Indy football as a source? I may as we'll ask my 2 year old son
How dare you question the Mirrors authority!! When it comes to Dortmund; Mirror>Der WestenThe Mirror, no quotes. Definitely believable.
Feels like August in this thread with people over reacting to every little tweet. Surely everyone has leart that almost nothing on twitter can be believed.
It's all about the players wives instagram. That's how we sign players.
Or ignore everything @Mali_Zeus says and enjoy the roller coaster. NOOOOOOO!!! We're signing no one!
Zeus needs to be thread banned, he's seriously spoiling all the fun.
I regretted us not signing Alexis and still do now. I fear the same if we don't sign Memphis, Gundogan not so much
Alexis was a big miss for us. Would have finally are up for missing out on Hazard.
It's a bit confusing. Maybe he means that BVB have allowed him to leave at a certain price.
Also, isn't he supposed to keep 'off the record' stuff, you know, off the record?
What a load of shite. We're not splashing out 40+ million on a ''supersub''.
The stay on loan part makes me think that we might keep him on loan -- Monaco get him off their wage bill, we get to see if he actually comes good without making a massive commitment. Not a fan, but it's better than buying him outright (though buying someone like Lacazette or Dybala would be better altogether).
I rather not. If we have him for two years on loan that's like £24m altogether in wages. He's already been given half of that for doing nothing of note.
I don't want to slate the French league, because it has produced some starts. But I think, along with the Dutch league, it's a place to build yourself up and then move on towards the big leagues. De Bryune is at the stage of his career now where he needs to stay in the big leagues and become the best player he can be. It would be infuriating to see such a player go there - he's too good for that.
The stay on loan part makes me think that we might keep him on loan -- Monaco get him off their wage bill, we get to see if he actually comes good without making a massive commitment. Not a fan, but it's better than buying him outright (though buying someone like Lacazette or Dybala would be better altogether).
Don't see the point of De Bruyne going to PSG unless they getting rid of Veratti or Mathuidi.
Keeping Falcao to be a super sub would be the biggest waste of money.
What? verratti would play deeper and de brunye would play as a 10 which is his preferred position. dont know why you think they would sell matuidi or verratti because of de bruyne.Don't see the point of De Bruyne going to PSG unless they getting rid of Veratti or Mathuidi.
You could probably get 9 or 10 goals out of Wilson, given roughly the same number of games . You'd definitely get them from Chicharito. We'd even get them from Ings, though I'm not at all convinced he's the answer. From what I know, Falcao's contract is net, so we'd probably have to pay him around £15m a season to stink the place up. I can't see it.If Monaco are that desperate to get rid of him, let us have him for £15mil. His 9 or 10 goals over a whole season would probably be worth that price in todays day and age.