Against fodder? In the Charity shield? Unfortunately you need to do more than that here.
Tom Cleverley | 2012-14 Performances
- Thread starter Bebe
- Start date
- Status
Against fodder? In the Charity shield? Unfortunately you need to do more than that here.
hmmm. was thinking last season actually.
Fodder then
This post could have been made at any time since 2009.
hardly.
poor Cleverley.
It's his turn to get the abuse this week!
Giggsy, Anderson and Fellaini's in recent weeks,
Thank goodness people like Carrick these days .
It's his turn to get the abuse this week!
Giggsy, Anderson and Fellaini's in recent weeks,
Thank goodness people like Carrick these days .
Carricks has lost his legs.
I remember when carrick was widely hated. The forum I used to be on, a lot of people were calling him crab and so forth.
He wasn't terrible at all. This place is fecking mental sometimes. 
He wasn't terrible at all. This place is fecking mental sometimes.
What was he then?
Uninspiring? Lackadaisical? It doesn't matter what fecking adjective is used he had a stinker.....and he's been poor for a while now. Whatever word describes his performance it doesn't matter......anyone who understands football understands what he served up yesterday was garbage.
Not terrible, that's for sure.
If he can somehow out of the blue become a playmaker then he would be some player
I said this earlier in this thread but it bears repeating in my opinion - I dont think Cleverley suits the system/formations we play, and im not convinced he ever will without drastically changing his game. I think the reasons he has appeared to deteriorate and looks average at times is due to this.
To expand - we usually play some variation of 4-4-1-1, 4-2-3-1 or 4-4-2, depending which way you look at it. In any of these systems, you have 2 deeper lying, holding CMs, which is the role in our team Cleverley would be expected to play, as he does not have the expertise to play as the #10 or out wide against top opposition.
Cleverleys game is all about keeping play ticking over, simple short passes but with a lot of movement. He excels when he has space to attack (hohoho) rather than being restricted to a holding role where in front of him he will have the likes of Rooney and Kagawa already competing for space.
Essentially, we play this;
-----CM --- CM -----
---------AM---------
I think that Cleverley would flourish in a 4-3-3 formation however, where the midfield would line up like this;
---------DM--------
----CM-------CM---
Playing as a CM with a more dedicated defensive midfielder behind him, but with a fellow midfielder alongside him to exchange passes with and to have the luxury of pushing forward without being a dedicated AM/#10, and without having those players in front of him to take up the space.
This is why I think he would perform better in the national team if he played alongside Wilshere (for example) with someone like Carrick behind in a defensive role.
I hope I am wrong, but Cleverley doesnt (yet) have enough in his locker to be a "proper" #10, and nor is he defensively sound enough to perform the Carrick role in a holding midfield pair, and he is wasted out wide.
To expand - we usually play some variation of 4-4-1-1, 4-2-3-1 or 4-4-2, depending which way you look at it. In any of these systems, you have 2 deeper lying, holding CMs, which is the role in our team Cleverley would be expected to play, as he does not have the expertise to play as the #10 or out wide against top opposition.
Cleverleys game is all about keeping play ticking over, simple short passes but with a lot of movement. He excels when he has space to attack (hohoho) rather than being restricted to a holding role where in front of him he will have the likes of Rooney and Kagawa already competing for space.
Essentially, we play this;
-----CM --- CM -----
---------AM---------
I think that Cleverley would flourish in a 4-3-3 formation however, where the midfield would line up like this;
---------DM--------
----CM-------CM---
Playing as a CM with a more dedicated defensive midfielder behind him, but with a fellow midfielder alongside him to exchange passes with and to have the luxury of pushing forward without being a dedicated AM/#10, and without having those players in front of him to take up the space.
This is why I think he would perform better in the national team if he played alongside Wilshere (for example) with someone like Carrick behind in a defensive role.
I hope I am wrong, but Cleverley doesnt (yet) have enough in his locker to be a "proper" #10, and nor is he defensively sound enough to perform the Carrick role in a holding midfield pair, and he is wasted out wide.
ghaliboys response to a post that disagrees with him
Are you sure you two even know what you're shitting on about? Should we just forget the 11 years of development at the club and on loan as an attacking midfielder who player predominantly forward and in attacking positions on the left and right because he's played 7 months as a deeper midfielder part of a two man midfield? Not really in his natural position?
That's the only way we can get him in to the team at the moment because there isn't another genuine central midfielder apart from Fellaini who is still bedding in and Anderson who is far to tactically ill-disciplined to play in a midfield two with Carrick. We have two no10's fighting for that position in a 4-2-3-1 and no visible signs of wanting to switch to 4-3-3.
Again for the funny pages "He's an attacking midfielder with no creativity and not a great eye for goal. Not a very 'attacking' midfielder."
wtf man those smilies adequately sum up most of ghaliboy's posts.
Don't worry about reading it or anything, all good.ghaliboys response to a post that disagrees with him
He's not even had the chance to play that close to goal for United..
Was surprised by Cleverley's "Rafael against Everton" moment at the end where he gave up chasing the ball and De Gea had to rush out and save his bacon. That's not like him.
Nor has Chris Smalling, there is a reason for it.
He's a good player. That's all.
He can occasionally do a job and be a decent sideshow for Carrick, but he's not had a seriously good performance in a while. He had some great influence in games at the beginning of last season such as City, Newcastle and Chelsea away, Arsenal, Stoke and Sunderland at home but since the turn of the year he's been unbelievably inconsistent and a shadow of the player we thought he was when he burst his way into the United first team.
Now we all know he was a bit delicate when he first came about, so perhaps theres something in that affecting his game. But along with Welbeck, it's been a disappointing 24 months of non-existent development.
He can occasionally do a job and be a decent sideshow for Carrick, but he's not had a seriously good performance in a while. He had some great influence in games at the beginning of last season such as City, Newcastle and Chelsea away, Arsenal, Stoke and Sunderland at home but since the turn of the year he's been unbelievably inconsistent and a shadow of the player we thought he was when he burst his way into the United first team.
Now we all know he was a bit delicate when he first came about, so perhaps theres something in that affecting his game. But along with Welbeck, it's been a disappointing 24 months of non-existent development.
What a bizarre comparison. Smalling is in a similar predicament having to play on the right a lot of the time.
I'm glad I'm not the only one to notice this. He somehow manages to use more smilies than Boss used to.ghaliboys response to a post that disagrees with him
He needs confidence and a run of games, seems to be a bit like Rooney in that he has a mare every first game back from injury.
If he could become Paul Scholes then that'd be great too. Unfortunately neither will happen in my opinion. He never has been a creative player.
It was an extreme example but valid - Smalling isnt played at #10 because he lacks the skills and proficiency for it, especially compared to the likes of Rooney and Kagawa who are and should be our first and second choices for that position by an absolute mile. Substitue "Smalling" for "Cleverley" and the exact same can be said. When Kagawa is already struggling to get games there, there can be no justification for Cleverley being played in that role behind the striker.
Frankly I dont think Cleverley has the subtelty or finesse in his play to perform the #10 role for a top team. He is a good player, I like him, but at the moment I dont see any position in our formation where I can really san "YES! That is the position in which Tom will excel!" He is too defensive to play #10, but isnt defensive enough to play a holding role like Carrick. The only way I currently see a place for him is in a 4-3-3 setup where he is one of two more advanced CMs in a midfield trio, with a dedicated DM behind him/them.
He would do well for any team that played 3 in midfield, bar the most elite teams in Europe. Given his only competition is Anderson, Giggs, an underperforming Fellaini, and a non existent Fletcher, it seems we're asking too much from him. He's very good at facilitating play, keeping possession, providing options for our attackers. He won't grab a game by the scruff of the neck, but his fundamentals are solid. I'm encouraged by what I see from him, and hopefully another midfield signing will aid his development.
This is probably the worst way to try and make a point I have ever seen. Smalling doesn't play as a number 10 because he has been a defender since probably puberty and his first growth spurt that speculatively would have taken him near to and over 6ft. Probably around 10 years of his life and his whole career up until this time.
Cleverley has grown up as an attacking midfielder and regularly played there for the youth team and at reserve level before his breakthrough loan at Watford when he scored for fun in the Championship and then impressed playing from the left at Wigan and for United in the following pre season as a number 10. After that he even impressed in a deeper midfield role with Anderson of all players. The player with the least compatibility to the squad.
Yet another person ignoring everything from prior to 7 months ago. It must be a new Caf mystery to ignore everything from a few years ago and insist that players will cease development when they say so.
Never in the last 7 months?
He's just never been a creative player in my eyes. I remember watching him playing for Wigan and seeing a lot of people say he'd become the next Paul Scholes - I just never saw it in him and I still don't now.
It's a lot more likely that we'll bring in a player to take up that mantle in the future and Cleverley will take up a lesser role.
What about his loan for Watford?
Cleverley at this moment in time clearly does not have the sort of guile, vision, dribbling ability or productivity to play as an attacking midfielder/in the hole player for us. Not that a player needs all of those attributes, but we're better off looking towards Powell for that job.
There is definitely a place for him in this team when he's on form - either as part of a two like last year or, preferably, as a 3 with another more attack minded player - but I wouldn't say Cleverley has ever been creative or technically gifted enough to be the focal point of our attacking play through the centre. There is a lot of difference between being a productive and good all round player like he was for Watford in the Championship and being a playmaker for one of the world's top teams. Even at the start of 11/12 when he was playing at what has been his best level so far, the benefit was more in the pass and move game he drove in midfield rather than any creative threat he provided. That's what everyone was hoping he would involve into - a well rounded player who could constantly provide an outlet and quicken the tempo of play in deeper central areas.
He does look to have regressed unfortunately, which is worrying. I thought he'd be a lot better by now.
There is definitely a place for him in this team when he's on form - either as part of a two like last year or, preferably, as a 3 with another more attack minded player - but I wouldn't say Cleverley has ever been creative or technically gifted enough to be the focal point of our attacking play through the centre. There is a lot of difference between being a productive and good all round player like he was for Watford in the Championship and being a playmaker for one of the world's top teams. Even at the start of 11/12 when he was playing at what has been his best level so far, the benefit was more in the pass and move game he drove in midfield rather than any creative threat he provided. That's what everyone was hoping he would involve into - a well rounded player who could constantly provide an outlet and quicken the tempo of play in deeper central areas.
He does look to have regressed unfortunately, which is worrying. I thought he'd be a lot better by now.
I really don't know how people can say he doesn't have the ability to play in more attacking positions to be honest, it's stupid and what a lot of people are basing their whole opinion on him with as well. Then continuing the selectively write off things he's shown he can do to claim that he can't do them at all.
He was doing it at United with Anderson. Which pretty much paints the entire picture of why he doesn't look as effective along side a player like Carrick.
Cleverley wasn't a playmaker for us in that team. He was a central midfielder who could contribute well in an attacking sense.
In that form, I'd say he could be good in that role, but not really what we should be aiming for. Regardless, he is some way off that player at the moment and hasn't quite hit those heights since.
*Your Anderson point backs up Walrus' suggestion that he's more suited to being used in a midfield 3 with someone more attacking.
He was part of a two man mobile deeper midfield. Both attacked and both defended. It was a fluid system that relied on the ball carrying ability of Anderson to complement the pass and move style of Cleverley. It complemented good and sharp movement from TC with his main strength from a partner who was not afraid to always move the ball forward if there wasn't a pass on.
Like I have been saying it completely goes against the way Carrick plays. Right now TC is just getting stuck having the herd and funnel play and come deeper due to the lack of mobility and closing from Carrick and by that stage he's playing closer to his own goal than he is to the opposition's goal. When he breaks from transition he gets either one pass forward in which he has to support or a pass to Carrick in which he moves and gets no return pass. He'd be more suited to a midfield three but he'd also be more suited with a mobile partner who is willing to carry the ball and utilize it in midfield in a more dynamic way. I find it bizarre that Carrick played more balls to Rooney and Kagawa in that game than he did to Tom Cleverley his actual midfield parter. That also tells a massive story in both the way Carrick plays and the way it just doesn't work with Cleverley's style.
But I am getting dangerously close to blurting out the fact that it's probably Carrick's lack of mobility that is hindering the team more than the 'form' or 'perceived can and cannot do' roles that fans think Cleverley can do. I'm not trying to tell everyone he could play as a number 10 right now and do it well. I'm saying he hasn't had the chance to do it in a critical role with United yet. But has shown in the past that he's more than capable of being threatening with a more mobile midfielder and/or in front of goal. Regardless of where he played or who he played against which is bizarrely being written off as if it never happened. As if he grew up as some sort of other player and never played attacking roles in midfield before. Which is yet again bizarre. He's naturally a more attacking midfield player but people are strangely trying to say that he doesn't have the ability which quite frankly is complete tosh.
I think we are looking for too many things regarding what Cleverley does and could do.
I think it's simple. He is a very good player who can perform a few roles in midfield, he isn't world class and never will be but that doesn't mean he won't and can't have a big future at United. In my opinion, it suits us to the ground, having an England international who cost us nothing, wants to play for the club and can either play a regular role or fill in when needed.
We don't and will never pin our hopes on Cleverley being our number one midfielder, that's what you go and spend big money on, Bryan Robson, Roy Keane and Michael Carrick for example, all big money signings that went on to become main figures in the midfield. We can go and should buy the things we need that Cleverley doesn't provide.
So I feel we over-complicate it, he is the ideal squad player in my opinion. I have no worries in playing him in any game and don't mind having players of higher quality (in the future) keeping him out.
I think it's simple. He is a very good player who can perform a few roles in midfield, he isn't world class and never will be but that doesn't mean he won't and can't have a big future at United. In my opinion, it suits us to the ground, having an England international who cost us nothing, wants to play for the club and can either play a regular role or fill in when needed.
We don't and will never pin our hopes on Cleverley being our number one midfielder, that's what you go and spend big money on, Bryan Robson, Roy Keane and Michael Carrick for example, all big money signings that went on to become main figures in the midfield. We can go and should buy the things we need that Cleverley doesn't provide.
So I feel we over-complicate it, he is the ideal squad player in my opinion. I have no worries in playing him in any game and don't mind having players of higher quality (in the future) keeping him out.
Spot the odd one out. We never play with a single midfielder anyway - always part of a two or a three. You can't just play any old combination and hope it works.
You seem to have written an entire two paragraphs trying to argue that my points are not valid but without actually saying anything or making any points of your own. There isn't really anything for me to respond to so I will reiterate what I said before;
Cleverley may have played in the past as a #10 but that is largely irrelevant. Kagawa and Bale started their careers as DM and FB respectively in their youth days, Scholes started as a striker before gradually dropping further and further back as time went on. Because Cleverley had some success in that position at youth and reserve level, or on loan to lesser clubs, doesn't mean he should be guaranteed game time in that role ahead of the likes of Rooney and Kagawa in the first team.
If we assume he isn't getting in as a #10 then where would you play him? He isn't a winger and again, we are already overstocked out wide anyway, at the moment he seems to be trying to reinvent himself as a deep lying playmaker like Carrick, but he is not positionally sound and, like you said, his history is as an attacking midfielder, thus his skillset is more suited to that.
So we are back to my very original point which is that I simply don't see a space/role in the first team for him at the moment. Note that that isn't saying he is a bad player or doesn't have potential - Cleverley is a player I have always rated. He would be perfectly suited for a system like the old Barcelona 4-3-3, he could slot into one of those midfield roles perfectly. In a 4-2-3-1 however he isn't suited for a deep role, and he is nowhere near ready to be our #10 in my eyes, plus we have two excellent players for that position already.
That has absolutely nothing to do with the point being made.
Your posts on our midfield make me want to tear my hair out sometimes. Why are you so hellbent on trying to undermine Michael Carrick? This is a player who was perhaps our best and most consistent player last year; a player who is typical of what a modern day holding midfielder should offer, and someone who, on last season's form, would've walked into 99% of teams on the planet without the need for a change in formation. It makes absolutely no sense to lay into him when he is exactly the sort of player that is holding successful modern day midfields together. This fluid system you keep referring to - one that does not require Carrick or one that plays him in a different role - is actually unorthodox these days and requires either top drawer midfielders or an extremely gelled unit. We have neither, so the best hope is to play a more conventional formation with a quality deep lying midfielder (Carrick), whilst structuring the rest of the midfield around that core. We are pretty much forced to do this (Cleverley and Anderson are not good enough for us to try anything else), and the formation would work if Cleverley/Rooney were more creative, direct and better at pressing.
Anyway, this wasn't the point. The original discussion was about Cleverley as a number 10, which is a position he is not well suited for given the last 3 years of his career. It's not relevant who he has played next to or who he should be played with and in what way - that position requires a level of technical ability, dribbling and creativity beyond what he's shown for Manchester United. It also requires a different mindset, which is why what he did with Anderson as a central midfielder (when literally the entire team was amazing) isn't the strongest argument in favour of him excelling as a more advanced player. Think back to when people were saying Evra could play left wing when he was destroying the entire opposition's right side single-handedly; he did eventually play left wing a few times, and he was very underwhelming. That from a player who actually did have the attributes to play the role.
Cleverley on top form could definitely play there (he looked pretty good for England there once, and not so good a couple of other times), but it's going to be limited stuff in comparison to what we could field. I mean, he is a worse player in every single way than Wayne Rooney, who himself has had a lot of problems in that role during the last 2 years.
For about three games or so. After that he never replicated that form.
This year he has been terrible, as shit as Young. Except in the game against Chelsea when IMO he was our best player, though in a much more defensive position than usual.
He's not been terrible this season. He was looking in good form before the injury actually.
- Status