Cassidy
No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2013
- Messages
- 32,945
Why would the Glazers veto a transfer?
They have final say on all spending don't they?
Why would the Glazers veto a transfer?
They have final say on all spending don't they?
This 10 times over he's a self centred agent who's only interested in money, what could he possibly bring to the table at FIFA??Wow, fighting corruption and self-interest with more corruption and self-interest. Well, I assume anyway.
Probably leaked by Chelsea to force Fiorentina to lower their valuation.No Cuadrado then?
Yeah, slide tackles them into the box.But can he take corners?
Yeah, slide tackles them into the box.
As long as he stays fit it'll probably be an improvement. Worked with Rojo even though he's had a few knocks.Is he better than what we have already got though? And will he just be a stop gap until the Summer and then just become a squad member? (if LvG can get who he wants in the Summer)
Feck sakes
That claim's made just in case the transfer doesn't go through. They can say, it was on but Glazers refused it.Why would the Glazers veto a transfer?
How the feck do Chelsea do this?!
They paid about £18 million for him, and 30 million euros is about £22 million. So not much difference really.
In a week where United have been declared the second richest club in the world based on revenue (and way above the pack in England) it's inevitable that spend spend spend mentalities will come through the British Media.The papers seem really desperate for us to enter the transfer market - they must be as bored off their tits as we all are with this transfer window.
Like Balotelli was a shining beacon of excellent behaviour.I can't. He's a bad egg.
But surely his market value has dipped by a fair bit, he's not exactly shone at Chelsea. Granted he's not been given too many opportunities to do so.
I love this thread.
Woodward claimed as much.Looks like we'll be having a quiet January