paulscholes18
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2013
- Messages
- 20,727
No you need to wait for 49 men to be thrown overGoodness me I have to wait for 50 men to be thrown over ropes to see the main event.
No you need to wait for 49 men to be thrown overGoodness me I have to wait for 50 men to be thrown over ropes to see the main event.
No you need to wait for 49 men to be thrown over
EC3 was out first. Who did that guy piss off? Seriously?
Well if I asked “realistically should Lars Sullivan be WWE Champion?” You can be literal and answer “yes he’s huge and would kill people” or “no he’s been in it 2 minutes and he’s boring and shit”I have absolutely no idea what you mean by “realistic.” I don’t think you know what that word means
Goofy bastards who drew money and interest. Kofi does neither.
I don’t mean realistic as in who would win real fights. But realistic as in who should be fronting the company. Daniel Bryan would get killed if it was real, but he’s the best thing in WWE by a landslide and a very realistic worthy top class Champion
And that’s fair enoughJust because he's champ doesn't mean he's fronting the company. Also, Kofi and New Day are insanely over, so I have literally no idea where you've plucked this "doesn't draw" thing from.
It's quite obvious that Roman, Seth, Becky and Charlotte are actually the faces of the company, but the roster is so much bigger these days and people are so fatigued with the same people holding the belts (for what were almost pointlessly short reigns at times) that it's better for them to give different people a look in, and actually treat the title as a top prize, rather than pointlessly trading it between the same three or four guys.
He wrestled in the independent scene in America as Manny Faberino. He made a name for himself at Hoodslam and other promotions before being picked up by NXT. He's not a bad performer, and given the handshake between he and Ali, this looks like another move towards WWE appearing progressive (along with showing off Saudi Arabia).Not heard of this guy
And that’s fair enough
But give it to someone good enough to be WWE Champion.
You’re not honestly telling me Kofi is a good WWE Champion. Even the Intercontinental title looked stupid on him. He’s a tag team Champion and absolutely nothing more
I actually forgot that this was the main event! I just stopped watching before realising there was one more match.Not sure if I’m gonna bother with main event, it’s gonna be awful
Corbin against Rollins again at stomping grounds
I couldn’t really tell, but it looked like it was Goldberg that kept botching?What a mess of a main event. Neither the Undertaker nor Goldberg looked like they could last the match. Even the crowd realised that it was getting worse as the match went on. Oh well, at least this PPV has finally ended.
Yup, Goldberg was screwing up most of the spots. Taker then gave up and threw a 2nd chokeslam to end the match.I couldn’t really tell, but it looked like it was Goldberg that kept botching?
Undertaker looked visibly pissed off after the match
I thought he did. Tbh, moments before he dropped him i was legit thinking to myself, this feeds gonna cut away any second now because hes gonna break his neck.It wasn't just Goldberg. I was thinking the Tombstone looked bad on first viewing and someone screenshot it...
Could've killed him. Piss off and retire Taker.
retire Taker.
So you don't know what realistically means because this is not what it means. It's not the same as "do you think it's a good idea." I mean, having a realistic champion is probably a good idea, but they're not one and the same. Kevin Nash/Diesel was a realistic champion, but shit. If English isn't your first language then I'm sorry because I realise I might seem like a prick in that case.Well if I asked “realistically should Lars Sullivan be WWE Champion?” You can be literal and answer “yes he’s huge and would kill people” or “no he’s been in it 2 minutes and he’s boring and shit”
Realistically you don’t put the title on Lars. Realistically you don’t put the title on Kofi.
Honestly I don’t really watch wrestling beyond going to my cousin’s to watch Mania/the Rumble if I’ve nothing else on. That and OSW/Wrestle Me podcast (which I really enjoy actually). But for this thread, I wouldn’t know kofi was still champion! This "easily amused" doesn't apply to me and besides is only an attempt to deflect or maybe insult (?) anyway, not substantive. But I'm sure it made you feel good.If you think Kofi is a good Choice for WWE Champion, then good for you. I’d love to be so easily amused
You dont though. How upsetting would be if you paid to watch wrestling live, paid to watch taker, and he came out stunk the place up like that for ya? Id be so upset.Close the Tv. I want to watch him live once.
You dont though. How upsetting would be if you paid to watch wrestling live, paid to watch taker, and he came out stunk the place up like that for ya? Id be so upset.
So you don't know what realistically means because this is not what it means. It's not the same as "do you think it's a good idea." I mean, having a realistic champion is probably a good idea, but they're not one and the same. Kevin Nash/Diesel was a realistic champion, but shit. If English isn't your first language then I'm sorry because I realise I might seem like a prick in that case.
Honestly I don’t really watch wrestling beyond going to my cousin’s to watch Mania/the Rumble if I’ve nothing else on. That and OSW/Wrestle Me podcast (which I really enjoy actually). But for this thread, I wouldn’t know kofi was still champion! This "easily amused" doesn't apply to me and besides is only an attempt to deflect or maybe insult (?) anyway, not substantive. But I'm sure it made you feel good.