charleysurf
Obnoxious, abusive bellend who is best ignored
- Joined
- May 12, 2006
- Messages
- 16,298
Moyes wanted Kroos, therefore Kroos must be shit
LOL MUPPETS
KERMIT PIC
MUPPETS HAHAHAHAHA
KERMIT
MUPPETS
KERMIT
MUPPETS KERMIT, MUPPETS
But we can't afford it? If we pay players like Kroos as much as Schweinsteiger, our overall wage bill explodes and we simply can't let that happen. The fact that one of the few even richer clubs offer him significantly more than we're paying our best players doesn't make it a 'fair' price. It just means that one of richest clubs in the world uses their financial power to sign a player. There's nothing wrong with it, but don't make it sound like we're not offering 'fair' prices to our players, that's just very very wrong.Because Bayern have the unique situation that none of their players so far really went for the market value. Müller is being paid about 120k per week, when he could've easily made 180k+ in the open market. You can't expect every player to take a loyality discount. Also it's not like Bayern can't afford it, they simply don't want to afford it. Schweinsteiger is on 10m€, which I think would Kroos sign in a heart beat. If they don't want him to be one of their key players, I think it's a fair decision to leave for a club where he is valued, in both ways.
Why would there be quotes? And who would be quoted?So honigstein said he is likely to leave now.
Like I said that article has no quotes or anything.
Never liked him anyway, Fabregas, now, he's the real deal.
One things for sure, we as a club absolutely suck when it comes to transfers.
Mike Keegan strikes me as someone who doesn't have a clue.
As soon as a story is going down one route he jumps on it and if it you turns he will immediately jump back.
That's right Mike, I only like you when it sounds good to my mupet ears.
he well and truly broke the caf.
Let's just say it was a choice between Kroos and Fabregas since Kroos and Fabregas together would probably be too attacking in a two-man midfield. Who would you want? I'd have Fabregas personally.
Not all transfer stories are deliberately planted by the club's communication department. Sometimes it's just some random employee saying something he shouldn't be saying.There'll be others. I still think it's odd this was leaked seemingly all at once, unless everyone else is just using Jackson as a source. I don't get what any club gains by denying anything as surely if you're not after Kroos, having clubs who own players you are after think that you are, is useful
Fabregas hasn't played in a deeper position since God knows when, so if there was a choice between the two I'd have gone for Kroos.Let's just say it was a choice between Kroos and Fabregas since Kroos and Fabregas together would probably be too attacking in a two-man midfield. Who would you want? I'd have Fabregas personally.
That would be much worse.All we need now is for LVG to decide he doesn't want Shaw and Woodward's last couple of months will have been entirely wasted. Plus ca change...
The last time he did, though, he was top-5 in the world in that position. As good as Kroos is, you can't say that about him. Fabregas is undoubtedly the better footballer for me. The question is can he regain his old form?Fabregas hasn't played in a deeper position since God knows when, so if there was a choice between the two I'd have gone for Kroos.
[MUPPET]Perhaps the fact he is available for nothing next summer is the reasoning?[/MUPPET]