The Trump Presidency - Part 2

I can’t help thinking there’s no turning back for America at this point. A combination of AI, misinformation and voter suppression will ensure JD’s win in 28 (or Trump’s if he feels like it).

Americans increasingly get their news from social media, which are of course owned by Musk and Zuckerberg, and from where the algorithms will force feed users with subtle and not so subtle propaganda memes and videos. Some of them have even creeped into my feed and I live thousands of miles away.
Only thing that will turn the tide is living conditions becoming so poor for the average working stiff that a full blown revolt happens. If the right stay in power for long enough eventually they'll get the blame.
 
Watching the full 50min clip, it's odd but it felt like US and Ukraine weren't 100% on the same page even though there was an agreement to be signed. Trump kept focusing on how signing the deal was the most imp thing while dodging questions on how security would be ensured while Zelensky kept saying ceasefire isn't enough when Russia can't be relied upon to hold their end of a deal without military deterrence.

Bizarre all around and went to absolute shit when Vance decided to chime in.
That's not odd, that's exactly what happened. This was always meant to happen.
 
Yep, and if he doesn’t get the minerals with ukraines permission he will make a deal with Russia to get them. He’s already laying the groundwork by saying big US corporates could work from Moscow
He’s all about getting those minerals. He doesn’t give a shit about peace. That’s not his priority

Yep. And I don’t think they would hesitate to do the same with any other European country, or elsewhere. They’re looking to exploit wherever they can.

Personally I believe they’re looking to carve up as many countries as they can and share the spoils with Russia and China.
 
It takes its time but demonstrations can and will influence political courses eventually.

I agree with your second paragraph. The only constructive way to go about this is to reduce dependencies on the US which consequentially reduced its geopolitical influence. Maybe this crisis is the push Europe for instance needed to get their act together and see through some much need changes to become more competitive again.

But let's be real, a US with no moral restraints is very, very scary. People rightfully point out their aggressive geopolitics, especially under Republican presidents, but they never were a rogue state and what Trump is now doing is already out of the already ambigous moral codex the US has acted upon so far.
The EU & UK’s economy is > than the US. And that’s excluding western allies such as Norway, Switzerland, Canada, Australia, etc. So ‘getting act together’ is underestimating the strength of Europe and its allies. Europe does need to start putting on a more unified approach though.
 
I wonder if the people who ridiculed the idea of Russia being a threat to NATO countries, or the idea of the US not defending a NATO country under aggression, have changed their tune yet. Probably not.
 
Yep. And I don’t think they would hesitate to do the same with any other European country, or elsewhere. They’re looking to exploit wherever they can.

Personally I believe they’re looking to carve up as many countries as they can and share the spoils with Russia and China.
Yep and I think that’s his reason why he’s trying to break up NATO. They want to power grab.
 
I wonder if the people who ridiculed the idea of Russia being a threat to NATO countries, or the idea of the US not defending a NATO country under aggression, have changed their tune yet. Probably not.
There’s going to be some fireworks with the White House and the US military brass.
 
And by not voting, you voted for somebody who doubles down on the genocide enabling and on top of it supports an imperialistic invasion.

You could have voted for Harris and then went on the streets to demonstrate, contacted your representatives to criticize the Democrats' Israel politics but you chose to do nothing and now there's a president in office who is much worse than the other option, wants to turn Gaza into a luxus resort and generally accepts every geopolitical maneuver by other countries, no matter how despicable it is, as long as he profits from it. I get your line of thinking, I really do, but this can't have been the best option. Not for Palestinians, not for Ukraine, not for the US.

The representative has no incentive to listen if the vote is secure either way. They wouldn't give a shit.

We can do the "blame the non-voters" thing (not really referring to you here, but to the specific few users who have been beating that drum hard for months), but if we are to do that, we should be fair:

The people who say you should always vote for the lesser evil are then to blame for every single thing the status quo parties won't change. Keeping it to the US, all US support for Israel is their fault. The lack of universal healthcare is their fault. Basically any politically fixable societal ill is their fault. The American Civil Rights Movement, and almost all social progress, succeeded despite of them, and would have succeeded even more if not for people like them.

If the populace don't use their political power, or at least credibly threaten to, then nothing ever changes. Now, if these users would bite that bullet and admit it, then that would at least be something, but they won't even do that. They'll deny deny deny while shouting at others.
 
The representative has no incentive to listen if the vote is secure either way. They wouldn't give a shit.

We can do the "blame the non-voters" thing (not really referring to you here, but to the specific few users who have been beating that drum hard for months), but if we are to do that, we should be fair:

The people who say you should always vote for the lesser evil are then to blame for every single thing the status quo parties won't change. Keeping it to the US, all US support for Israel is their fault. The lack of universal healthcare is their fault. Basically any politically fixable societal ill is their fault. The American Civil Rights Movement, and almost all social progress, succeeded despite of them, and would have succeeded even more if not for people like them.

If the populace don't use their political power, or at least credibly threaten to, then nothing ever changes. Now, if these users would bite that bullet and admit it, then that would at least be something, but they won't even do that. They'll deny deny deny while shouting at others.

:lol: that third paragraph is gas.
 
Yep. And I don’t think they would hesitate to do the same with any other European country, or elsewhere. They’re looking to exploit wherever they can.

Personally I believe they’re looking to carve up as many countries as they can and share the spoils with Russia and China.
The situation reminds me of the Treaty of Tordesillas, where Spain and Portugal carved up the entire world between them, ignoring the views of anyone else. That lines up well with Trump’s simplistic, transactional world view. He’s incapable of thinking in any other way.
 
I’m not saying it to defend Trump or Vance in any way. They are vile and dangerous. But Trump’s one defining trait is his vanity, and this press conference was supposed to be a victory ceremony for him. Zelenskyy seemingly came to challenge him in front of the TV cameras. He also chose not to take direct advice from the Trump seem and wear a suit. Yes, it’s pretty as feck but Trump is petty and it’s no surprise he reacted badly. Zelenskyy came to show defiance in front of a leader who demands servility. He then took the bait and got provoked by Vance. He probably would have played his cards better by sucking up to Trump and hoping this mineral deal would lead to closer ties, is all I’m saying.
Trump made an earlier comment that he was happy with his attire. Trump will be happy no matter how much you kiss his ass. He is an abuser and a narcissist.

His meeting with Trump was going fine and then Vance lit their touch paper and it exploded. You could argue Zelensky could not have taken the bait but that it very difficult. He only made an initial point of a ceasefire being broken by Russia which was true. It was outright bullying and is rightfully being called out. If they carry on like they have in the last month, the administration will implode.
 
The situation reminds me of the Treaty of Tordesillas, where Spain and Portugal carved up the entire world between them, ignoring the views of anyone else. That lines up well with Trump’s simplistic, transactional world view. He’s incapable of thinking in any other way.

And yet they’re still quite a spineless regime, preferring to corner off their allies who have been dependent on them, rather than to rub up against any country that could push back.
 
The EU & UK’s economy is > than the US. And that’s excluding western allies such as Norway, Switzerland, Canada, Australia, etc. So ‘getting act together’ is underestimating the strength of Europe and its allies. Europe does need to start putting on a more unified approach though.

That's what I mean. The European market is enormously fractured, there is no European army, etc. because of various regulations and every country putting their own interests above those of the collective. And we do lack behind in terms of innovation, there are no two ways above it.

Those things primarily stem from vanity and maybe the recent developments are the push needed to set them aside.


The representative has no incentive to listen if the vote is secure either way. They wouldn't give a shit.

We can do the "blame the non-voters" thing (not really referring to you here, but to the specific few users who have been beating that drum hard for months), but if we are to do that, we should be fair:

The people who say you should always vote for the lesser evil are then to blame for every single thing the status quo parties won't change. Keeping it to the US, all US support for Israel is their fault. The lack of universal healthcare is their fault. Basically any politically fixable societal ill is their fault. The American Civil Rights Movement, and almost all social progress, succeeded despite of them, and would have succeeded even more if not for people like them.

If the populace don't use their political power, or at least credibly threaten to, then nothing ever changes. Now, if these users would bite that bullet and admit it, then that would at least be something, but they won't even do that. They'll deny deny deny while shouting at others.

I see your point but let's say Harris would have been elected because critics of her Israel politics voted the lesser evil but still made themselves heard through demonstrations or whatever. Trump losing for a second time could have led to the GoP reassessing their strategies and take more centrist positions again. If they become electable again, the Israel politics of the Democrats would suddenly provide a great opportunity for them to turn voters in their favor again.

I mean, this obviously works much better if there are more than two parties but it still can work.
 
if the UK sides with Trump god help us all
UK will never go against the US, Starmer was pretty much saying this while he was licking Trump's boots the other day.
 
UK will never go against the US, Starmer was pretty much saying this while he was licking Trump's boots the other day.

USA has never backed the Kremlin before

we'll see but I don't expect Kier to take Trump's side
 
That's what I mean. The European market is enormously fractured, there is no European army, etc. because of various regulations and every country putting their own interests above those of the collective. And we do lack behind in terms of innovation, there are no two ways above it.

Those things primarily stem from vanity and maybe the recent developments are the push needed to set them aside.




I see your point but let's say Harris would have been elected because critics of her Israel politics voted the lesser evil but still made themselves heard through demonstrations or whatever. Trump losing for a second time could have led to the GoP reassessing their strategies and take more centrist positions again. If they become electable again, the Israel politics of the Democrats would suddenly provide a great opportunity for them to turn voters in their favor again.

I mean, this obviously works much better if there are more than two parties but it still can work.


There is no European army... that is correct.
But don't forget that Europe is a major player in NATO.

One of the reasons why so many European nations have relied on the US for equipment is the way these deals are structured financially.
But that doesn't have to be the case.
 
Portugal is UK’s oldest bro.
You better not feck us over in favor of Trump otherwise no more debauchery in the Algarve!
 
Ugh, managed to accidentally break my news-avoidance with this last night. What a shameful, disgraceful denigration of the office and of the US's standing. China and Russia should be pretty damn happy today. Few quick thoughts:
1. To all the American liberals and pro-democracy voters who stayed home last fall, f*ck each and every one of you. All 15m of you who couldn't be bothered to get out and show the world that America isn't represented by Donald J Trump and his lackeys. F*ck you. This is on you. Not him. You had the opportunity to avoid this and you turned your holier-than-thou noses up because you weren't energised enough, or fearful enough of what he'd be like, despite every bloody thing on Earth showing you. This is what you were too stupid to vote against. You own it. I'm sorry Harris or literally any one wasn't far enough down your particular issue-hole but this was the alternative, and you knew that, and you did nothing.

2. For the next 4 years world leaders need to not rely on any sense of morals, history or even common decency. If you want something or need something from America, go watch the mob films and rehearse as if you were going to see the Don. Because that's what America is now. Hopefully for only 4 more years. Trump is a mob boss, driven by greed, expecting deference, worship and most importantly quid pro quo in every dealing. He couldn't be any clearer. Ukraine doesn't have cards, I don't give a flying f*ck why, but I have cards, you want cards, you come to me, you better grovel. The GOP will do nothing. Marco 'world order' Rubio can't even see above the top of the damn desk. There's an entire infrastructure in place to ensure whatever dear leader decides today will be paraded as strong, correct and the bestest decision by tomorrow. Do not go high, there is no high with Trump. Grit your teeth and hope things change in 4 years time, or even better, in 2.

3. This is a real, potentially pivotal opportunity for Europe and other sensible countries to unite, and pull their finger out. Stop relying on the US. The populace is too stupid, fat and rich to be relied upon in the future. Elections will swing, but there's no guarantee we won't actually have another Trump as President in the next 3 cycles. Or this one. You can't rely on us. You have to ramp up military spending, your own information warfare systems and so forth.

4.My only hope is that America needed this. It needs to feel the pain it had already forgotten from the first Trump Presidency. It needs to break down the walls of congitive dissonance and willful ignorance that have been put up around the GOP. It needs to feel embarassed, shameful, fearful and resentful every day of this idiot's term. And it needs to vote accordingly in 2 years, and in every other election.
This finger pointing and pseudo moral outrage is getting old, fast.

Get off your high horse and rather ask yourself what went so wrong in the Democratic camp that Harris got dog walked by that orange psychopath in the last elections. "People who didn't vote for [insert your candidate] are stupid" ain't gonna cut it. Unless your Party undergoes a serious introspection, prepare yourself for the next slap in the face in four years. You and the other gatekeepers can then blame whatever minority or group of stupid people who refused to do the "right thing". If the institutions of the land of the free are still standing, that is.

As for Europe, while it would be reaaaally time to get its act together and finally break its US chains, I wouldn't bet my house on it. The second Trump wave has yet to truly hit our shores and we have our own domestic demons to deal with.
 
Last edited:
UK will never go against the US, Starmer was pretty much saying this while he was licking Trump's boots the other day.
I think we’ll try to play the field between both sides as long as possible, but ultimately when push comes to shove, there really is no alternative than to side with Europe. It’s the European continent that’s at stake and the US clearly isn’t a country to rely on for support, no matter how good you think your relationship is.

The Tory right on the other hand may think differently.
 
By the way, Starmer behaved shockingly in the trump meeting. When asked about trump’s plan to annex Canada, he accused the questioner of trying to be divisive. How can the effective leader of the commonwealth not discuss the intention to annex a commonwealth country when he’s meeting the person making the threats? And why is the King sending handwritten invitations to such a person?

Canadians very disappointed in the UK today.
 
Something that irked me about the US for a while is the idea that democracy basically comes down to voting once in a while and that’s it. „Cast your vote, be a good citizen and then shut the feck up, while we do whatever the feck we want“ has basically always been how I’ve seen the US.
This rhetoric is visible a lot these days and it’s part of the issue. People in the US, but also worldwide need to learn, that democracy is more than ordering something from a menu. It demands constant pressure, participation and cooperation from the people.
 
By the way, Starmer behaved shockingly in the trump meeting. When asked about trump’s plan to annex Canada, he accused the questioner of trying to be divisive. How can the effective leader of the commonwealth not discuss the intention to annex a commonwealth country when he’s meeting the person making the threats? And why is the King sending handwritten invitations to such a person?

Canadians very disappointed in the UK today.
I’m so angry about that State Visit invitation. What should have happened is that CRIII should have scheduled a visit to Canada as head of the Commonwealth.
Also - how is the UK allowing a convicted felon into the country? I thought those with a criminal record (including rape) could not visit?
 
I see your point but let's say Harris would have been elected because critics of her Israel politics voted the lesser evil but still made themselves heard through demonstrations or whatever. Trump losing for a second time could have led to the GoP reassessing their strategies and take more centrist positions again. If they become electable again, the Israel politics of the Democrats would suddenly provide a great opportunity for them to turn voters in their favor again.

I mean, this obviously works much better if there are more than two parties but it still can work.
Gaza played no role in Harris' defeat. It became quite the convenient excuse to justify the November debacle and an unending source of schadenfreude for some, though.

That is never going to happen. Aside from geostrategic considerations, the prevalent and widely spread pro-Zionist ideology, the latent as well as institutional racism are too deeply ingrained in the American society, and the Israel lobby too powerful to see a 180° turn in US policy toward Israel, no matter the party in charge.

Hell, even a genocide didn't make them budge one bit. On the contrary, they systematically cracked down, hard, and silenced any form pro-Palestinian support, passed bills to basically criminalize any critic of Israel (eerily similar things happened in Germany in the past 16 months, but you already know that).

And you think that protests are going to change that? Feck both parties, they are two cheeks of the same backside on this topic.
 
Last edited:
I’m so angry about that State Visit invitation. What should have happened is that CRIII should have scheduled a visit to Canada as head of the Commonwealth.
Also - how is the UK allowing a convicted felon into the country? I thought those with a criminal record (including rape) could not visit?
UK is in a vulnerable position. Brexit happened and the UK pushed away from Europe, relations have been strained. Closer ties to the US and beyond was seen as the golden goose. Now the US is turning on its friends and UK-EU ties have only recently started to be rebuilt. UK isn’t in much of a position of power right now.
 
af20e55b-eecb-4284-992c-0b42d4ed56af
 
UK is in a vulnerable position. Brexit happened and the UK pushed away from Europe, relations have been strained. Closer ties to the US and beyond was seen as the golden goose. Now the US is turning on its friends and UK-EU ties have only recently started to be rebuilt. UK isn’t in much of a position of power right now.

On the contrary. UK is still a highly significant part of Europe and that has never been more important than now.
 
I think we’ll try to play the field between both sides as long as possible, but ultimately when push comes to shove, there really is no alternative than to side with Europe. It’s the European continent that’s at stake and the US clearly isn’t a country to rely on for support, no matter how good you think your relationship is.

The Tory right on the other hand may think differently.
I don't think this is true, Brexit proved that there isn't any real feeling of European belonging. UK is pretty much a vassal of the US (to a lesser extent other European countries are too), Iraq pretty much proved this and recently the whole Sacoolas incident .

Starmer looked shit scared in his meeting and looked like he was choosing his words carefully not in a good way, more like he was scared. Inviting for a state visit was even more rediculous, Trump did nothing to earn that and just goes to show he can do whatever he wants and the UK will treat it as a one way 'special relationship' .
 
On the contrary. UK is still a highly significant part of Europe and that has never been more important than now.

The UK’s importance is as a mediator between the US and Europe. We’re out of the EU and the US is acting out against its allies. The role is the tread the line but we’re not as close to either side as we once were.