Unmutual
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2016
- Messages
- 1,225
A midfield trio of Pogba, Bakayoko and Herrera would be right up Mourinho's street. Nimble diminutive midfielders have never been his thing.
A midfield trio of Pogba, Bakayoko and Herrera would be right up Mourinho's street. Nimble diminutive midfielders have never been his thing.
He's 6 foot I think just because he's thin he looks smaller.Herrera is nimble and quite small by way of defensive midfielders. He's below average height at 5'9 is he not?
Herrera is nimble and quite small by way of defensive midfielders. He's below average height at 5'9 is he not?
Herrera is nimble and quite small by way of defensive midfielders. He's below average height at 5'9 is he not?
He's 6 foot I think just because he's thin he looks smaller.
He is 6 feet but i think him playing alongside Pogba(6'3) and Carrick(6'2). Also he is friends with mata and you would think midgets are only friendly to other midgets.Herrera is nimble and quite small by way of defensive midfielders. He's below average height at 5'9 is he not?
He's 6 foot I think just because he's thin he looks smaller.
Surprisingly Herrera is actually 6 feet tall.
Think you've made the mistake I sometimes make with Google, thinking that 5.9 feet is the same as 5 foot 9.
He's taller than me and I'm 5. 11Herrera is nimble and quite small by way of defensive midfielders. He's below average height at 5'9 is he not?
Surprisingly Herrera is actually 6 feet tall.
It's probably because Zlatan at 6'5, Pogba at 6'3, Fellaini 6'3, Carrick 6'2, Smalling 6'5 etc all make him look smaller than he is. We've got quite a big team now. Even Mata/Lingard are only 5'8 which is average weight.Is he really? Doesn't look it. Fair enough in that case, 6ft is quite obviously tall enough.
I think so too, although even when I see him live I never recognised it.
People wanting Carrick clone to replace carrick forget carrick was never Roy keane. Like for like is never possible. Hell we replaced Ronaldo with Valencia and still won the league. We wont find another carrick, We will have to adjust the way we play. Thats what we did after keane.
Who's to say we won't sign 1 of those aswell? We are pretty much replacing Schneiderlin/Schweisteiger/Carrick within 2 years. Bakayoko is similar to Schneiderlin, but hopefully more confident going forward.You don't need a Carrick clone but you need one of the midfield 3 to be a player that can control the tempo of a match, a trio of Bakayoko/Pogba/Herrera will be all hot air and bluster but lacking a brain piece as well as defensive protection.
You can maybe win the PL with that type of midfield I think, I mean Leicester did, but if you look at the elite European sides they all have that CM in either the Carrick or Scholes mold that can dictate the tempo which is important for CL football.
Who's to say we won't sign 1 of those aswell? We are pretty much replacing Schneiderlin/Schweisteiger/Carrick within 2 years. Bakayoko is similar to Schneiderlin, but hopefully more confident going forward.
Barca don't. They have lacked midfield control for a while now. Bayern's midfield in their treble year didn't have one. Atletico have reached 2 CL finals without a deep laying midfielder as well.You don't need a Carrick clone but you need one of the midfield 3 to be a player that can control the tempo of a match, a trio of Bakayoko/Pogba/Herrera will be all hot air and bluster but lacking a brain piece as well as defensive protection.
You can maybe win the PL with that type of midfield I think, I mean Leicester did, but if you look at the elite European sides they all have that CM in either the Carrick or Scholes mold that can dictate the tempo which is important for CL football.
Barca don't. They have lacked midfield control for a while now. Bayern's midfield in their treble year didn't have one. Atletico have reached 2 CL finals without a deep laying midfielder as well.
Bastian was box to box ala Pogba. It was Martinez who sat back.Barca have Busquets and Iniesta, the Bayern team had Schweinsteiger, Atletico don't but their whole identity is built on defense.
Nobody else from the top teams plays with a Carrick. To think we need a like-for-like replacement is wrong. In my opinion we might be even better with an athletic destroyer that is no slouch on the ball.
Bastian was box to box ala Pogba. It was Martinez who sat back.
Iniesta is an attacker more than a midfielder and Busquets doesn't dictate the tempo of games. He hasn't the passing range of Carrick or Scholes to spread the ball or dictate any tempo with Messi etc alongside him. If anything that was Xavi and they've won a few league titles and a CL since he was phased out.
Again Barca haven't had midfield control v top sides for a few seasons now. They pass it forward to the front 3 as quickly as they can
So we don't need a holding midfielder type ala Carrick to dictate games if we have it elsewhere on the pitch?Bastian controlled games, you don't need to be the deepest CM to dictate the game, same with Iniesta at Barca or Silva at City, they can control the game from a more advanced role. Busquets isn't as good as Carrick passing-wise but he is very good, the change at Barca has to do with the fact they have a videogame forward line which has decreased Barca's use of posession.
Bastian was box to box ala Pogba. It was Martinez who sat back.
Iniesta is an attacker more than a midfielder and Busquets doesn't dictate the tempo of games. He hasn't the passing range of Carrick or Scholes to spread the ball or dictate any tempo with Messi etc alongside him. If anything that was Xavi and they've won a few league titles and a CL since he was phased out.
Again Barca haven't had midfield control v top sides for a few seasons now. They pass it forward to the front 3 as quickly as they can
100% agree here. It's more tactical change. Busquet can't really set neck breaking tempo, but he's more than enough to dictate slow to medium tempo. It's more a tactical change to get the best out of Neymar and Suarez (Messi is just fine with slow tempo). Neymar struggled in his first season due to the slow build up not suit his style. Under Luiz Enrique, Barcelona is more direct and using more long ball.Isn't the change at Barca more tactical? They've given up the focus on possession to take advantage of that brutal frontline. Busquets is a very, very intelligent passer and can control games. He might not have the range, but he sets the tempo and starts their moves by picking up the ball from the CBs.
Nah, I dont think so anyway. Their lack of control is down to losing Xavi and Iniesta aging. That's why they're so down on Rakitic form and brought in Gomes.Isn't the change at Barca more tactical? They've given up the focus on possession to take advantage of that brutal frontline. Busquets is a very, very intelligent passer and can control games. He might not have the range, but he sets the tempo and starts their moves by picking up the ball from the CBs.
Here's an updated one btw.
Nah, I dont think so anyway. Their lack of control is down to losing Xavi and Iniesta aging. That's why they're so down on Rakitic form and brought in Gomes.
Previously, the Catalans were pure possession hoarders, with inspirational midfielder Xavi often deliberately slowing down moves, and let the opposition get back into position before concentrating on breaking them down gradually.
Because Pep Guardiola prioritised central midfield dominance over everything else, Barcelona packed players into that zone, and their passing usually flowed into the centre quickly. Now, they look wide.
Even if you believe that it still shows you don't need a Carrick / Scholes spreading the play to be successsful.Cox with some pretty good analysis here, showing how Enrique has changed the team to get the most out of Messi and Neymar by focusing play down the flanks rather than hoarding the ball in the middle under Pep.
http://www.fourfourtwo.com/us/featu...volved-yet-still-manage-dominate-europes-best
So we don't need a holding midfielder type ala Carrick to dictate games if we have it elsewhere on the pitch?
Again Ill point to Pogba
I think people who are hoping for a player similar to Carrick are gonna be very dissapointed. Because I believe Mourinho favours the combative/physical type of player who has good mobility.
Even if you believe that it still shows you don't need a Carrick / Scholes spreading the play to be successsful.
I think people who are hoping for a player similar to Carrick are gonna be very dissapointed. Because I believe Mourinho favours the combative/physical type of player who has good mobility.
I don't think that's the case. Pogba did just well, IMO was still improving without any disruption after Pirlo left, leaving him with more brute force midfield partners. It's more about how he's not too burdened with defensive duty like under Deschamps' France or teammates can't control the football upfront and lead to being constantly pushed back. If the game flows, IMO even playing as part of midfield 2 is fine for him. He's similar to Vieira in this manner.That's not what Pogba is IMO, he's best when playing off the cuff and on instinct in the final 3rd, rather than with patience and a metronomic style.
Mourino has used proper playmakers like Alonso, Modric and Fabregas as well, if he tries for a pure cruncher he'll be the one ultimately disappointed when the output of Pogba declines.
Don't know why you think Mourinho would go for a pure cruncher, This isn't the EPL from the 90s.That's not what Pogba is IMO, he's best when playing off the cuff and on instinct in the final 3rd, rather than with patience and a metronomic style.
Mourino has used proper playmakers like Alonso, Modric and Fabregas as well, if he tries for a pure cruncher he'll be the one ultimately disappointed when the output of Pogba declines.
I don't think that's the case. Pogba did just well, IMO was still improving without any disruption after Pirlo left leaving him with more brute force midfield partners. It's more about how he's not too burdened with defensive duty like under Deschamps or teammates can't control the football upfront and lead to being constantly pushed back. If the game flows, IMO even playing as part of midfield 2 is fine for him. He's similar to Vieira in this manner.
I meant Vieira can get frustration in the scenario that his team can't flow and they being constantly pushed back. Pogba is similar in that sense. I said that due to people judge Pogba's ability in 2 man midfield without taking into context that he played that under Deschamps' restriction, and during a time when our attackers at United are all over the place who constantly give the ball away cheaply. Then Fellaini as midfield part doesn't help. Give him a competent partner who is more defensive oriented then we can revisit the 2 man midfield, which I am positive for better outcome this time.He isn't similar to Vieira. Vieira was able to control the game, Vieira was the ultimate midfielder able to do everything at a very high level also Marchisio is able to control the flow in midfield, he has a great vision and a large passing range.
I meant Vieira can get frustration in the scenario that his team can't flow and they being constantly pushed back. Pogba is similar in that sense. I said that due to people judge Pogba's ability in 2 man midfield without taking into context that he played that under Deschamps' restriction, and during a time when our attackers at United are all over the place who constantly give the ball away cheaply. Then Fellaini as midfield part doesn't help.