Genius Me!
Proud EE fan, 10k club member & NSFW crew member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2011
- Messages
- 16,180
The quiet before the storm. It's on.
He'd do well at Mourinho's Chelsea.
The quiet before the storm. It's on.
I'm curious but why do so many people see him as a CM that can play in a 2 man midfield. I actually think he would struggle immensely and especially in the PL. If anything I would say he is more of an AMC that can also play CM in a 3 man midfield like the one at Barca but his defensive abilities have never impressed me tbh.
If anything I feel he is more of the Iniesta type of player in a 3 man midfield and not the Xavi or even Busquets, which imo are two players that are much more suited to play in a CM pairing in a 4-2-3-1/4-4-1-1, which I assume is what we will be playing under Moyes.
Or am I just underestimating his defensive ability?
I'm curious but why do so many people see him as a CM that can play in a 2 man midfield. I actually think he would struggle immensely and especially in the PL. If anything I would say he is more of an AMC that can also play CM in a 3 man midfield like the one at Barca but his defensive abilities have never impressed me tbh.
If anything I feel he is more of the Iniesta type of player in a 3 man midfield and not the Xavi or even Busquets, which imo are two players that are much more suited to play in a CM pairing in a 4-2-3-1/4-4-1-1, which I assume is what we will be playing under Moyes.
Or am I just underestimating his defensive ability?
I'm curious but why do so many people see him as a CM that can play in a 2 man midfield. I actually think he would struggle immensely and especially in the PL. If anything I would say he is more of an AMC that can also play CM in a 3 man midfield like the one at Barca but his defensive abilities have never impressed me tbh.
If anything I feel he is more of the Iniesta type of player in a 3 man midfield and not the Xavi or even Busquets, which imo are two players that are much more suited to play in a CM pairing in a 4-2-3-1/4-4-1-1, which I assume is what we will be playing under Moyes.
Or am I just underestimating his defensive ability?
Thiago, in my opinion, would be a luxury signing.
He's a want, more than a need.
Thiago, in my opinion, would be a luxury signing.
He's a want, more than a need.
I also dont get why people dont consider the people playing as a #10 a midfielder. I mean Kagawa is an attacking MIDFIELDER. That means that in itself in a midfield 3. We dont necessarily need to play a proper DM right in front of the back four to be considered as a midfield 3.
Thiago, in my opinion, would be a luxury signing.
He's a want, more than a need.
I think he is better than Cleverley and Anderson right now. However, I think if we buy him then it would severely disrupt Cleverley's progress into the first team as a regular.
Yes kid cunto, when did we ever need a classy midfielder.
I think he is better than Cleverley and Anderson right now. However, I think if we buy him then it would severely disrupt Cleverley's progress into the first team as a regular.
What the hell is a 'classy midfielder'?
I wasn't aware that a place in our first-eleven is to be reserved for Tom Cleverley. Usually statements like this are used when referencing older players who are in their prime right now. If signing a player 2 years younger than Cleverley would hurt his route into the team, then it would simply be a testimony that we can do better than Tom Cleverley. Thiago is younger and better than Cleverley, why would we actively plan to have an inferior player in ourmidfleld long-term?
Thiago, in my opinion, would be a luxury signing.
He's a want, more than a need.
I think he is better than Cleverley and Anderson right now. However, I think if we buy him then it would severely disrupt Cleverley's progress into the first team as a regular.
I agree with your point, although I don't think it's always accurate to describe a #10 as a midfielder. Rooney, when he plays there, drops far deeper than Kagawa did when he played there for Dortmund, and yet most people considered Kagawa an AM and Rooney a creative striker. Kagawa at Dortmund, for me, wasn't really a midfielder. He was very positionally disciplined about not dropping into the middle of the park if possible, instead trusting the midfielders to get the ball to him high up the pitch where he could use that 'explosive' creativity of his to create instant chances. So though he wasn't a striker, exactly, he wasn't a midfielder because he didn't play in the middle of the field.
I dont think I have seen anyone call Rooney a creative striker. He is also a CAM. And again I disagree when you said Kagawa didnt drop deep for Dortmund. He was one of their main instigator of counter attacks. When his team did not have possession, he was constantly in his own half or even as deep as the end of the kick off circle in HIS half. He was high up the pitch (in and around the penalty box) when his team had the ball and were attacking. Their whole team pushed up, so he didnt need to drop deeper to get the ball.
Seriously?! On here, all I ever see is people saying 'Rooney's not a midfielder, he's a striker.' About half of the posts criticising him or our use of him in the endlessly frustrating Wayne Rooney thread start that way. Which is ridiculous, again, because his average position on the pitch is ridiculously deep because he can't resist dropping right into the middle of the park to try and get the ball or get things going.
He is not a CENTRAL MIDFIELDER. He is an attacking midfielder. And I have no problems with him dropping back to help. I get pissed off if he is played next to Carrick as well. Thats not his position and no matter how versatile he seems he will not fit in there well.
Why did we start talking about Rooney in the Thiago thread? We need more Thiago muppetry/youtube comilations to bring the conversation back.
I don't think I have mentioned it on the new site. So, I am going to reiterate it - He'll be announced as a United player once the U21 Euros are done.
#gutITK
It's in Spanish, but here's the latest f.a.p material.
It's in Spanish, but here's the latest f.a.p material.
OK! Maybe I'm not getting it. Explain because I'm in the dark now.Meh, he's not a 'need'.
Barca will prefer selling him to a club that accepts their "buy back" terms a la Bojan.
Barca will prefer selling him to a club that accepts their "buy back" terms a la Bojan.