We got frustrated with Ferguson for playing the likes of Giggs in midfield over upcoming young players and you guys criticize Barcelona for not playing him enough when they have Busquets, Xavi, Fabregas and Iniesta?
101 appearances (wiki, not the most reliable I know) for a 22 (just) year old for what some herald as the greatest side ever is quite some faith they've shown in the kid. Would he have got more for United at 22? And even if he had, by how much? Not a great deal more, even though our midfield is surely much easier to break into than theirs.
Barcelona set themselves up for a fall with the clause - however, he was injured earlier in the season. And, do we really believe that they should have been playing him just to make sure he hits his clause? Judging from the Rooney thread, most of our fans believe that you should want to play for our club - and if a player doesn't, let them leave. Would Ferguson have given in to a players contract, and played them simply to satisfy their contract?
Of course, he is a huge talent and a huge loss for Barcelona - but I don't believe they have done a great deal wrong here.