Pippa
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2013
- Messages
- 1,258
When the draft list gets fixed I will bid for Silva and Figo. Hopefully we can add the new batch of players ASAP
I agree it speeds it up but as kps said it is the wrong way to do it, why so impatient? Bids have been getting raised all day long and soon people would have bid for them while staying in their budget.Which basically shows people should move on and keep bidding as everyone is well aware most of my bids would get raised and I wouldn't ever actually have a budget issue unless everyone goes into inertia for 24hs.
Point made, i will only bid on a few players at a time. Watch the paint dry as we extend this forever. The quicker we get to the price people would stop bidding for players at the quicker we can move on to the next bunch of players.
When the draft list gets fixed I will bid for Silva and Figo. Hopefully we can add the new batch of players ASAP
When the average spend of each manager per player is 27.2m, (and there's bucketloads of good players around) those are the prices they go for. You came in and raised each 'most wanted' player's price by around 10m instead, with no hint of any plan to form a team. Of course you have an inflationary agenda!
If you're really bothered about 'righteous' prices, why haven't you made bids for Adriano, Gonzalez, Joaquin, Mendieta, Cambiasso, Gary Neville, Marcelo, Abidal, Zambrotta, Carvalho, Lucio and all the keepers? They're 'worth' more, too? A late sneaky bid for these names when you have been relieved of your current 'team', perhaps?
Edit: Feck it, this discussion is pointless. You've made your move, we need to make ours.
I get the problem you're trying to avoid, but I don't think what you're doing is the right way to fix that problem.Which basically shows people should move on and keep bidding as everyone is well aware most of my bids would get raised and I wouldn't ever actually have a budget issue unless everyone goes into inertia for 24hs.
Point made, i will only bid on a few players at a time. Watch the paint dry as we extend this forever. The quicker we get to the price people would stop bidding for players at the quicker we can move on to the next bunch of players.
But you don't have the right to do that, as you don't have the money for it. There are 16 managers, why have you taken the whole burden upon yourself and invited confusion for no reason?I didn't.
I haven't bid on Adriano because while he is a bargain i ahve no interest in having him as my triker.
Do you? Go ahead then. That's one of my gripes with coming here and finding the list is already set for me, I would have loved to sneak a 10M banker like that one. Just not that one
I did bid for a keeper, and I did make a point of pointing out I would come back for defenders later. You are arguing over nothing really, this is exactly why I'm fed up with this game. "You have an agenda, you have an agenda". Bollocks to that, I made completely reasonable bids for players and most of them would be absolute bargains at the prices I bid.
Going to go for Lúcio's partner...and not Demichelis. The other Argentinian. I can't resist not getting Figo.
But you don't have the right to do that, as you don't have the money for it. There are 16 managers, why have you taken the whole burden upon yourself and invited confusion for no reason?
It's not about minding someone else's business. I don't even have any problem with the prices you took those players to, that's not the point. The point is this way it becomes completely random and no strategy can be involved. You would just have players falling from bankrupt managers and there's no way to plan for that. For example if someone is saving money in this set of players knowing most of them will go for high thinking later on he will have more in his accounts and more chance of winning bidding wars, he won't as remaining budget has no part to play in bidding anymore, which is what is completely wrong.There's nothing confusing about it. All we need is for you guys to stop minding everyone else's business and focus on bidding on players you are interested in if the price is right. I'm already down to 278M and I have the money.
Incredible how that happened, you would never imagine, would you?
At 15.46 but it's been ignored the entire time after thatR. Pires - 29M - Pippa - 15.46
FAO all managers suspend bidding now
@antohan , thanks for filling the vacancy, we understand you were not that keen on participation but nevertheless offered to help if no one is available, we will arrange for a replacement, appreciate it
The manager replacing Anto will decide whether to keep his bids, if not, they revert to the previous bidder. I will tidy up the list for bidding to resume when that's done
Calling out applications for one managerial vacancy
At 15.46 but it's been ignored the entire time after that
It's not about minding someone else's business. I don't even have any problem with the prices you took those players to, that's not the point. The point is this way it becomes completely random and no strategy can be involved. You would just have players falling from bankrupt managers and there's no way to plan for that. For example if someone is saving money in this set of players knowing most of them will go for high thinking later on he will have more in his accounts and more chance of winning bidding wars, he won't as remaining budget has no part to play in bidding anymore, which is what is completely wrong.
I'm sure Pol made the rule for those who were unfortunate to get caught in a bidding war and their rival pulled out and they didn't have any money left, basically an exception, not for intentional manipulation of the whole mechanic and making it a farce.
At 15.46 but it's been ignored the entire time after that
What? I don't care about that, I didn't bid for any of the top players, not in the earlier thread, not now. Rivaldo was sitting at 20 for ages, I would've bid for him then, no? You are misunderstanding me, it's not about the prices, fine inflate them, in fact that's one of the great part about auction, just do it staying in your budget so that it's an even field all along, what's the difficult thing in doing that? Everyone was doing that till now.No farse. You are worrying about potential cut-price players further down the line, etc. None of that will happen.
What's the problem? I have the money to meet all my bids. Weren't you all for wheeling dealing like in real life and managers paying for their mistakes?
What? I don't care about that, I didn't bid for any of the top players, not in the earlier thread, not now. Rivaldo was sitting at 20 for ages, I would've bid for him then, no? You are misunderstanding me, it's not about the prices, fine inflate them, in fact that's one of the great part about auction, just do it staying in your budget so that it's an even field all along, what's the difficult thing in doing that? Everyone was doing that till now.
Managers who make mistakes yes but managers who don't care about losing and taking everything down with them? No
You were not keen anyway so we relieve you of this unwanted job, win win for everyone
Managers who make mistakes yes but managers who don't care about losing and taking everything down with them? No
You were not keen anyway so we relieve you of this unwanted job, win win for everyone
He does have a point though...all those players were under-valued and all he did was move it along. Saving us a few hours.
Managers who make mistakes yes but managers who don't care about losing and taking everything down with them? No
You were not keen anyway so we relieve you of this unwanted job, win win for everyone
He does have a point though...all those players were under-valued and all he did was move it along. Saving us a few hours.
That was my only point, in case you think I'm sad about losing those top players, not at all. I would hardly ever bid 100 for one players, as good as he can be. My point simply was that remaining budget should play the biggest part in bidding, and that is where managing your money and implementing a strategy related to that comes into effect and keeps the game interesting.I mentioend to Balu earlier. Point taken, you all seem to get your knickiers in a twist over that so I wouldn't go over budget again.
Anyhow, moving on.
He does have a point though...all those players were under-valued and all he did was move it along. Saving us a few hours.