Thomas Müller

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not going to happen at all, lol.

Schweinsteiger is a totally different case. He's 30+, not fit most of times, not surely a regular starter and on top of that Guardiola didn't seem to like/rate him. Müller's case is different, before we sell him, we'll sack Guardiola.

In terms of quality Schweinsteiger wasn't a big loss as he didn't perform too well in the last 2 seasons due to his fitness, aging and maybe Guardiola. The Schweinsteigerr signing for United was a bit like the signing of Alonso for Bayern last year.

But even if we didn't sell any players this year there would be no chance to get Müller at all.
 
Not going to happen at all, lol.

Schweinsteiger is a totally different case. He's 30+, not fit most of times, not surely a regular starter and on top of that Guardiola didn't seem to like/rate him. Müller's case is different, before we sell him, we'll sack Guardiola.

In terms of quality Schweinsteiger wasn't a big loss as he didn't perform too well in the last 2 seasons due to his fitness, aging and maybe Guardiola. The Schweinsteigerr signing for United was a bit like the signing of Alonso for Bayern last year.

But even if we didn't sell any players this year there would be no chance to get Müller at all.

Not a regular starter/Pep didnt like him - Why did he play all the big Bayern games?
 
Interesting is that Bild Bayern had a new article about it tonight. They do not source it on sport1.




If they phrase an article like this they are actually pretty relieable.

Müller was asked about it but just laughed it away and Wiggerl, his agent, stated that he is player of FC Bayern with a contract. So nothing to get out of that.
 
If we did get Muller, would that mean Rooney would play at the top of the midfield triangle, in 4-3-3, behind Muller up front?
 
It is a lot of money. Bayern don't need it, though. They will not sell Muller, unless he wants to be sold. I can't imagine why he would.
 
I don't doubt the veracity of that story, I can certainly imagine Woody throwing a huge bid in like that.

A transfer won't happen, though.
 
Muller is not happening and the folks at Bayern are trying to save face here. They've been facing huge criticism lately for letting Schweinsteiger go especially after Kroos also left, at the press conference when the deal was announced they had to assure fans Muller would not be going the same direction. So leak a story about how we turned down 100 MILLION EUROS for Muller and get some fans back onside. If we really offered 100m they'd be mad to not just snap accept the offer then go out and buy themselves Reus/Griezmann.
 
It is a lot of money. Bayern don't need it, though. They will not sell Muller, unless he wants to be sold. I can't imagine why he would.
This, it just isn't going to happen. No way they lose Muller and Schweinsteiger in the same window.
 
Muller is not happening and the folks at Bayern are trying to save face here. They've been facing huge criticism lately for letting Schweinsteiger go especially after Kroos also left, at the press conference when the deal was announced they had to assure fans Muller would not be going the same direction. So leak a story about how we turned down 100 MILLION EUROS for Muller and get some fans back onside. If we really offered 100m they'd be mad to not just snap accept the offer then go out and buy themselves Reus/Griezmann.

They can buy both without needing to sell muller.
 
Muller is not happening and the folks at Bayern are trying to save face here. They've been facing huge criticism lately for letting Schweinsteiger go especially after Kroos also left, at the press conference when the deal was announced they had to assure fans Muller would not be going the same direction. So leak a story about how we turned down 100 MILLION EUROS for Muller and get some fans back onside. If we really offered 100m they'd be mad to not just snap accept the offer then go out and buy themselves Reus/Griezmann.

Can't see why Bayern would need to do that. I would be far more content if there's no rumour at all. Not that I believe the board is willing to sell nor that Müller is unhappy at Bayern.
 
Not a regular starter/Pep didnt like him - Why did he play all the big Bayern games?

Well, first of all, he didn't. Second of all: he played basically all games he was fit because we had an absurd amount of injuries and basically no choice at all. Who was fit, started. That's why Alonso still played in the Second half of the season
 
They can buy both without needing to sell muller.

No they can't because at least one would be taking Muller's place.

Can't see why Bayern would need to do that. I would be far more content if there's no rumour at all. Not that I believe the board is willing to sell nor that Müller is unhappy at Bayern.

Bayern board act the same as plenty of other boards, regularly acting out of self interest and leaking stories which suit them. Every player has a price and Muller isn't worth 100m or even close to it.
 
They can buy both without needing to sell muller.

They can buy both without needing to sell muller.

That, and neither is on the same level as him. It's like saying "If United had been offered 70M euros back then for Scholes, they should've taken the offer and bought Gerrard or Mendieta for that money." Makes no sense.
 
No they can't because at least one would be taking Muller's place.



Bayern board act the same as plenty of other boards, regularly acting out of self interest and leaking stories which suit them. Every player has a price and Muller isn't worth 100m or even close to it.

There's a space for a winger there even with Muller staying. Rubery and Robben aren't getting any younger. If they have to make space, Gotze is the one they'd sell.
 
I have been reading through some comments on various German sites which have been reporting this story.

Bayern fans seem to be very angry about the idea of Müller being sold. Few are argueing that he is never ever worth 100 Mio EUR and Bayern should take the money before we come to our senses again.
Most of them are however quite pissed. Some are even saying they will quit watching Bayern games as Bayern will finally lose the identity.
 
we should go get muller whenever we can. just can't see how rummenigge can swallow his own words
 
What i dont u understand is why man utd didnt splash 100m on bale. Most of us most likely asumed we didnt pay that much for a single player.

But now suddenly we do it on muller. Great player, but hes not going to carry a team. And if you cant do that for 100m then its a bad transfer.

So in short, man utd were just ignorant 2 seasons ago and had to smack on their face and finish 7th to realise they need to spend this much to get the best.
 
No they can't because at least one would be taking Muller's place.



Bayern board act the same as plenty of other boards, regularly acting out of self interest and leaking stories which suit them. Every player has a price and Muller isn't worth 100m or even close to it.

It's more of a question whether or not they can build a stronger squad for that money compared to keeping him.

If they can't, why sell him for that money? Who or whom would they buy that are available, as good as him and as unlikely to be injured for €100M?

From a political view I don't think Bayern will sell 2 players to the same club in one transfer Windows either.
 
What i dont u understand is why man utd didnt splash 100m on bale. Most of us most likely asumed we didnt pay that much for a single player.

But now suddenly we do it on muller. Great player, but hes not going to carry a team. And if you cant do that for 100m then its a bad transfer.

So in short, man utd were just ignorant 2 seasons ago and had to smack on their face and finish 7th to realise they need to spend this much to get the best.

If it was woodwards decision why might have. Moyes didnt stand a chance.
 
There's a space for a winger there even with Muller staying. Rubery and Robben aren't getting any younger. If they have to make space, Gotze is the one they'd sell.

They aren't keeping Muller and then signing Reus/Griezmann to go along with already having Ribery/Robben/Costa/Gotze That would leave them with 7 players for 3 positions. And more importantly those players wouldn't sign with Bayern with such low expectation of getting game time.

It's more of a question whether or not they can build a stronger squad for that money compared to keeping him.

If they can't, why sell him for that money? Who or whom would they buy that are available, as good as him and as unlikely to be injured for €100M?

From a political view I don't think Bayern will sell 2 players to the same club in one transfer Windows either.

They could sign Reus/Griezmann for 100m and that would easily make them stronger.
 
What i dont u understand is why man utd didnt splash 100m on bale. Most of us most likely asumed we didnt pay that much for a single player.

But now suddenly we do it on muller. Great player, but hes not going to carry a team. And if you cant do that for 100m then its a bad transfer.

So in short, man utd were just ignorant 2 seasons ago and had to smack on their face and finish 7th to realise they need to spend this much to get the best.
According to different articles
we made a bid for Bale that was bigger than the bid Madrid made. David Moyes more or less confirmed we wanted him too.
 
Not a regular starter/Pep didnt like him - Why did he play all the big Bayern games?

I said "not surely a regular starter". I am not sure if he would have started every game if all were fit. That was what i was saying.
 
What i dont u understand is why man utd didnt splash 100m on bale. Most of us most likely asumed we didnt pay that much for a single player.

But now suddenly we do it on muller. Great player, but hes not going to carry a team. And if you cant do that for 100m then its a bad transfer.

So in short, man utd were just ignorant 2 seasons ago and had to smack on their face and finish 7th to realise they need to spend this much to get the best.

If you're referring to before Bale went to Real - we did put an offer to Spurs for over £100m, but Bale only wanted to go to Real. We also wanted Ronnie for similar money also. Both of those stories are widely accepted as being true..
 
Guardiola might be against this sale. Not because he rates Müller that much and would not take 100 Mio from us to buy 1 or 2 other players.
However, I think if he does not deliver this season everybody will blame him and the sale of Schweini and Müller.
Pep is not afraid to do it his way but that kind of pressure might be too much even for him.
 
the reason to sign muller:

muller can make the life of everyone upfront much easier. he will or can be the central and final part to allow the machine to run in full throttle. we already have carrick/schweini to perform a similar role in mid bottom, but we don't have one who can do similiar things upfront.

adm as an inside is the most closest player who can do that. memphis may not be up there, yet at least. and pereira is the future. if we want to see the immediate effect by the coming season, muller is an ideal canditate.

no matter bale nor ronaldo nor adm as a winger won't have such kind of effect despite they've all got a similar price tag
 
Karl Heinz!!!!! If there is one thing I know about bayern Munich management, They stick to their words and it doesn't matter even if they lose money they would not let their pride go down in any case. I remember the case of mark van bommel and Owen Hargreaves, media kept on presuming that after buying van bommel they would let Owen leave for united. Karl-Heinz said no, not this year and despite every effort which united made, even presumed contact with owen behind their back's, it did not happen that year.
and I recently read somewhere, Karl Heinz said that the only player going out is bastian then I would think that this would be the case only
 
If you're referring to before Bale went to Real - we did put an offer to Spurs for over £100m, but Bale only wanted to go to Real. We also wanted Ronnie for similar money also. Both of those stories are widely accepted as being true..

"widely accepted" and being confirmed are 2 very different things.

Not even one reliable news channel reported an official bid at the time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.