Yes,I think that can get more minutes,besides it seems that Lucas Vázquez has lost prominence.Are you sure that he'll get more minutes? Don't you think that you'll buy 1 or 2 offensive players this summer? Where will he fit in? Would he be ok with going out on a loan - would 1 more season change anything for him? But I've really liked what I've seen from him, even if I haven't watched a lot of RM games.
Madrid don't have too many CB.Vallejo will come back but is still very young to asume that will be an starter.Out of of that list, Varane is the only one I'd take. Is he available in the summer?
The transfers swapping top players never happen but a good amount of money +a squad player or a loan seems more realistic.You realize you're not signing a player from Granada or Empoli, right? There's no fecking way we'd agree to let one of our best players go for money + one of your fringe players. Mariano and Nacho? ffs man
The transfers swapping top players never happen but a good amount of money +a squad player or a loan seems more realistic.
Obviously I mean 75/80m€+ Nacho.
Personality I wouldn't pay more
Agreed, we won't get any Madrid player as part of the deal. We don't want their cast offs anyway.Point is why would any top clubs wants squad player in a swap deal? If anything they will just take the money than adding more deadwood.
Agreed, we won't get any Madrid player as part of the deal. We don't want their cast offs anyway.
Perhaps to "hide" the real cost of the player that bought alone would be more expensive.Point is why would any top clubs wants squad player in a swap deal? If anything they will just take the money than adding more deadwood.
Perhaps to "hide" the real cost of the player that bought alone would be more expensive.
Anyway,how much do you think that Kroos would cost?
If Pogba costs 100 then Kroos should be more.Young,with experience, a "final product" as posters use to say
Agreed, we won't get any Madrid player as part of the deal. We don't want their cast offs anyway.
If he is available I hope we look into getting him regardless of De Gea.Madrid don't have too many CB.Vallejo will come back but is still very young to asume that will be an starter.
But yes,he could be available.He is the kind of player that never looks totally happy in the club.
Not the first time that I heard the "I decided to stay","Zidane convinced me..." Blabla
But same thing can be said about De Gea. He's 26 and is arguably the best GK in the world and will only improve. That's why this swap deal story has surfaced as it would take a ridiculous amount of money to get him.Anyway,how much do you think that Kroos would cost?
If Pogba costs 100 then Kroos should be more.Young,with experience, a "final product" as posters use to say
Mourinho seems the type who will let players go if their mind is at another club though.
I can't remember him ever selling a player he didn't want to sell, I guess Zlatan at Inter could be the exception
What? NoReality is that Real Madrid have Zidane in charge now. He is a lot more sensible and doesn't seem to give in to Perez's will. He seems to be more influential than Perez himself so any unneeded transfers won't happen.
I didn't say that United have to buy Nacho,I just said that considering the needs of the squad It could be a good option.But why would ManUtd help to hide the cost of the player? So what you are saying is (not saying it'l happen but from your post) Madrid to sign our best player and the best GK in the PL and probably the world and then give us some shit player and somehow think ManUtd will accept this to "hide" the real cost of the player. What's the profit for ManUtd in this?
Re Kroos, I don't know how much he is worth. It doesn't work like if Pogba is X then Kroos should be X+.
Dybala signs new contract with Juve
I didn't say that United have to buy Nacho,I just said that considering the needs of the squad It could be a good option.
The other saleable players named have a very high market price.
As I said United should take the cash and buy somewhere else.
Nacho could be a very cheap substitute.
Of course if you think that we should pay 120m for de Gea,Kroos for De Gea,or 100+Varane the option of Nacho looks ridiculous.
We aren't getting Kroos. Best midfielder for the best team in the world, constantly challenging for CL, we already passed up on the chance to sign him/he turned us down, an absolute fantasy.Yep, Robben etc proved to be disastrous.
As would Kroos.
Yes. He asked for a raise and Perez didn't like him and chose to sell. Same thing happened with Di Maria. When Kroos asked for a raise last fall, he got £163k a week after tax(€21M a year, or £17.8M)Remember Makalele giorno?
No, he isn't. He's got a long way to go before he is in that bracket. I watch him a lot and hi is inconsistent.Wonder if there's a buyout clause? He's definitely worth Griezmann money.
No, he isn't. He's got a long way to go before he is in that bracket. I watch him a lot and hi is inconsistent.
A little surprised more wasn't made of the photo of him with Pogba on instagram on Sunday night baring in mind how much a tabloid sensationalises everything else.
I thought he told the whole world that a few weeks ago.
Don't think Kroos is a Mourinho type midfielder.
Don't think Kroos is a Mourinho type midfielder.
Or Wesley Sneijder who he built a CL winning team around...You mean like Cesc wasn't? Lampard wasn't? Maniche wasnt? Modric wasnt? Deco wasn't?
Some people seem to think Jose just plays big brutes in midfield.