Spoony
The People's President
feck him and feck the tired stupid show.
Hear here. I hate the cnut.
feck him and feck the tired stupid show.
Car banter is lifting anyway...
But on a serious note, albeit I wasn't really joking at all, Clarkson has the BBC by the nutsack to a certain degree. I think he's a prize wanker but I can see the appeal.
You would imagine other broadcasters will be interested in a similar kind of show, although Jonathan Ross, Adrian Chiles and Christine Bleakley all serve as reminders that the BBC isn't such a bad gig after all.
they should get Woody involved
Just about sums up my view on it. He's a detestable bloke, anyone else caught punching a colleague would've already been fired (that's without mentioning his past use of racist terms on air).I do.
In an age where the slightest faux pas gets an army of twitter and facebook trolls baying for blood with their pretend outrage, we have Clarkson allegedly punching somebody and people are signing petitions to keep his show on the air. This is after racism incidents and a tasteless stunt in Argentina which poked fun at the Falklands War.
I don't get it.
What's the appeal?
Sadly no. I work for a TV station. A reporter dragged an editor outside at a staff party and kicked his ass. The editor sued and gave the station an ultimatum. The station did nothing so the editor quit. Guy isn't even a good reporter, he's dull as hell, is not a nice man unless you're a female and has anger management and alcohol problems. Companies can be so scummy.Just about sums up my view on it. He's a detestable bloke, anyone else caught punching a colleague would've already been fired (that's without mentioning his past use of racist terms on air).
I always knew Jon Snow was a cnut.Sadly no. I work for a TV station. A reporter dragged an editor outside at a staff party and kicked his ass. The editor sued and gave the station an ultimatum. The station did nothing so the editor quit. Guy isn't even a good reporter, he's dull as hell, is not a nice man unless you're a female and has anger management and alcohol problems. Companies can be so scummy.
Never knew he was a Chavs fan, I thought he hated football.
The two aren't mutually exclusiveNever knew he was a Chavs fan, I thought he hated football.
Top Gear could survive without Clarkson but in a different format. Plus, I can't see Hammond and May sticking around without him.
This will all blow over and they'll be back with a new series in the summer or next year, while the haters will have their usual fix of X-factor and Kim Kardashian to get excited about in the meantime.
Drop in the ocean, the BBC is vast.The thing is he is a commodity who make the BBC fortunes, in the same way Chavs can't sack Terry for being a racist, the BBC would find it very difficult to sack Clarkson for punching someone.
Top Gear is their most profitable asset.Drop in the ocean, the BBC is vast.
Never said it wasn't.Top Gear is their most profitable asset.
I think this plays a role though. They do seem to fancy him as a documentary maker.The thing that most annoys me about Clarkson is that he's actually a very capable presenter/journalist when he puts his mind to it. If you've ever seen him talk about something he has a passion for its genuinely good to watch and he can produce some very articulate pieces.
Hence his laziness with some of the shit he puts out is very frustrating. It's too easy to cobble together some half arsed scripted nonsense and throw in the odd controversial comment knowing it'll get viewers.
You seemed to suggest that losing it would be a drop in the ocean, which it clearly wouldn't.Never said it wasn't.
I was talking about Clarkson not Top Gear. He is a drop in the ocean. Top Gear presumably makes most of it's money through syndication abroad and by selling the format to other countries. Why would that money be lost? You really think mr. or mrs. general director of a TV channel in Lithuania or wherever gives a shit whether or not he still works there and will cancel the show?You seemed to suggest that losing it would be a drop in the ocean, which it clearly wouldn't.
There would definitely be an impact if Clarkson took tweedle dee and tweedle dumb over to Sky.I was talking about Clarkson not Top Gear. He is a drop in the ocean. Top Gear presumably makes most of it's money through syndication abroad and by selling the format to other countries. Why would that money be lost? You really think mr. or mrs. general director of a TV channel in Lithuania or wherever gives a shit whether or not he still works there and will cancel the show?
There would, in the UK and in the short term. They'd still make bucket loads of money abroad. And how do we know the other two bell ends would jump ship? They've both got great relationships with the beeb and host other shows on it.There would definitely be an impact if Clarkson took tweedle dee and tweedle dumb over to Sky.
Tiff Needell and Fifth Gear suggest that there's more to Top Gear than just the show format. Love him or loathe him, Clarkson's schtik is central to Top Gear's success.I was talking about Clarkson not Top Gear. He is a drop in the ocean. Top Gear presumably makes most of it's money through syndication abroad and by selling the format to other countries. Why would that money be lost? You really think mr. or mrs. general director of a TV channel in Lithuania or wherever gives a shit whether or not he still works there and will cancel the show?
I'm no great fan of the presenters, but I signed the petition because I like the show and want to see it continue.
It would probably hurt because I work for myself.What would happen to you if you punched your boss at work?
There is one problem with your argument. You dont actually know for certain what the actual facts are for this situation at this point. However you like many others on both sides of the debate have come up with a clear opinion on what should happen.He should be sacked, it's racist gaff and bigotry controversy after controversy and then all explained away as 'just a joke'. How many times does someone have to make jokes of a similar ilk before people think "Actually, this bloke might be racist"? My Facebook feed is awash with country bumpkins from Cumbria all ignoring the facts about Clarkson's behaviour and demanding people sign the petition to have him re-instated as it's against his human rights, or 'political correctness gone mad'. It's like arguing with the people who deny climate change, much of whom I imagine signed the petition as well if they are not indeed the same people.