The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated

Status
Not open for further replies.
Trump immediately after everyone laughed at him at the UN: "I didn't expect that reaction".
Trump in New York when asked about how it felt to be laughed at: "That was meant to get some laughter".

Trump after being bullied in school: "ow that hurt I'm telling father"
Trump in New York when asked about how it felt to be bullied: "I wasn't bullied I told them to push me that was just us playing the pushing game I wasn't bullied"
 
You might be right and I've never been through this other than the account of my lawyer GF at the time telling me about dealing with it for doctors and other researchers. I just never thought someone would need to claim benefits when they have such good qualification and prospects.

That’s a very strange comment. Social welfare systems the world over aren’t just queues of uneducated people. If person A is qualified but loses their job, it’s not easy just to just walk into a similar job the next day. In this case person A should be entitled to social welfare help. Bizarre
 
That’s a very strange comment. Social welfare systems the world over aren’t just queues of uneducated people. If person A is qualified but loses their job, it’s not easy just to just walk into a similar job the next day. In this case person A should be entitled to social welfare help. Bizarre

I don't know, I've been taught from childhood to have savings that would cover 6 months of work loss if I were to ever lose a job and that definitely came in handy when I was laid off during the recession from my first ever job out of college. May be, just a different demographic culture. Now that I live in Scandinavia, I have a completely different view of the welfare system as a lot of undergrad students get welfare money to cover education expenses and its not seen as a bad thing, in the US being on welfare always had negative connotations.
 
I don't know, I've been taught from childhood to have savings that would cover 6 months of work loss if I were to ever lose a job and that definitely came in handy when I was laid off during the recession from my first ever job out of college. May be, just a different demographic culture. Now that I live in Scandinavia, I have a completely different view of the welfare system as a lot of undergrad students get welfare money to cover education expenses and its not seen as a bad thing, in the US being on welfare always had negative connotations.

Yes it does have negative a connotation which is ridiculous. Especially when the government gets more benefits than anyone.
 
I don't know, I've been taught from childhood to have savings that would cover 6 months of work loss if I were to ever lose a job and that definitely came in handy when I was laid off during the recession from my first ever job out of college. May be, just a different demographic culture. Now that I live in Scandinavia, I have a completely different view of the welfare system as a lot of undergrad students get welfare money to cover education expenses and its not seen as a bad thing, in the US being on welfare always had negative connotations.

I would guess that at least 95% of Norwegian students get student loans from the state, a certain percentage of which will automatically turn into grants if the students pass their classes. And that's while higher education is free, so it's mostly to pay for housing and such. I don't know the situation in Denmark or Sweden, but I suspect it's similar.

However, while there is no stigma to student loans/grants, there definitely still exists some stigma towards claiming unemployment benefits. Long term, at least. Almost certainly not as bad as the US, but it still exists. But overall the welfare state is an accepted fact. I'm not sure a single serious political party is in favour of genuinely deconstructing it. Even the Conservatives and Liberals, who are in general favour of privatization, consider the welfare state as a fundamentally sound concept.
 
I would guess that at least 95% of Norwegian students get student loans from the state, a certain percentage of which will automatically turn into grants if the students pass their classes. And that's while higher education is free, so it's mostly to pay for housing and such. I don't know the situation in Denmark or Sweden, but I suspect it's similar.

However, while there is no stigma to student loans/grants, there definitely still exists some stigma towards claiming unemployment benefits. Long term, at least. Almost certainly not as bad as the US, but it still exists. But overall the welfare state is an accepted fact. I'm not sure a single serious political party is in favour of genuinely deconstructing it. Even the Conservatives and Liberals, who are in general favour of privatization, consider the welfare state as a fundamentally sound concept.
In Denmark all students over 18 enrolled at a university (and other deserving educations) get ~£600 per month from the state for up to five and a half years. You can then decide to take a loan on top of that of up to ~£350 if you want to (very low interest). And there's no tuition fee.
Almost the same rules for other EU citizens, but they have to work some amount of hours per week to get the ~£600. 10 or 15 or something.
 
I would guess that at least 95% of Norwegian students get student loans from the state, a certain percentage of which will automatically turn into grants if the students pass their classes. And that's while higher education is free, so it's mostly to pay for housing and such. I don't know the situation in Denmark or Sweden, but I suspect it's similar.

However, while there is no stigma to student loans/grants, there definitely still exists some stigma towards claiming unemployment benefits. Long term, at least. Almost certainly not as bad as the US, but it still exists. But overall the welfare state is an accepted fact. I'm not sure a single serious political party is in favour of genuinely deconstructing it. Even the Conservatives and Liberals, who are in general favour of privatization, consider the welfare state as a fundamentally sound concept.
Similar to Ireland. Our social welfare is massive and as such heavily abused by those who don't want to work (ever). I don't know about Norway but it infuriates the working/middle class here because it's an expensive country and having children is very expensive if you work, so most who do can only afford 2-3, whilst those who don't pop out as many as they possibly can to get all the extra welfare that comes from it.

To be fair though it's nothing compared to the pension. Absolutely decimates our budget every year and even during the recession it was the only thing not to receive any cuts at all because they wouldn't dare do so and lose those voters.
 
Similar to Ireland. Our social welfare is massive and as such heavily abused by those who don't want to work (ever). I don't know about Norway but it infuriates the working/middle class here because it's an expensive country and having children is very expensive if you work, so most who do can only afford 2-3, whilst those who don't pop out as many as they possibly can to get all the extra welfare that comes from it.

To be fair though it's nothing compared to the pension. Absolutely decimates our budget every year and even during the recession it was the only thing not to receive any cuts at all because they wouldn't dare do so and lose those voters.
How much of the budget do people abusing the system account for?
 
Fiona Hill, Trump's top expert on Russia, is quietly shaping a tougher U.S. policy

Trump has bestowed considerable authority on a woman who has none of the usual markers of influence in the Trump administration. Hill is not a billionaire, nor a Fox News regular. She does not golf or tweet. In a city of partisanship and self-promotion, Hill eschews both. People who’ve known her for years profess not to know her political affiliation.
...
Yet Hill and her peers have managed to craft a Russia policy that is, by any measure — sanctions, expulsions, military buildup — tougher than that of the Obama administration. Trump has not always championed this approach, but he apparently hasn’t hindered Hill and her colleagues on the National Security Council or in the State Department from doing their work. He has, in effect, sanctioned a Russia policy that is entirely at odds with his own pronouncements.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fiona-hi...y-090025600.html?soc_src=hl-viewer&soc_trk=fb
 


Wtf?

This comes after he caused all the shit with the embassy relocation AND said he didn't mind if it came to a one state solution! The man is a fecking imbecile ffs.

Oh and..



Distraction mode in full effect. Nothing to see here folks!
 


Wtf?

This comes after he caused all the shit with the embassy relocation AND said he didn't mind if it came to a one state solution! The man is a fecking imbecile ffs.

Oh and..



Distraction mode in full effect. Nothing to see here folks!


Would be surprised if he has the slightest clue about Israel-Palestine to be honest.
 
If you want to see what he's like when he's feeling embarrassed and humiliated just watch the White House Correspondents Dinner where Obama took him to pieces.
That's what spurred him on to run as president ,and he's been obsessed with Obama and destroying his legacy ever since.
 


Wtf?

This comes after he caused all the shit with the embassy relocation AND said he didn't mind if it came to a one state solution! The man is a fecking imbecile ffs.

Oh and..



Distraction mode in full effect. Nothing to see here folks!

What a sad twat. So why did you move your embassy to Jerusalem? :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.