K2K
Full Member
I never said they are. I said we are not winning it.Title are not decided in november. Its a crazy league.
It was obvious we weren't winning it in September of last year.
I never said they are. I said we are not winning it.Title are not decided in november. Its a crazy league.
As I said before, I am not ready to concede just yet. Call me a fool - a romantic - whatever ... just takes one result to create tension for this team. If you were placing a bet, of course it’s City’s. If they win, they deserve it. But I am still pleased with where we are at. Just a few missing pieces. Pep had a year head start to get to this point. So if not this year, we will take another crack at it next year.
Had a real laugh at the changed title to this thread!
I never said they are. I said we are not winning it.
It was obvious we weren't winning it in September of last year.
Birgiristan has been buying for pep since 2012. KDB would be bayern bound if not for peps politics.
Have you been living under a rock for the last 4 years?We are not tottenham or arsenal that you can say this with conviction.
Yep, I agree.I never said they are. I said we are not winning it.
It was obvious we weren't winning it in September of last year.
I agree.Yep, I agree.
We have nothing to suggest that we are good enough to win any leagues any time soon.
The City/Huddersfield match just now proved the difference between us and City.
Huddersfield made both matches scrappy for the bigger team, but where City dominated possession and chances, Huddersfield did that to us.
City managed to outplay them. We didn't. City deservedly won. We deservedly lost that game.
We need to bridge this vital gap in terms of general performance.
Yeah.I agree.
I'm not saying we won't get there. We just need much more work.
Because the bald cnut inherited a better situation than mourinhoYeah.
The point is, though, why is it that we should need tons more work to get to challenging City?
Mourinho and Pep have had the same amount of times at their respective clubs. They have spent roughly the same money.
If we don't give them amy actual challenge next season then the board would ultimately have failed again (assuming they want the team to win the league).
By the time we play city, we will most likely be even more than 8 points behind them. Watford will be tough and I cannot see us beating Arsenal in Arsenal.
Because City were ahead of us when he joined them. And had has been signing players to fit that style of play.Yeah.
The point is, though, why is it that we should need tons more work to get to challenging City?
Mourinho and Pep have had the same amount of times at their respective clubs. They have spent roughly the same money.
If we don't give them amy actual challenge next season then the board would ultimately have failed again (assuming they want the team to win the league).
Because City were ahead of us when he joined them. And had has been signing players to fit that style of play.
In the 4 years post Sir Alex, they had finished ahead of us every single season. Even in the season before, they stopped trying in January after Pep was announced as manager and still finished ahead of us.
We on the other hand had hired a manager that spent a fortune on certain types of players to play a passing game. Then when that failed, we hired someone completely different to start again.
To completely ignore that is not fair. Pep inherited players like De Bruyne, Aguero and Silva. We don't have that kind of quality yet.
Have you been living under a rock for the last 4 years?
In that 4 years we have not finished ahead of Arsenal or City even once so I don't get the arrogance.
Because the bald cnut inherited a better situation than mourinho
Yeah, he probably is. But to be fair, Jose is probably 2nd best in the world IMO.He's also a better manager at this point in their careers too - best in the world actually. For some reason we don't mind talking shit about our players, and undermining them at every given opportunity compared to rivals but the same standards don't seem to hold for the manager in charge.
I think this point is that while Pep and Mou have been at their respective clubs for the same amount of time, Pep has had much more time to lay groundwork before his arrival, as they've been preparing for it for a while. United on the other hand went through a complete shift when LVG came in, and then another when he left. So while the squads maybe weren't that far apart at the end of 2015-16 (separated only by goal difference, we picked up 4 points against them in the league, we won a cup and they didn't) when the new managers came in that summer, you had a guy who specialises in working with bananas being given a load of bananas that were bought with him in mind, whereas a guy who specialises in oranges was given a load of apples someone else bought.
City need 53 from 25 to get there. In other words, 18 wins and 7 losses would be 91 points - very achievable.Season 13/14 when City won it with 86 pts they had just 25 pts after 13 games vs 37 now. That is they won 61 pts from the last 25 games. If we repeat their run, we'll end up on 90 pts. The league was weaker then though. Liverpool nearly won it without being able to defend well.
Not a big shame to lose to Huddersfield though. They almost stopped both you and City.We have no-one to blame but ourselves for the 8 point gap. I said it before and I'll say it again. Drawing at Stoke and losing against Huddersfield is why we find ourselves behind City.
Fair play to City. This is the best opening 13 game run in the history of the Premier League. Better than any previous great team has ever managed. That's nothing to be sniffed at.
For our part, United have 29 points and are doing brilliantly as well. That's better than we managed in 08/09 and during the Treble season. Mourinho's team is very, very good. But City are currently better. I don't think we should beat ourselves up over it too much. Obviously, we need to strive to match them, but no other team has ever done that either.
I can't argue against any of that.Because City were ahead of us when he joined them. And had has been signing players to fit that style of play.
In the 4 years post Sir Alex, they had finished ahead of us every single season. Even in the season before, they stopped trying in January after Pep was announced as manager and still finished ahead of us.
We on the other hand had hired a manager that spent a fortune on certain types of players to play a passing game. Then when that failed, we hired someone completely different to start again.
To completely ignore that is not fair. Pep inherited players like De Bruyne, Aguero and Silva. We don't have that kind of quality yet.
He is a cnut, isn't he. And he is most certainly bald.Because the bald cnut inherited a better situation than mourinho
He is a cnut, isn't he. And he is most certainly bald.
And yes, Guardiola did inherit a better situation.
My arguement is that the gap seems, in the first few hours after yet another City win, wider than when both managers took over their respective teams.
The latter aren't given half the defensive responsibility.
Please think before you start slagging off our players.
Erm, they started exactly the same time. Actually Mourinho was sitting on his arse for 6 months after getting sacked by Chelsea, so he technically had the head start while Guardiola still had to take his Bayern to the Semi Finals of the CL.
What stupid defensive responsibility? Are you spiritually blind? Which of them beat their marker yesterday? We were playing Brighton, not Madrid or PSG - and our so called wide players always preferred to receive ball to feet in front of their markers.
Sane/Sterling don’t necessarily dribble their markers. They have perfected the passing triangle to get any obstacle out of the way, something our own players should be doing. Open your eyes and see the difference instead of hiding behind “defensive responsibility”.
I liked it.... there should be more food-based analogies on the Caf.I think this point is that while Pep and Mou have been at their respective clubs for the same amount of time, Pep has had much more time to lay groundwork before his arrival, as they've been preparing for it for a while. United on the other hand went through a complete shift when LVG came in, and then another when he left. So while the squads maybe weren't that far apart at the end of 2015-16 (separated only by goal difference, we picked up 4 points against them in the league, we won a cup and they didn't) when the new managers came in that summer, you had a guy who specialises in working with bananas being given a load of bananas that were bought with him in mind, whereas a guy who specialises in oranges was given a load of apples someone else bought.
Sorry for the fruit analogy, I'm eating an apple.
Sounds familiar, doesn't it?
Sounds familiar, doesn't it?
The problem was that we lost to Spurs, drew with Sunderland, City, and Burnley in about 8 matches. Our form hit a snag after January and basically Hazard/Ivanovic carried us to the title after Oscar, Cesc, and Costa disapeared.
Sounds familiar, doesn't it?