JustAFan
The Adebayo Akinfenwa of football photoshoppers
Overall a very slow start to the window. Even De Gea is still with us.Our rivals are doing no better. That should be the measure of whether we should be concerned or not IMO.
Overall a very slow start to the window. Even De Gea is still with us.Our rivals are doing no better. That should be the measure of whether we should be concerned or not IMO.
How do you know we have not made progress?Given the talk about "unlimited funds" and "getting our business done early" I would have expected us to at least have made inroads. So far we haven't.
We'll have wrapped up 4 transfer within the next two weeks. Mark my words.
Given the talk about "unlimited funds" and "getting our business done early" I would have expected us to at least have made inroads. So far we haven't.
LvG said it was our goal but he has been around a while and might know it is not just up to us right?I think the manager cares. He seems to be ruling the roost and if Ed doesn't do what he has been asked to do, then in private the proverbial shit will hit the proverbial fan.
Hush you Memphis does not count anymore.When has anyone from United talked about getting business done early this summer? Any quotes or links of LVG or Woodward saying this?
We have signed Depay so have made in roads in this summer's transfer business.
Even though this is a negative post, I only took the positive that there's only 35 days until our first league game from it35 days to our first league game, 10 days until we fly out to the USA and people still saying we have a lot of time to sign players.
Feels like this should be accompanied with some sort of punishment if it doesn't happen. Your tagline can't get any worse though so not sure what...We'll have wrapped up 4 transfer within the next two weeks. Mark my words.
2: We often overpay for our players.
...
I mean just look at last season, not a single good deal that we made.
...
The fact we have money doesn't justify overspending for every fecker with 2 legs out there.
On one hand we have posters saying we are low balling on some of our targets and we should just pay what the selling club wants. On the other hand we have all the complaints about us always overpaying.
Can't please everyone that is for sure.
Certainly hope not. If they are a public flogging is in order.It's the same who are complaining both ways.
Certainly hope not. If they are a public flogging is in order.
Do they not realize it or are they wumming?Just look carefully, some of the posters complaining about United overpaying and Woodward not being able to negotiate a bargain are the same complaining about the lack of arrivals before the preseason.
Do they not realize it or are they wumming?
A broken collarbone doesn't equal a failed medical. It can only be problematic if Hernandez is still using medicine (which won't be the whole length of the transfer window) or if he has potential problems around that region with lymfenodes. If his medical history and blood tests are fine and no abnormalities are found elsewhere it doesn't matter that a broken bone lights up (hotspot) during nuclear imaging, CT most likely can rule out any potential doubts.
They should be punished more than .Rossi!Sometimes you are just driven by the muppet inside you.
It's the Caf, come on you know us by now.On one hand we have posters saying we are low balling on some of our targets and we should just pay what the selling club wants. On the other hand we have all the complaints about us always overpaying.
Can't please everyone that is for sure.
On one hand we have posters saying we are low balling on some of our targets and we should just pay what the selling club wants. On the other hand we have all the complaints about us always overpaying.
Can't please everyone that is for sure.
No no
1 We should identify our targets in time and make a prioritzed list with alternatives on it
2 We should determine our budget and see how much we can/want to spend on each target given that budget and our own valuation of what that they player is worth in the current market
3 We should inquire how much the other club is looking for to let the player go
4 If that amount is lower than what we can/want to spend for that player we should just offer them what they are looking for (or close to it)
5 If that amount is more than what we can/want to spend on the player we should make them a take it or leave it offer that is the max amount we can/want to spend on the player
6 If the club rejects that take it or leave it offer than you move to the next target on your list
If you follow those 6 simple rules you should end up signing the players you need for decent price given the assumption that:
-You can prioritze the right targets (quality you need and realistcally available)
-You can properly value a player and determine how much you can and should spend on them
-You can negotiate well to find out the real amount a club is looking for to let a player go (they won't always tell you right away)
-You started preparations early and in time (done your homework)
-You know how to propspect the market to have a good idea what is out there
-You know what you need as a club
If other clubs manage to get good players on time and for good prices and you consistently end up either overpaying for players, end up with the wrong players or can't get your players on time because negotiations always seem to drag on for far too long you are doing one of those things wrong.
And if you compare us with other clubs:
-We pay a very high price for the quality we get
-We are amongst the slower clubs to wrap up deals
-We seem to end up alot of the time with the wrong players
In theory there is nothing wrong with us paying a high price for a player as long as we can afford it and believe the player is worth it. But if we are willing to pay that price we should on one hand be able to get deals way faster and way earlier and the concerned players should end up proving to be worth it.
Example:
We scout player X and determine he is target nr 1 for the summer
We value him a £30m given market circumstances
We end up signing the player but need 2 months of negotiating to get it done because we have made various offers of £20m, £25m £30m etc and all of them have been rejected and in the end up paying £40m for the player. We have done a very bad deal. We have overpaid £10m and wasted 2 months getting it done.
We should have informed about player X and learned that they were searching for more than £30m, if they reject that we should have focussed on another target.
Problem is United seem to not know exactly what they want, not sure they fully know what is really out there and who is realistic and who is not, not sure we can properly value our targets and stick with that valuation and we seem to be bad quite bad a negotiating because we never end up with what we wanted or either we end up paying too much or we get it far too late.
What's really funny is he thinks it is all so easy and he knows how it all works. Like LvG and company have no idea how to make a transfer, amazing we sign anyone. Though if he was in charge we probably would end up with out 10th choice or worse if any player or agent would even talk to him.That reminds me of Moyes times, i pad technology and white boards of his)
To me that's a public coded message to Woodward to get the job done. Surely basic common sense dictates that getting new players in, where possible - given that the Copa America isn't finished yet - should be the number one priority if we're to hit the ground running when the league starts.Hush you Memphis does not count anymore.
http://www.thesportreview.com/tsr/2...s-louis-van-gaal-wants-deals-concluded-early/
In this article LvG does say it is important to get done quickly but the quote ends with him only saying he HOPES we can get done quickly.
No ultimatum. No promise. Just a hope.
No no
1 We should identify our targets in time and make a prioritzed list with alternatives on it
2 We should determine our budget and see how much we can/want to spend on each target given that budget and our own valuation of what that they player is worth in the current market
3 We should inquire how much the other club is looking for to let the player go
4 If that amount is lower than what we can/want to spend for that player we should just offer them what they are looking for (or close to it)
5 If that amount is more than what we can/want to spend on the player we should make them a take it or leave it offer that is the max amount we can/want to spend on the player
6 If the club rejects that take it or leave it offer than you move to the next target on your list
If you follow those 6 simple rules you should end up signing the players you need for decent price given the assumption that:
-You can prioritze the right targets (quality you need and realistcally available)
-You can properly value a player and determine how much you can and should spend on them
-You can negotiate well to find out the real amount a club is looking for to let a player go (they won't always tell you right away)
-You started preparations early and in time (done your homework)
-You know how to propspect the market to have a good idea what is out there
-You know what you need as a club
If other clubs manage to get good players on time and for good prices and you consistently end up either overpaying for players, end up with the wrong players or can't get your players on time because negotiations always seem to drag on for far too long you are doing one of those things wrong.
And if you compare us with other clubs:
-We pay a very high price for the quality we get
-We are amongst the slower clubs to wrap up deals
-We seem to end up alot of the time with the wrong players
In theory there is nothing wrong with us paying a high price for a player as long as we can afford it and believe the player is worth it. But if we are willing to pay that price we should on one hand be able to get deals way faster and way earlier and the concerned players should end up proving to be worth it.
Example:
We scout player X and determine he is target nr 1 for the summer
We value him a £30m given market circumstances
We end up signing the player but need 2 months of negotiating to get it done because we have made various offers of £20m, £25m £30m etc and all of them have been rejected and in the end up paying £40m for the player. We have done a very bad deal. We have overpaid £10m and wasted 2 months getting it done.
We should have informed about player X and learned that they were searching for more than £30m, if they reject that we should have focussed on another target.
Problem is United seem to not know exactly what they want, not sure they fully know what is really out there and who is realistic and who is not, not sure we can properly value our targets and stick with that valuation and we seem to be bad quite bad a negotiating because we never end up with what we wanted or either we end up paying too much or we get it far too late.
Mate I own a really good website, www.PeopleTalkingLikeExpertsOnThingsTheyKnowNothingAbout.com I think you'd fit right in. Want to do an essay on Brain Surgery next?
Mate I own a really good website, www.PeopleTalkingLikeExpertsOnThingsTheyKnowNothingAbout.com I think you'd fit right in. Want to do an essay on Brain Surgery next?
Lying just for effect? Tut tut!Mate I own a really good website, www.PeopleTalkingLikeExpertsOnThingsTheyKnowNothingAbout.com I think you'd fit right in. Want to do an essay on Brain Surgery next?
Lying just for effect? Tut tut!
Poor behaviour. You'd do well to read and apply the "Rules to Remember" above the Reply box.It's just the Registration fees I need to pay now. Don't worry your article "How to Pull Girls" will be up later today.
No no
1 We should identify our targets in time and make a prioritzed list with alternatives on it
2 We should determine our budget and see how much we can/want to spend on each target given that budget and our own valuation of what that they player is worth in the current market
3 We should inquire how much the other club is looking for to let the player go
4 If that amount is lower than what we can/want to spend for that player we should just offer them what they are looking for (or close to it)
5 If that amount is more than what we can/want to spend on the player we should make them a take it or leave it offer that is the max amount we can/want to spend on the player
6 If the club rejects that take it or leave it offer than you move to the next target on your list
If you follow those 6 simple rules you should end up signing the players you need for decent price given the assumption that:
-You can prioritze the right targets (quality you need and realistcally available)
-You can properly value a player and determine how much you can and should spend on them
-You can negotiate well to find out the real amount a club is looking for to let a player go (they won't always tell you right away)
-You started preparations early and in time (done your homework)
-You know how to propspect the market to have a good idea what is out there
-You know what you need as a club
If other clubs manage to get good players on time and for good prices and you consistently end up either overpaying for players, end up with the wrong players or can't get your players on time because negotiations always seem to drag on for far too long you are doing one of those things wrong.
And if you compare us with other clubs:
-We pay a very high price for the quality we get
-We are amongst the slower clubs to wrap up deals
-We seem to end up alot of the time with the wrong players
In theory there is nothing wrong with us paying a high price for a player as long as we can afford it and believe the player is worth it. But if we are willing to pay that price we should on one hand be able to get deals way faster and way earlier and the concerned players should end up proving to be worth it.
Example:
We scout player X and determine he is target nr 1 for the summer
We value him a £30m given market circumstances
We end up signing the player but need 2 months of negotiating to get it done because we have made various offers of £20m, £25m £30m etc and all of them have been rejected and in the end up paying £40m for the player. We have done a very bad deal. We have overpaid £10m and wasted 2 months getting it done.
We should have informed about player X and learned that they were searching for more than £30m, if they reject that we should have focussed on another target.
Problem is United seem to not know exactly what they want, not sure they fully know what is really out there and who is realistic and who is not, not sure we can properly value our targets and stick with that valuation and we seem to be bad quite bad a negotiating because we never end up with what we wanted or either we end up paying too much or we get it far too late.
What's really funny is he thinks it is all so easy and he knows how it all works. Like LvG and company have no idea how to make a transfer, amazing we sign anyone. Though if he was in charge we probably would end up with out 10th choice or worse if any player or agent would even talk to him.
Looks like our targets are / were:
Right back: first choice Alves, second choice Clyne
CM: first Schweinsteiger, second Schneiderlein
CB: first choice was Ottamendi until Ramos became a possibility and now it is Ramos first and Ottamendi second
GK: not sure, probably Lloris first, don't know after that
Striker - no idea
Hush you Memphis does not count anymore.
http://www.thesportreview.com/tsr/2...s-louis-van-gaal-wants-deals-concluded-early/
In this article LvG does say it is important to get done quickly but the quote ends with him only saying he HOPES we can get done quickly.
No ultimatum. No promise. Just a hope.
Looks like our targets are / were:
Right back: first choice Alves, second choice Clyne
CM: first Schweinsteiger, second Schneiderlein
CB: first choice was Ottamendi until Ramos became a possibility and now it is Ramos first and Ottamendi second
GK: not sure, probably Lloris first, don't know after that
Striker - no idea