Flytan
New Member
After being linked with Griezmann, James, Silva, and even Sanchez all year it would be the epitome of no UCL if we signed Perisic.
I dont know why, but somehow this transfer would make sense IMO. Cant explain, but Perisic looks like the typical Mourinho transfer to me.After being linked with Griezmann, James, Silva, and even Sanchez all year it would be the epitome of no UCL if we signed Perisic.
Oh it could certainly work out, but just from a "hype" perspective it wouldn't feel very good.I dont know why, but somehow this transfer would make sense IMO. Cant explain, but Perisic looks like the typical Mourinho transfer to me.
Edit: Or better too lazy, as beer and sun left ones mark.
He ticks a lot of boxes. Down to earth hard working guy..can play multiple positions and shouldnt need too much time to acclimatize. He would fit into that warrior type not being extravagant and selfish. He would just be temporary fix though and he isnt or wont become extraordinary or WC. He would be too expensive for a valuable squad player, but I ll keep an eye on that one.Oh it could certainly work out, but just from a "hype" perspective it wouldn't feel very good.
he passes the buck twice, he put the responsibility on the radio station in the first tweet and muddied the water with some bullshit in the second tweet so he's correct whatever happens.
Don't fecking sign mid-table lurkers like Perisic, Keane and Schmeichel.
Last summer, you knew you were getting quality with all our signings. Even with Bailly, it's true that not many people knew about him and he came from an upper/mid-table Spanish club but he did have a strong reputation from those who did know about him for having great potential at that young age. Nothing like Keane.
If we want to sign Keane just to replace Smalling/Jones as squad options, do we really see that as an equal transaction? What we would get for both Smalling and Jones combined would probably be about a quarter of the total we would have to pay Burnley for Keane. Is he really that worth it? Are we going to spend about 20-30m out of our summer budget on Michael Keane when we could really argue for about 6 upgrades to our current starting XI? That's quite a decent-sized gap in quality.
I would rather not sign anyone than pad our team full of squad players again. Our squad is absolutely full to the brim with squad players, just sign the starting-quality that we desperately need.
Having said all that, I'm hoping all of this is just silly season well and truly under way, and it's nothing more than that.
Or just, like, a sensible post.Another super scout in our boards. Joy
I would like to put Mertens there too, but I have always had a soft spot for him and was hoping Schalke would have recognized his potential before he left Holland.Keane and Perisic are top 6-level signings, not title contender signings.
It's not really a sensible post though is it. He brushes off Bailly by saying well he was highly regarded blah blah blah. Keane is very highly regarded and multiple top teams are interested in him. Teams that finished above us. Aside from that he was highly regarded by our staff, LVG notwithstanding, when he played for us. Basically that post is saying Bailly good because reasons, Keane bad because reasons.Or just, like, a sensible post.
The cnut knows what Biggleswade United are doing at all pissing times.Ballbag has been essentially useless the past 3 years. I don't think he has any clue what English clubs are actually doing
Don't fecking sign mid-table lurkers like Perisic, Keane and Schmeichel.
Last summer, you knew you were getting quality with all our signings. Even with Bailly, it's true that not many people knew about him and he came from an upper/mid-table Spanish club but he did have a strong reputation from those who did know about him for having great potential at that young age. Nothing like Keane.
If we want to sign Keane just to replace Smalling/Jones as squad options, do we really see that as an equal transaction? What we would get for both Smalling and Jones combined would probably be about a quarter of the total we would have to pay Burnley for Keane. Is he really that worth it? Are we going to spend about 20-30m out of our summer budget on Michael Keane when we could really argue for about 6 upgrades to our current starting XI? That's quite a decent-sized gap in quality.
I would rather not sign anyone than pad our team full of squad players again. Our squad is absolutely full to the brim with squad players, just sign the starting-quality that we desperately need.
Having said all that, I'm hoping all of this is just silly season well and truly under way, and it's nothing more than that.
Or just, like, a sensible post.
Another super scout in our boards. Joy
So a player that has improved himself greatly since he left us, has just been voted Burnley player of the season, and who could well improve a good deal yet under Jose, isn't an improvement on sick note Jones, and Smalling, who's distribution and ball control will always hinder him from becoming anything other than a average prem defender. Also by your calculations you'd be valuing Jones & Smalling at £6.25 million combined..?
It's just a lazy comparison imo, and a Keane and Bailly partnership could be just about right for us long term.
It's not really a sensible post though is it. He brushes off Bailly by saying well he was highly regarded blah blah blah. Keane is very highly regarded and multiple top teams are interested in him. Teams that finished above us. Aside from that he was highly regarded by our staff, LVG notwithstanding, when he played for us. Basically that post is saying Bailly good because reasons, Keane bad because reasons.
So, Liverpool signings?Keane and Perisic are top 6-level signings, not title contender signings.
More money than he'd get at Spurs.
The world has gone mad when an average player like Zaha is trying to make £110k a week... But I suppose when Lingard earns £100k other average players are going to fancy their chances.
That's the exact problem with your post. You are taking your conjecture as fact. Both are/were highly rated young players, if you're denying that, well I don't know what to say.Well yes, Bailly was considered to have more potential and a higher ceiling right before he moved to us, compared to Keane currently. Are you denying that?
And yes, there are in fact reasons why Bailly will most probably be the better player. Why is it strange that there are reasons a player might be better than another? Weird point.
My original post made the comparison to pre-emptively deny that Bailly was in the same situation as Keane with regards to coming from a mid-table club, that's it.
Have you ever in your life thought that one footballer was a better player than another?
How much do you think we would get for them if they were sold? I don't want either sold, for what it's worth. And unless Keane has a clause/a year left on his contract (which might well be the case) I think you might be underestimating how much Burnley will want for him.
More money than he'd get at Spurs.
Yes but it doesnt mean he wont be good for us.
That's the exact problem with your post. You are taking your conjecture as fact. Both are/were highly rated young players, if you're denying that, well I don't know what to say.
What are these reasons that Bailly will be the better player? For all we know he could fall off a cliff in performances, hell he's going through his worst period in a United shirt this month. Football is fluid, Keane is and has been a highly rated young centre back with United, English youth teams and now Burnley and has taken significant steps forward since getting regular game time. Keane has also played three times the amount of first team football than Bailly. He's much more of a known quantity to our scouts and our manager. But sure if you think he's not good enough he definitely must not be good enough, because of your superior scouting skills.
Have you ever in your life thought that one footballer was a better player than another?
How much do you think we would get for them if they were sold? I don't want either sold, for what it's worth. And unless Keane has a clause/a year left on his contract (which might well be the case) I think you might be underestimating how much Burnley will want for him.
Keane and Perisic are top 6-level signings, not title contender signings.