Can we get RS for a lifetime achievement 2015 award, as he is a bit of a ledge and and actual top lad?
#VoteRedSky
<3 But yeah won't happen. I think the most votes I've ever had in one of these things is like 3 and that was when I went through my war against pogue.
fwiw, I already miss you in here. *sniff* I remember that beautiful day when we plotted to steal Cavani and Falcao off Stoke. Those were the glory years.
Your welcome
Alacacer is a young 90 rated striker. Ntcham is 80 rated and hasn't started for a while so I'll cancel the deal. I don't care and can't be bothered if you all decide to have a pissy fit.
There is no morales in this league. It's all cloak and daggers and people shitting on others.
What am I missing?
Your welcome
I thought someone would want to take over them after the thingymabob got sorted out. I don't get why nobody at all is interested in them. Good stadium and some nice players.What was the point in banning us from doing deals with West ham, when there is no one there to take over.
I didn't really go on SM much yesterday and didn't really see this thread bumped either (was mainly dealing with award thread and playing GTA to keep my mind occupied) but I agree about selling players for base price. With Mina I paid max.Why do the player ratings matter? If it isn't fair for a 90 rated player, it isn't fair for a 75 rated one either. Considering the amount of flak big Andy and MJJ got for the alcacer deal, why wouldn't people point out the same here?
I'm genuinely confused by the last bit. Are you justifying your deal saying people have no morals so it's fine for you to do the deal? Or are you saying the deal was absolutely fair and you're being unfairly pulled up because people just want to "shit on others"?
Fwiw, If people want to go the old way where it's every man for himself with 80 man squads, looting unmanaged clubs, etc, I will be fine to go along with it. It benefits the big clubs anyways. But if we take the fair route, it's gotta be the same for everyone.
Really odd how no one but gs commented on the deal considering the amount of shit that got flung during the alcacer case.
Caf AwardWhat am I missing?
I didn't really go on SM much yesterday and didn't really see this thread bumped either (was mainly dealing with award thread and playing GTA to keep my mind occupied) but I agree about selling players for base price. With Mina I paid max.
I thought RS told Sean about Ntcham in the first place but looking back via search I guess he didn't.
Doesn't look like he's played much for Genoa of late. Is he that good?
Why do the player ratings matter? If it isn't fair for a 90 rated player, it isn't fair for a 75 rated one either. Considering the amount of flak big Andy and MJJ got for the alcacer deal, why wouldn't people point out the same here?
I'm genuinely confused by the last bit. Are you justifying your deal saying people have no morals so it's fine for you to do the deal? Or are you saying the deal was absolutely fair and you're being unfairly pulled up because people just want to "shit on others"?
Fwiw, If people want to go the old way where it's every man for himself with 80 man squads, looting unmanaged clubs, etc, I will be fine to go along with it. It benefits the big clubs anyways. But if we take the fair route, it's gotta be the same for everyone.
Really odd how no one but gs commented on the deal considering the amount of shit that got flung during the alcacer case.
Its shit the way the rules keep changing on the fly to suit the needs of a few.
Why do the player ratings matter? If it isn't fair for a 90 rated player, it isn't fair for a 75 rated one either. Considering the amount of flak big Andy and MJJ got for the alcacer deal, why wouldn't people point out the same here?
I'm genuinely confused by the last bit. Are you justifying your deal saying people have no morals so it's fine for you to do the deal? Or are you saying the deal was absolutely fair and you're being unfairly pulled up because people just want to "shit on others"?
Fwiw, If people want to go the old way where it's every man for himself with 80 man squads, looting unmanaged clubs, etc, I will be fine to go along with it. It benefits the big clubs anyways. But if we take the fair route, it's gotta be the same for everyone.
Really odd how no one but gs commented on the deal considering the amount of shit that got flung during the alcacer case.
I thought RS told Sean about Ntcham in the first place but looking back via search I guess he didn't.
Doesn't look like he's played much for Genoa of late. Is he that good?
I know that feel. Same was said about FofanaWhich is why i'm perfectly happy cancelling the deal. He was being touted as a Yaya/Pogba replacement in September but has been dropped since.
Struggling to see how you can't figure out the difference between a 21 year old 90 rated player and a 19 year old 80 rated. Andy got so much stick because he was moving to a different club and selling his best player and one of the best youngsters in the game. Sean was leaving the game and selling a young kid with potential who's barely played any football in the last month and a half. The cases are extremely different, the only similarity is it was a player being sold before a manager was leaving.
There have been plenty of dodgy deals that have happened and people don't give a shit. Normally they involve MJJ so him moaning is fecking hilarious frankly. Anyway I cancelled the deal ages ago. So feck off,
Where have I moaned? I havent said one word about the deal but your hypocrisy and defensiveness is "fecking hilarious"
Its shit the way the rules keep changing on the fly to suit the needs of a few.
Feel free to point out my hypocrisy and i'll point out the errors in your thinking and we'll have a big man hug at the end and shit on SM HQ's.
Yeah am planning to quit when that happens again![]()
That post was about not being able to buy from unmanaged clubs, not your ntcham deal. I quoted it after you cancelled it since it is apt. The hypocrisy is the same one we argued about before, when you loaned that kid to someone with a buy back/first refusal clause(cant rememebr the name). The player rating shouldn't matter and how everyone first tried to sign paco then cried about big andy leaving the club and selling him once they knew they cant buy him.
Feck me, what's the point it continuing now then?It seems as if many of you are on your way out. It will hardly be worth continuing soon if this leaving trend continues.
Thing is MJJ, Buy Back and First Refusal are very different. First Refusal is a fairer option as it allows any club to have a chance to sign the player. Buyback gives no other club a chance of buying the player.
Buyback: Should the original selling club bid a set amount the buy back is triggered. The figure doesn't change.
First Refusal: Should the player have a bid, the selling club must match the bid to trigger the buy back.
You used Buyback, I used First Refusal. I used first refusal on a 75 rated youngster, you used buyback on one of the best young players in the game.
Buyback:
- Frees up 1 player cap
- Frees up 90 rated wage (45k)
- Removes any concerns he had
- Allows you to sign 90 rated for a fixed sum
- Manager could go back on his deal and not sell you the player (that's a matter of making sure you sell to the right manager)
First Refusal:Feel free to add more if you can think of any, black = positive, red = negative. You can therefore see that the situations were different, player ratings should obviously matter because their are gameplay features like concerns/wages that are rating based and therefore you are (cleverly) getting round.
- Frees up 1 player cap
- Frees up 75 rated wage (7k)
- Someone could bid more and buy the player
Also I do see your point about everyone trying to sign Paco before leaving. But then again, everyone was maxing out the bid, so although cheeky, it was for a substantial sum of money and from memory you bid much less and bought him back. That's from memory though so could be very wrong on that. Apologies if I am. Anyway, I won't post anymore on the subject so i'll let you have the final word if you wish so.
Feck me, what's the point it continuing now then?It seems as if many of you are on your way out. It will hardly be worth continuing soon if this leaving trend continues.
We should steal their concept and readjust it to our liking. No more soccerwiki. We'll call it footymanager or redmanager.Someone needs to find the new SM for us to jump on.
Someone needs to find the new SM for us to jump on.
I'd easily get all of the features designed and thought out (it's what I do for a living).