Annahnomoss
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2012
- Messages
- 10,101
That is a good idea actually the variations/Bench. We will see what everybody says.
It won't work. Someone like Schuster should lose TP status but Tigana should not since he got picked?I wouldn't change the TP system in general, however I agree with the point that future reinforcement rounds might get a bit boring. My suggestion would be to make some of the unpicked TPs (or all of them) loose their TP status. There are several players who got the wrong end of the stick here, players that were deemed not good enough for the latter rounds in previous drafts despite clearly being good enough. We could find 8 names that make sense from the still available and soon to be available TPs (the ones from the loosing teams in this round) that could go from being TP to not being TP and therefore make the draft more interesting. Rummenigge, Hagi, Rui Costa, Schuster really shouldn't be TP rated, imo.
We could agree on 8 players, or maybe let a neutral decide, so we don't have a conflict of interest with the managers still in the draft choosing players they need. anto and Pat and the loosing managers from this round could decide on those 8 players. Then all of a sudden, there's one interesting new upgrade available for every team without destroying the idea of this draft.
The TP list won't ever be a true reflection of quality and it's hardly fair at the moment. Schuster losing TP status would mean that you could for example replace Tigana and free up TP points to improve the team in the later rounds, bring in a TP defender. I don't think it'll benefit a single team more than anyone else. Your strategy of paying a lot for your not TP wingers is still worth a lot, that won't change.It won't work. Someone like Schuster should lose TP status but Tigana should not since he got picked?
It won't work. Someone like Schuster should lose TP status but Tigana should not since he got picked?
Think me and Stobzilla are tomorrow anyway. My writeup is sent
Stobzilla hasn't sent his so we are waiting for that.
Has Isotope sent his? I'll have mine done soon.
Waiting for Kazi's write-up and then I can start it before I leave in the morning. If Kazi doesn't send it in before 07:00 UK time I would suggest you to find someone else to do it as I most likely won't be home until late.
I wouldn't change the TP system in general, however I agree with the point that future reinforcement rounds might get a bit boring. My suggestion would be to make some of the unpicked TPs (or all of them) lose their TP status. There are several players who got the wrong end of the stick here, players that were deemed not good enough for the latter rounds in previous drafts despite clearly being good enough. We could find 8 names that make sense from the still available and soon to be available TPs (the ones from the losing teams in this round) that could go from being TP to not being TP and therefore make the draft more interesting. Rummenigge, Hagi, Rui Costa, Schuster really shouldn't be TP rated, imo.
We could agree on 8 players, or maybe let a neutral decide, so we don't have a conflict of interest with the managers still in the draft choosing players they need. anto and Pat and the losing managers from this round could decide on those 8 players. Then all of a sudden, there's one interesting new upgrade available for every team without destroying the idea of this draft.
I asked @NoPace twice here when he wants to play, but he didn't respond . He's posting in other threads though, no idea what he ignores me.What about the other matches?
Looks like Cutch-Stob's cant happen today since Cutch won't be about.
What else is left?
NoPace vs Balu/Mendez
Pippa vs trippy
walkinhop vs Annah
We need to start two of these today!
What about the other matches?
Looks like Cutch-Stob's cant happen today since Cutch won't be about.
What else is left?
NoPace vs Balu/Mendez
Pippa vs trippy
walkinhop vs Annah
We need to start two of these today!
Yes. This stage needs to finish by Tuesday. Then we have auction. QF. Mini auction. SF. Auction. FinalHopefully this doesn't drag too much as the WC is about to start in a couple of weeks and ideally it would be good to finish this before that. The last few games get less activity as it is but with the WC fever hitting the caf the threads won't survive the homepage for 5 minutes.
The tp points we would add would be 2-3 so your wingers value won't decrease at all really.@Annahnomoss @Balu
First regarding the Tigana/Schuster issue. Whole point is that the TP list was drawn up from the beginning and everyone knew what it was, even though there were some glaring issues with it. To change it now and remove players of similar quality to those that sold is wrong to teams that spent big or small on those talents. If someone choose to spent 2 TP on a top CB and now you take Forster off the TP list and someone gets him as a non TP is inherently wrong to the team that chose to spend his TP points on a CB.
Secondly, ofcourse the strategy of buying non TP players higher would be affected. If we knew that more attacking talent would be freed from TP list in latter round, we would not have spent so much on Boniek or Conti. How can any one argue otherwise?
Now I had raised the 12 TP issue being extended for future rounds when the bidding started. At that time everyone in unison told me no. Infact Balu himself said if someone feels likes of Rummeinge/Robbery are seen as worthy of being 6TP they will be bought otherwise no. So now to turn around and propose doing so is most definitely wrong. It is going to punish teams that planned properly for their TPs.
Frankly all these changing in rules in an ongoing draft is one of the reason why all the controversial stuff happens. Everyone knows what the rules are and is going along well. Makes no sense to change it about now
The tp points we would add would be 2-3 so your wingers value won't decrease at all really.