Thoraximus
Latin for deep throat
more like the crouton I feel
Had a bit of a mare today. His passing is usually near faultless but he's had more than a couple of strays. I'd have him in an absolute heartbeat though, he's utter class.
A mare? His passing has been excellent. This thread is embarrassing.
Fwiw I'd pay £35m now for the next Carrick.
I'd pay £70m for the next Scholes.
Report on Fox Sports just said that LvG wants Kroos and Reus at Man Utd which makes no sense since VG hasn't been hired yet.
It's always the danger with converted attacking players - their defensive instinct is piss poor in those kinds of situations.Great passer that lad but he has no pace. For the 3rd goal I cant help but feel that he was lazy in tracking back, either that or he cant really run.
Fwiw I'd pay £35m now for the next Carrick.
I'd pay £70m for the next Scholes.
I think Kroos is a real possibility now.
I think the figures bandied about are more reflective of Moyes United
Fergie's United generally didn't and Van Gaal's United (if it transpires that way) will probably not go down the road of Moyes in attempting to overpay on players - throwing cash at problems
Strootman and Erickson cost around the 10 million mark for their clubs - is there a huge difference in quality between Strootman, Erickson and Kroos?
Be my guest, buy Kroos.
He once again did nothing to put a stamp on the game. He never does when the offense around him isn't doing well already (and they don't need him to click at all). His expression, his body language, his attitude... it all screams to me that all he cares about by now are his amazing 90+% passing stats. Seriously, for 40 million I'd carry the guy to Manchester myself.
(To clarify: He's not the only one at fault here, other players were shite as well. The one to really blame is Pep. He decided to play Kroos instead of Martinez, for instance...)
I taught he was utilized poorly by Pep today. Wasn't he playing as a regista today? Isn't he a better box to box creative midfielder?
He's just a completely different type of player from Gundogan and Pogba though. Deep lying playmaker rather than box to box. Would need a strong defensive partner in the big games but as far as creative midfielders playing from deep there aren't many better.He's not at the level of players like Gundogan and Pogba as he doesn't rip teams open or score goals like the very best do...He's a bit like Carrick on Steroids in that he is very neat without dominating midfields on his own......He would still be a monster upgrade on Cleverly and we haven't a hope of signing the likes of the Pogbas and the Yaya Toures so I'd take him in a heartbeat
For anything more than 25m most Bayern fans would carry him to Manchester. It's ugly on the Bayern forums regarding him.
Anybody doubting Kroos should watch how he performed for Bayern last season till his injury. When he is played as the playmaking midfielder, he is very very good. I say buy this guy.
so he's the German Tom Huddlestone?
I have a short penis!
Who is Tom Huddlestone?
Edit: sorry to hear that (white text)
He will hardly be used like that if we get him. Toni Kroos will be used for his distribution and keeping the ball, something which he likes. A similar kind of role which Scholes had in his later years. He will be played in the middle of the park, not as a no.10. We have Mata, Kagawa, Rooney for that.My answer would be: Watch the first game against Juve and see how the game changed when Kroos had to go out injured and Müller played the 10 with Schweinsteiger and Martinez behind him. Then watch what they did against Barca without Kroos. We've never played better attacking, decisive football.
We have a winner
For anything more than 25m most Bayern fans would carry him to Manchester. It's ugly on the Bayern forums regarding him.
a sitting midfielder....someone who sticks to his position reeks of Moyes tactics
I'm sure Fletcher was interviewed and stated that Moyes wanted his central midfielders to sit
Kroos would still be a good signing at the right price but not alongside a defensive player - alongside a playmaker
Alongside Fibreglass
He's too slow and not good enough defensively to be considered a "creative box to box midfielder". He's very good at distributing the balls and ocassionaly tries for goal with a decent shot. His creative potential, however, is massively overrated in my eyes. He's actually very predictable in 9/10 games.
The 8 is his position: Not dynamic and willing to do something unpredictable and risky enough for 10, not strong, fast or generally good enough on defense to play the lone 6.