What is required to amend the constitution?
He can try whatever he wants, without 2/3 of both houses plus 38 states it ain’t happening.
What is required to amend the constitution?
He can try whatever he wants, without 2/3 of both houses plus 38 states it ain’t happening.
The thing I hate most about Trump is that he's so unbelievably stupid, corrupt, unscrupulous and stupid again that he's normalised being an utter bastard. Even someone as useless as Johnson looks better than him. That's how bad Trump is.
It still hasn't sunk in that he won the previous election. How the hell does something like that even happen in a country with over 300M citizens, laughable.
Itll be fascinating to see how history remembers Barr. Either the start of the end of independent judiciary or an errant troll.
So what does that have to do with cinnamon hitler intentionally deceiving the public and failing to act. Or you going to try laughably suggest that a writer is now responsible for leading a country.Doesn't change the fact that he chose not to reveal the information and now stands to profit from it.
On the bolded bit: i don't think anybody is saying that (or I overlooked it). I think people are saying that Woodward, through these conversations with Trump, knew of the risk COVID-19 was bringing to the US, and then noticed Trump deny any such risk on tv and through his (lack of) policies. Woodward would thus have known that Trump's action would make the US very vulnerable and could lead to significant suffering, and Woodward would have known that this could be avoided by proper action in line with what he knew that Trump did know and understand about the virus.
That's the situation Woodward was facing in spring. Back then, he had two choices available to him: (1) release his information immediately, in the hope that it would kick up a storm that would hurt Trump's public image and force him into action against COVID-19; or (2) reserve the information for his book and release it in time before the elections, in the hope it would kick up a storm that would hurt Trump's election chances. You could say that the first option was unlikely to have any effect, but that's no different from the second. In fact, back then, it was still possible that Trump would pivot on COVID-19 due to its severity, in which case the second scenario would have become obsolete. From that point of view, I do think Woodward should rather have chosen for option #1.
Again, as for the racial perspective: I think the idea here is that a privileged White person would have less eye for the impact of a nationwide crisis on people that are not well-off - which includes a disproportionale percentage of people of colour. So Woodward may not have full recognized the impact of the crisis because of his background, hence skewing his opinion towards option #2.
Various posters have been suggesting this now, that blaming Woodward means Trump did nothing wrong. I have no idea where that's coming from; no-one suggested any such thing. If Woodward made the wrong decision, that still means Trump made decisions that were much more wrong and had much more impact. These things are not mutually exclusive.
So what does that have to do with cinnamon hitler intentionally deceiving the public and failing to act. Or you going to try laughably suggest that a writer is now responsible for leading a country.
Yes, because you can only focus on one thing at any one time, and there can only be one person who has any responsibility towards anything on a given subject. So we can only talk about Trump when it comes to COVID-19 in the US and criticizing Woodward in any way is unthinkable. Got it.Blaming Woodward is narcissistic blame shifting and gaslighting with divisive intent.
Guess what I knew that Trump was lying back in March as well am I now culpable too. I have no authority to affect policy just as Woodward doesn’t.
If you are focusing on Woodward you’ve lost the plot.
as if you're going to get an answer.
It’s sad when you realize someone you know has internalized anti answernessI'm shocked he hasn't replied, shocked!
At least learn what is required to amend the constitution before coming out with this kind of shit.
Blaming Woodward is narcissistic blame shifting and gaslighting with divisive intent.
Guess what I knew that Trump was lying back in March as well am I now culpable too. I have no authority to affect policy just as Woodward doesn’t.
If you are focusing on Woodward you’ve lost the plot.
Let’s agree that Woodward was derelict in reporting was does that have to do with Trump failing to act in February?Yes, because you can only focus on one thing at any one time, and there can only be one person who has any responsibility towards anything on a given subject. So we can only talk about Trump when it comes to COVID-19 in the US and criticizing Woodward in any way is unthinkable. Got it.
I prefer my discussions more nuanced, but oh well.
I’m well aware that by the rules it’s ‘impossible’ but when he and the rest of them aren’t playing by the rules and haven’t for the past four years what makes you think they’ll stop him?
I mean if in the extremely unlikely event that they aren’t able to successfully cheat their way through this election do you think Trump is going to actually leave the White House when he’s supposed to?
Yes. If not by free will then he'll be escorted out of the White House. It really is that simple - Trump's signature no longer carries any more legal weight after january 20 2021 unless he is re-elected.
Ok, but here's my worry. Trump tries this and gets a certain fevrent amount of the country behind him. His usual lackeys in a still-GOP-held Senate foam at the mouth about how it's the only way forward for the country to keep it safe from the lying cheating anarchist Dems. A number of extremely red states declare they want the constitution changed.
What then? It doesn't have to reach the legal threshold to destroy the country.
Edit: we were talking about this happening if he gets another term, not this year. He definitely won't be able to do to this term, but after four more years of court stacking and gradually pushing fascist militarisation of policing, he could.
I doubt Pence is actually a human being. For a start his hair looks like it's a sprayed on Lego toupée, his posture makes you wonder if all his bones are made of solid iron, and his face has a certain doll like quality - like his skin has been glued on. He surely must be an android of some sort. He creeps me out!I doubt Pence is electable, but other than that it sounds grand
Yes. If not by free will then he'll be escorted out of the White House. It really is that simple - Trump's signature no longer carries any more legal weight after january 20 2021 unless he is re-elected.
Have you maybe noticed there have been quite a few things done recently on Trumps orders that aren’t exactly legal? Do you think it was legal for the police to tear gas and baton a crowd of peaceful protestors so Trump could walk to a church?
This idea that the right thing will end up happening is dangerous. You have to make sure at every step of the way, these people are scum.
What is more realistic is him sabotaging the voting process so he can claim victory on election night before all the absentees have been counted, and then stuff the courts with filings for election fraudI agree with the bolded part, but the idea that Trump is going to «grab power» if he loses the election is absurd.
How, in practical terms, would that work? He has no authority after january 20 2021 unless he is re-elected. The US military would no longer answer to him (recent polls show that he has very little support among army personnel), the guy with the football would leave his side etc and power would automatically be transferred to the president-elect.
I agree with the bolded part, but the idea that Trump is going to «grab power» if he loses the election is absurd.
How, in practical terms, would that work? He has no authority after january 20 2021 unless he is re-elected. The US military would no longer answer to him (recent polls show that he has very little support among army personnel), the guy with the football would leave his side etc and power would automatically be transferred to the president-elect.
What is more realistic is him sabotaging the voting process so he can claim victory on election night before all the absentees have been counted, and then stuff the courts with filings for election fraud
If Biden has a big lead already on election night, then there is very little Trump can do. But that is not very likely IMO, the key states are getting closer .
She will get a nice hairdo at least!That is absolutely true. However, if the dispute is not resolved by january 20 that doesn’t mean that Trump would remain president. In that case, I believe the job would go to the Speaker of the House
I agree with the bolded part, but the idea that Trump is going to «grab power» if he loses the election is absurd.
How, in practical terms, would that work? He has no authority after january 20 2021 unless he is re-elected. The US military would no longer answer to him (recent polls show that he has very little support among army personnel), the guy with the football would leave his side etc and power would automatically be transferred to the president-elect.
It almost certainly won't happen of course. Just as a theoretical however, it would start with Trump insisting the election had been stolen and the Republican states refusing to sign off. You'd have mass protests which would inevitably face mass anti-Trump protests and lead to massive violence. Bear in mind all this would be happening in November, and Trump is still legitimately president then for 2 more months. He would then activate the national guard and probably try to activate regular military units, leading to a standoff with the chiefs of staff who he'd then replace. At this point violence is occurring hourly all over the country, the media is in complete meltdown and the clamour for the Supreme Court to intervene would be deafening. Except there probably isn't anything for the Supreme Court to actually rule on. The election was won fair and square by Biden. So Trump ratchets up his 'enemies of the people' rhetoric about SCOTUS this time, and tells his tens of millions of supporters that SCOTUS is part of the deep state/liberal puppets etc. By now there is absolute chaos, nobody knows what is going on, there are riots and violent clashes all over the country, politicians are coming out giving wildly inflammatory and contradictory opinions and making demands, and then.. who the feck knows. It's never happened before, it's totally unprecedented, so literally nobody knows what happens next.
I'd add that, in this kind of scenario, Trump would probably declare a State of Emergency somewhere along the way. No idea what that really means in the US, but I suppose it's something Trump as the still-sitting president could use to his advantage.This is exactly what Trump wants to be fair.
I mentioned this before, but I think it's possible that audio recordings of Trump admitting the seriousness of COVID-19 might have further ramped up public pressure on him. Trump cares about people's impressions of him more than anything else, so this may have made him respond with more serious public statements and measures on COVID-19.Let’s agree that Woodward was derelict in reporting was does that have to do with Trump failing to act in February?
It almost certainly won't happen of course. Just as a theoretical however, it would start with Trump insisting the election had been stolen and the Republican states refusing to sign off. You'd have mass protests which would inevitably face mass anti-Trump protests and lead to massive violence. Bear in mind all this would be happening in November, and Trump is still legitimately president then for 2 more months. He would then activate the national guard and probably try to activate regular military units, leading to a standoff with the chiefs of staff who he'd then replace. At this point violence is occurring hourly all over the country, the media is in complete meltdown and the clamour for the Supreme Court to intervene would be deafening. Except there probably isn't anything for the Supreme Court to actually rule on. The election was won fair and square by Biden. So Trump ratchets up his 'enemies of the people' rhetoric about SCOTUS this time, and tells his tens of millions of supporters that SCOTUS is part of the deep state/liberal puppets etc. By now there is absolute chaos, nobody knows what is going on, there are riots and violent clashes all over the country, politicians are coming out giving wildly inflammatory and contradictory opinions and making demands, and then.. who the feck knows. It's never happened before, it's totally unprecedented, so literally nobody knows what happens next.
He's a closet homosexual who is wound so fecking tight that he can't even touch his own dick to piss. That's my impression anyway.I doubt Pence is actually a human being. For a start his hair looks like it's a sprayed on Lego toupée, his posture makes you wonder if all his bones are made of solid iron, and his face has a certain doll like quality - like his skin has been glued on. He surely must be an android of some sort. He creeps me out!
He's a closet homosexual who is wound so fecking tight that he can't even touch his own dick to piss. That's my impression anyway.
That is absolutely true. However, if the dispute is not resolved by january 20 that doesn’t mean that Trump would remain president. In that case, I believe the job would go to the Speaker of the House
I doubt Pence is actually a human being. For a start his hair looks like it's a sprayed on Lego toupée, his posture makes you wonder if all his bones are made of solid iron, and his face has a certain doll like quality - like his skin has been glued on. He surely must be an android of some sort. He creeps me out!
Too much emphasis on the military when he is setting up a litigation strategy based on Bush v Gore. The Supreme Court insisted on deciding that long before Jan.20 and that is what Trump will be trying for.
He'll declare victory the day after elections then file in courts to prevent mail-in ballots based on fraud. The SCOTUS will hear the case and resolve long before Jan.20 because the much less ideological Rehnquist court already set that precedent.
Trump will use the same argument Scalia used for Bush. Further counting of mail-in ballots will violate Trump's constitutional rights by delegitimizing the President and thus, in the best interests of the country the counting of ballots will be stopped. This legal argument worked in Bush v Gore so with the more conservative Roberts court its a fair chance Trump goes for that gamble.
Only way it doesn't work is if Biden wins resoundingly in every swing state. I'm not saying I think Trump using November to claim victory and clog the courts will definitely work or even that he will definitely do it, but its certainly well within the realm of possibility and everyone should be prepared for it.
He's a closet homosexual who is wound so fecking tight that he can't even touch his own dick to piss. That's my impression anyway.