fastwalker
Full Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2019
- Messages
- 415
Arithmetically, going into this match, we still had top four ambitions. In theory we still do. Unfortunately we come out of a game that we needed to win and could have lost, with a draw. I am struggling to wrap my head around what will motivate these players? We are currently looking to recruit a new manager and in theory, Ralf Rangnick will be on the payroll when the new manager arrives to give him the handover notes. Even if our players have decided that they no longer want to put a committed shift in for Ralf, surely they must realise that they are in the shop window for the new manager?
There was a prevailing view that the players turned against Jose because of his combative management style and it was evident through the erratic, weak as dishwater performance towards the end of Ole's tenure, that the players had grown tired of him as well. We already know that Ralf has ruffled feathers and rubbed some of the players the wrong way, so now we are hoping that the new manager will come in and put things right. Really? This week we announced an extended and improved contract for Bruno, admittedly one of our better performers over the past two years and it is clear that Luke Shaw is angling for a new deal as well. Doubtless, between now and the summer there may be other extended deals announced, giving players continued leverage and influence.
I am hopeful that the new manager will succeed, but everything that I am seeing suggests that he may well be forced to run a race with his shoe laces tied together.
What do others think? Why should the new manager be any more successful in motivating the players than his predecessors?
There was a prevailing view that the players turned against Jose because of his combative management style and it was evident through the erratic, weak as dishwater performance towards the end of Ole's tenure, that the players had grown tired of him as well. We already know that Ralf has ruffled feathers and rubbed some of the players the wrong way, so now we are hoping that the new manager will come in and put things right. Really? This week we announced an extended and improved contract for Bruno, admittedly one of our better performers over the past two years and it is clear that Luke Shaw is angling for a new deal as well. Doubtless, between now and the summer there may be other extended deals announced, giving players continued leverage and influence.
I am hopeful that the new manager will succeed, but everything that I am seeing suggests that he may well be forced to run a race with his shoe laces tied together.
What do others think? Why should the new manager be any more successful in motivating the players than his predecessors?