports witness? They make me laugh with there deluded tweets
Who are sports witness? They make me laugh with there deluded tweets
Lets fecking do it. Better than signing no one. Overpaying by at least 30m here but thats better than spunking 30-40m quid on a shite CB or worse going into the season with no new CB. Maguire is a class player not worth that much but he's still class.
They are only translating articles from shite papers.Who are sports witness? They make me laugh with there deluded tweets
Who are sports witness? They make me laugh with there deluded tweets
Just pay the fecking money and move on!
This is reason we're in this mess in the first place.
Paying over the odds for unproven players.
If he was unproven, he wouldn't be so expensive.
Ole better check if there is somebody hiding in his wardrobe.So Solskjaer has picked up the phone to some journo and said "I've just told my CEO to get a move on with the Fernandes transfer" OR Woodward has done the same thing but said "I've just had a call from the manager to speed up the Fernandes deal. Better get cracking!"
Or are the phones/emails tapped??
Is that how these stories work?
Maybe I'll be crucified for saying this (and possibly thread banned) but the state of this thread lately. It's incredible. Only a few people are looking objectively at the articles and thinking interesting but is it likely, or a journalist trying to drum up a non-story or just what I want to hear?
Some people in here are taking it for gospel that we're in for x player or y player when in previous years the media had no idea on our actual signings until negotiations were near the end. Sometimes there were protracted sagas (Pogba) and maybe I'm being forgetful but how many others dragged on? I'm also pretty confident that we haven't gone anywhere near the likes of Fernandes all summer (remind anyone of Gaitan?) or even Maguire. There's a big chance journalists are making lazy links or foreign media/clubs are trying to push transfers and supporters in here is using it as an excuse to attack the club.
Even looking at the De Ligt story - what solid link have we actually had that relates us to De Ligt? Personally I'd rather not sign a 19 year old defender for the ridiculous fee and wages being mentioned, and I imagine some on here who would are the same ones who'd turn on him the moment he didn't deliver game-defining moments at the back anytime we drop points. Memphis Depay was a sure thing before he came to the Premier League, wasn't he? And Sanchez was definitely worth the wages on swap with Mkhi when we signed him according to most on here.. whoops.
Then people say "this must be a briefing from the club" or "they're managing fans' expectations". Or maybe a journalist has decided to generate a huge clickbait article, such as we only have £100m to spend this summer, and other journalists have decided to join the bandwagon not to miss out on the clicks?
Personally I'm hoping the club have some hidden gems that they're targeted which the media are yet to pick up on and it wouldn't surprise me if that's the case - it's seemingly always been the way. But in the meantime can we at least have some sense here to discuss transfer tweets without taking them for complete gospel and making this thread ridiculously depressing to read?
It's insane how many times the point of SW has been explained in this thread in a span of about two months. Might as well put it in the OP at this point.
Maybe I'll be crucified for saying this (and possibly thread banned) but the state of this thread lately. It's incredible. Only a few people are looking objectively at the articles and thinking interesting but is it likely, or a journalist trying to drum up a non-story or just what I want to hear?
Some people in here are taking it for gospel that we're in for x player or y player when in previous years the media had no idea on our actual signings until negotiations were near the end. Sometimes there were protracted sagas (Pogba) and maybe I'm being forgetful but how many others dragged on? I'm also pretty confident that we haven't gone anywhere near the likes of Fernandes all summer (remind anyone of Gaitan?) or even Maguire. There's a big chance journalists are making lazy links or foreign media/clubs are trying to push transfers and supporters in here is using it as an excuse to attack the club.
Even looking at the De Ligt story - what solid link have we actually had that relates us to De Ligt? Personally I'd rather not sign a 19 year old defender for the ridiculous fee and wages being mentioned, and I imagine some on here who would are the same ones who'd turn on him the moment he didn't deliver game-defining moments at the back anytime we drop points. Memphis Depay was a sure thing before he came to the Premier League, wasn't he? And Sanchez was definitely worth the wages on swap with Mkhi when we signed him according to most on here.. whoops.
Then people say "this must be a briefing from the club" or "they're managing fans' expectations". Or maybe a journalist has decided to generate a huge clickbait article, such as we only have £100m to spend this summer, and other journalists have decided to join the bandwagon not to miss out on the clicks?
Personally I'm hoping the club have some hidden gems that they're targeted which the media are yet to pick up on and it wouldn't surprise me if that's the case - it's seemingly always been the way. But in the meantime can we at least have some sense here to discuss transfer tweets without taking them for complete gospel and making this thread ridiculously depressing to read?
Maybe I'll be crucified for saying this (and possibly thread banned) but the state of this thread lately. It's incredible. Only a few people are looking objectively at the articles and thinking interesting but is it likely, or a journalist trying to drum up a non-story or just what I want to hear?
Some people in here are taking it for gospel that we're in for x player or y player when in previous years the media had no idea on our actual signings until negotiations were near the end. Sometimes there were protracted sagas (Pogba) and maybe I'm being forgetful but how many others dragged on? I'm also pretty confident that we haven't gone anywhere near the likes of Fernandes all summer (remind anyone of Gaitan?) or even Maguire. There's a big chance journalists are making lazy links or foreign media/clubs are trying to push transfers and supporters in here is using it as an excuse to attack the club.
Even looking at the De Ligt story - what solid link have we actually had that relates us to De Ligt? Personally I'd rather not sign a 19 year old defender for the ridiculous fee and wages being mentioned, and I imagine some on here who would are the same ones who'd turn on him the moment he didn't deliver game-defining moments at the back anytime we drop points. Memphis Depay was a sure thing before he came to the Premier League, wasn't he? And Sanchez was definitely worth the wages on swap with Mkhi when we signed him according to most on here.. whoops.
Then people say "this must be a briefing from the club" or "they're managing fans' expectations". Or maybe a journalist has decided to generate a huge clickbait article, such as we only have £100m to spend this summer, and other journalists have decided to join the bandwagon not to miss out on the clicks?
Personally I'm hoping the club have some hidden gems that they're targeted which the media are yet to pick up on and it wouldn't surprise me if that's the case - it's seemingly always been the way. But in the meantime can we at least have some sense here to discuss transfer tweets without taking them for complete gospel and making this thread ridiculously depressing to read?
Maybe I'll be crucified for saying this (and possibly thread banned) but the state of this thread lately. It's incredible. Only a few people are looking objectively at the articles and thinking interesting but is it likely, or a journalist trying to drum up a non-story or just what I want to hear?
Some people in here are taking it for gospel that we're in for x player or y player when in previous years the media had no idea on our actual signings until negotiations were near the end. Sometimes there were protracted sagas (Pogba) and maybe I'm being forgetful but how many others dragged on? I'm also pretty confident that we haven't gone anywhere near the likes of Fernandes all summer (remind anyone of Gaitan?) or even Maguire. There's a big chance journalists are making lazy links or foreign media/clubs are trying to push transfers and supporters in here is using it as an excuse to attack the club.
Even looking at the De Ligt story - what solid link have we actually had that relates us to De Ligt? Personally I'd rather not sign a 19 year old defender for the ridiculous fee and wages being mentioned, and I imagine some on here who would are the same ones who'd turn on him the moment he didn't deliver game-defining moments at the back anytime we drop points. Memphis Depay was a sure thing before he came to the Premier League, wasn't he? And Sanchez was definitely worth the wages on swap with Mkhi when we signed him according to most on here.. whoops.
Then people say "this must be a briefing from the club" or "they're managing fans' expectations". Or maybe a journalist has decided to generate a huge clickbait article, such as we only have £100m to spend this summer, and other journalists have decided to join the bandwagon not to miss out on the clicks?
Personally I'm hoping the club have some hidden gems that they're targeted which the media are yet to pick up on and it wouldn't surprise me if that's the case - it's seemingly always been the way. But in the meantime can we at least have some sense here to discuss transfer tweets without taking them for complete gospel and making this thread ridiculously depressing to read?
Sorry to be a cnut but couldn't that just have been in one message, @Fridge chutney ?
I could have, but based on page 1 of the thread under section "Don't", mods seem to prefer 1 tweet per post rather than multiple per post. Happy to adjust going forward though!Sorry to be a cnut but couldn't that just have been in one message, @Fridge chutney ?