Klopper76
"Did you see Fabinho against Red Star & Cardiff?"
Worth a punt for that amount.
Chelsea had a £35M bid accepted in the summer but Barkley backed out - probably so he could get higher wages in a cut price move this month. Price was always going to be halved. Like with Sanchez: he was linked with a £60M move last summer and now it is half that if City sign him this month.
I suppose. It just seems a bit distorted how much prices fluctuate in such a short time.He had a full 12 month left though, if the scouse had waited until January then they wouldn't have paid 40m.
Why would we want him?
I think we could, should do better even if it's a small fee, which it is.Squad option for the central and offensive midfield
Not that bothered about this one. He’s got some good attributes as a midfielder but I think we can do better.
It’ll be a good move for him as well.
No shit.
Barkley has already turned down better wages at both Everton and Chelsea. Why? Because he wants to come to Spurs, play under Pochettino and believes he can/will break into our first XI.
So why is he going to sign for Arsenal or City or United simply because they also offer higher wages (and that's assuming that any of those clubs will actually want him)?
You might answer that he'd get a bigger signing-on bonus (in consideration of the fact that his transfer fee will be low in January, or zero as of next summer) than he'll get from Spurs. But I find it hard to believe that money is his over-riding motivation, given that he could now (if he'd signed for Chelsea) already be earning a lot more than he will be for the next 6 - 10 months at Everton.
I think he wants a step-up from Everton, to go where he thinks he'll get the best coaching and where he believes he'll stand a good chance of not just being mainly a bench-warmer. In his mind - in my opinion - that means Pochettino and Spurs.
Not worth the abuse I reckon moving across the City.Worth a punt for that amount.
In fairness Barkley might well have preferred Spurs. Spurs didn't want to pay for him, given he will be a free agent in the summer.
If so, seems like a poor decision, especially if the fee is only the rumoured £15m. Nowadays, dwindling contracts are normally a way to get players cheaper rather than a real opportunity to get them for free, since any decent player will get offers late in the contract.
Koeman is a twat. Treated our most creative player like absolute shit and now he wants to leave. Slightly pissed with Barkley in that he has took Koemans vendetta against him against the club when Everton have supported him throughout all of his ills.
Kluivert needs more time at AjaxWith Barkley most likely going to Chelsea, I wouldn't mind trying to get Loftus-Cheek in the summer as a more than capable Pogba backup. He would be a relatively cheaper CM option. Kluivert and Mahrez would be good alternatives for the RW.
Loftus-Cheek
Kluivert/ Mahrez
Dybala (marquee player)
I think we'll go all out to sign Dybala and that could be a reason why we've gone cold on the Sandro deal (apart from Luke Shaw recent resurgence). Although I like the look of Tierney though.
Pity we didnt try for that fee
A rat move from Barkley to that to his boyhood club.Chelsea had a £35M bid accepted in the summer but Barkley backed out - probably so he could get higher wages in a cut price move this month. Price was always going to be halved. Like with Sanchez: he was linked with a £60M move last summer and now it is half that if City sign him this month.
I am devastated. I have no doubt once he gets fully fit he's going to prove how good he is and we are going to regret this big time. You only have to look at the state of the team without him, we used to dominate all the other teams below us with him in the team now we can't even string 5 passes together and missing him is a big reason why.Koeman is a twat. Treated our most creative player like absolute shit and now he wants to leave. Slightly pissed with Barkley in that he has took Koemans vendetta against him against the club when Everton have supported him throughout all of his ills.
This will be like the Jack Rodwell to City move. Barkley will be at a mid table/bottom 6 club in a few years.
For 15 mill, i wouldn't mind us picking up Barkley, he's a good player.
Barkely? Really!?
£15million as well, should be like £10million.
Barkley is great all of a sudden now he is going to Chelsea
Hilarious right? He's bang average.
Possibly, 12 year olds are really insecure when signing contracts.Are they 12 years old?
Standard Caf, that. And the same people would be throwing tantrums if he was signing for us..
Barkely? Really!?
£15million as well, should be like £10million.
Barkley is great all of a sudden now he is going to Chelsea
Had he have been joining us he most certainly would have been called bang average.Hilarious right? He's bang average.