Pippa
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2013
- Messages
- 1,258
Looks decent although I think Verón was better further up the pitch. Here's mine:
I had both versions, the other one similar to yours with Albertini. But it looks so weird in these teamsheets, I can't really explain why . It shouldn't matter that much if you flank your playmaker with two box to box midfielders?Looks decent although I think Verón was better further up the pitch. Here's mine:
No it really shouldn't matter much. I think it looks great man you pulled a very nice team..I had both versions, the other one similar to yours with Albertini. But it looks so weird in these teamsheets, I can't really explain why . It shouldn't matter that much if you flank your playmaker with two box to box midfielders?
Mentally strongHow is Kluivert, hell even Falcao better than Adriano...
@Pippa and Aldo, how highly would you rate Adriano in a list of all the strikers in the draft? Is there anyone you'd put under him(if so, who?), or is he the weakest striker in the draft?I think when we said we consider players at their peaks, it didn't mean completely forget what happened before and after...
I don't think Torres, Tevez, Aguero, Cavani should be rated higher as Adriano.From the ones picked I'd only put Lewandowski under him.
@Pippa and Aldo, how highly would you rate Adriano in a list of all the strikers in the draft? Is there anyone you'd put under him(if so, who?), or is he the weakest striker in the draft?
I don't think Torres, Tevez, Aguero, Cavani should be rated higher as Adriano.
I rate Adriano's peak higher than theirs and don't believe they had a big enough longterm impact to make up for that gap.As in talent, or what they actually scored in a season?
Cavani perhaps but not the other three.I don't think Torres, Tevez, Aguero, Cavani should be rated higher as Adriano.
I agree on Tevez, but even during his peak you can't be sure that he might not prefer to play golf in Southamerica during the season. That should count against him as well, if Adriano's fall counts so much.Cavani perhaps but not the other three.
Tevez in particular gets a lot of heat on here due to his antics but as a player he's nothing short of top value to have in any team. A rare breed of players who despite whatever goes on outside, steps in and always gives 200%. City were absolutely stupid to sell him, specially how he provided balance to an otherwise all out attacking front 4 they have.
Really? Tevez has done great for most part of his career wherever he's been. South American player of the year three years running. West Ham Player of the year in his first season at England. Was absolutely vital for us specially with his late goals in crucial situations. Had a successful spell with City while being one of their best performers and now he's having a storming season at Juve. He's a quality player and bring a never say die attitude.I rate Adriano's peak higher than theirs and don't believe they had a high enough longterm impact to make up for that gap.
As I said even during times when he wasn't having a great time off the pitch he never let it hamper his game. Fergie sidelined him completely for Berba in 08-09, but he gave his all in the little time he got.I agree on Tevez, but even during his peak you can't be sure that he might not prefer to play golf in Southamerica during the season. That should count against him as well, if Adriano's fall counts so much.
Obviously, no one can question what he did during those couple of years but then came the downwards spiral...Adriano at his best was a blend of extraordinary shooting power, indomitable strength and size, class dribbling ability, pace, and even a worthy aerial threat from headers.
the only thing is his best form was so short. but if you talk about adriano's best, he was not someone to pale to many.
Why not? If you're only supposed to consider them at their peaks, why would you look at what happened before or after it? It's not like I picked Adriano because of how good he was in 2007, or kps took Torres based on how well he has done at Chelsea.I think when we said we consider players at their peaks, it didn't mean completely forget what happened before and after...
We consider the player at their peak, yes but the career before and after his peak play in part as well. We have to give credit to players who stayed consistent for a decade as compared to 1/2 season wonders.Adriano would be in the bottom places obviously, I saw him as a first round CF only. He's higher than the likes of Cavani, Inzaghi, Rooney, Aguero, Lewandowski, and Torres IMO.
Why not? If you're only supposed to consider them at their peaks, why would you look at what happened before or after it? It's not like I picked Adriano because of how good he was in 2007, or kps took Torres based on how well he has done at Chelsea.
And it's not like it was a purple patch for Adriano anyways, it was close to 30 or so months where he was playing to an incredibly high level.
Which were Adriano's peak years? Around 04-05? How much did he score then?
To be fair over three years (2003, 2004, 2005) he would be as good as almost any CF available. If my quick calculations are right, in those three years he had 110 starts, scored 83 goals, and assisted 21 goals. Golden Boot + Top Scorer at 2004 Copa América, Golden Boot + Top Scorer at 2005 Confederations Cup are decent in that span as well.
After about 35 minutes, I've finally found Adriano's goals and assists numbers from 2002-2005.
Serie A: 102 starts, 67 goals, 21 assists
Coppa Italia*: 1 start, 2 goals
UEFA Cup: 1 start, 1 goal
Champions League: 13 starts, 14 goals, 5 assists
Total (club): 117 starts, 84 goals, 26 assists
Confederations Cup: 8 starts, 7 goals, 1 assist
Copa América: 6 starts, 7 goals
WCQ: 3 starts, 1 goal
Total (nation): 16 starts, 15 goals, 1 assist
* not sure if there are more, will look later.
Oh dear, what have you done.Which were Adriano's peak years? Around 04-05? How much did he score then?
So my final team:
Van der Sar
Piszczek -- de Boer -- Stam -- Alaba
Petit -- Seedorf
Luis Enrique -- Rui Costa -- Giggs
Vieri
Two things because ill save most for the matchday thread -
1. Do you really think your midfield is as good as mine? Petit is better than Emerson, Seedorf is different type of player than Cesc but reached greater hights and is more proven at CM(Cesc plays for Barca higher up the pitch) and if you think you can compare Rui Costa with Rooney who isn't even a real AM I think you are completely overrating your players.
2. Varane played magnificently against Messi last year I agree, but overall he's not proven because he played amazing for a few games than became mediocre(but still good for his age), and since his injury he haven't been a starter and Pepe and Ramos are being chosen over him constantly. Wouldn't call that proven
Kluivert's problem is that the likes of Christian Vieri was getting picked up in the bargain bin at the end of the draft. His other problem is that he never scored as heavily as dozens of strikers who managers could also select. But as a technically and tactically gifted target man and foil for a top banana number 10, there are few better.Mentally strong
Just kidding, they just seem more balanced to me, I know it might not make sense but that's just the way it goes for me.
re. Kluivert, how come no one seems to ever get him in these drafts? He was great at his peak.
Adriano would be in the bottom places obviously, I saw him as a first round CF only. He's higher than the likes of Cavani, Inzaghi, Rooney, Aguero, Lewandowski, and Torres IMO.
Why not? If you're only supposed to consider them at their peaks, why would you look at what happened before or after it? It's not like I picked Adriano because of how good he was in 2007, or kps took Torres based on how well he has done at Chelsea.
And it's not like it was a purple patch for Adriano anyways, it was close to 30 or so months where he was playing to an incredibly high level.
The plan at the moment. Any comments?
I can't see itYes to both. Your weaklink is your spine of Deboer-Petit-Seedorf-Costa-Vieri and it will be exposed to great effect in the upcoming match.
Yeah but he never gets picked anyway for these drafts, it's not just this one where he's gone missing.Kluivert's problem is that the likes of Christian Vieri was getting picked up in the bargain bin at the end of the draft. His other problem is that he never scored as heavily as dozens of strikers who managers could also select. But as a technically and tactically gifted target man and foil for a top banana number 10, there are few better.
Has no one ever done an Ajax '95 theme?Yeah but he never gets picked anyway for these drafts, it's not just this one where he's gone missing.