Oh yeah, forgot about that
Messi on the bench against Atleti, fml.
Oh no, nothing about rating. Just when I do the weekly game time thing in the competition against RedSky I'll probably end up losing due to thisYou were expecting his rating to go up/down based on playing time?
Oh no, nothing about rating. Just when I do the weekly game time thing in the competition against RedSky I'll probably end up losing due to this
Not this time. Pogba's on the bench as well.You always win!!
Not this time. Pogba's on the bench as well.
Well you're obviously a mug then. I had 2 starting 89 rated players in my first team when I won the league. They're only 1 rating away from going up to 90, 88's are useful for backup squad players as shown by me using Fabinho, Willems and feck Berahino is 87 rated and i've been using him as a sub.
You're a rating snob.
A few hours and you didn't bid. You missed the window of opportunity.I currently have decent rated players for all positions but I am lacking younger players so am trying to buy but no one will sell.
£25m for Eriksen ffs. He offered to me at £26m as well and withdrew a little later.
I currently have decent rated players for all positions but I am lacking younger players so am trying to buy but no one will sell.
£25m for Eriksen ffs. He offered to me at £26m as well and withdrew a little later.
A few hours and you didn't bid. You missed the window of opportunity.
Well yes, no one will sell highly rated young players for obvious reasons! You have to pick them up at 85-87 rated and get them rising in your own squad.
He has youngsters rated much highger and with much better potential. Losing Eriksen will make NO difference fro him. Absolutely none. He is the player with the least potential and probably the one who will keep the lowest rating out of all his squad. That's why I picked him!
He's keeping him because he has an extremely solid squad, youngsters with fantastic potential and gets enough money every match to not care for it.
HOG!
No, no. I hog players.He's made 27 appearances for Damien though (in matches that reduce fitness). So it would make a difference wouldn't it?
He's made 27 appearances for Damien though (in matches that reduce fitness). So it would make a difference wouldn't it?
He's made 27 appearances for Damien though (in matches that reduce fitness). So it would make a difference wouldn't it?
It's because he hadn't bought Ozil or Vidal. He also bought Son!
As already been proven there were plenty of young players 85+ available. You just didn't bother to buy them.
Look at Herrera and Green Smiley who managed to shoot up the youth table by buying the right young players. A new season began and you didn't contest for any of the risers, it's your own fault.
feck off, do some scouting there is plenty of websites to help you and stop complaining.It's because he hadn't bought Ozil or Vidal. He also bought Son!
He'll be reduced to even less but anyways.
Also just had a search out of curiosity more, as I am checking almost daily anyway, for young players 85+ and 98% are taken while the rest have no potential.
The GW is oversaturated and around 10 of the teams have not only got the best players but also the best talent. A lowering of the FFP cap by 5 would make 50 or so of those available to the other 30 teams with everyone having a chance to get someone. 5 players less won't make a difference to a team of 45 nor would it to a team of 50 but a massive difference for everyone else.
Obviously it is in your interest to want to keep your players and there's nothing we can do but people will eventually get bored of watching a bunch of you trade the best players and buy the best youngsters and leave you to yourselves again and I'm sure you won't mind tha but then why allow people to join at all.
Yea of course ignore all the other points and reply by telling me that your squads deadwood was available to buy. Tell me by how many will Knoche rise this season? Or even better how many games is he going to actually play? You know that very well considering you sold him.
Sometimes I don't know why I bother tbh. You're all as selfish as each other and of course you'd have each other's back as its in all your interests.
do you want your cap reduced to 40Barring MJJ, right?
do you want your cap reduced to 40
Thats what LB is on about, it was never really going to distribute the current talent it was only ever going to effect the scouting talent and LB is giving out because he doesn't scout and doesn't see the point in scouting players and waiting years for them to grow.Hell to the No!
But I do see his point of better distribution of the talent through out the league, although the new rules are supposed to be doing just that.
feck off, do some scouting there is plenty of websites to help you and stop complaining.
Thats what LB is on about, it was never really going to distribute the current talent it was only ever going to effect the scouting talent and LB is giving out because he doesn't scout and doesn't see the point in scouting players and waiting years for them to grow.
Hell to the No!
But I do see his point of better distribution of the talent through out the league, although the new rules are supposed to be doing just that.
I wish i bought Durm after looking at Redskys list, really light at left back.
@RedSky the one thing Lb has going against him is there is a lot of us quicker at finding talent than him
1st - Manchester United (8.95)
2nd - Manchester City (8.37)
3rd - Nottingham Forest (8.13)
4th - Arsenal (7.91)
5th - Newcastle United (7.56)
6th - Tottenham Hotspur (7.29)
7th - Everton (7.23)
8th - Liverpool (7.14)
9th - Fulham (7.03)
10th - Sunderland (7.00)
11th - Aston Villa (6.81)
12th - Darlington 1883 (6.78)
13th - Chelsea (6.47)
14th - Bury (6.00)
15th - Blackburn Rovers (5.94)
16th - Ipswich Town (5.64)
17th - Wolverhampton Wanderers (5.55)
18th - Reading (5.50)
18th - AFC Bournemouth (5.50)
20th - Bristol City (5.33)
21st - Milton Keynes Dons (5.27)
22nd - Crystal Palace (5.21)
22nd - Queens Park Rangers (5.21)
24th - Bolton Wanderers (5.15)
25th - Southampton (5.05)
26th - Sheffield United (5.00)
27th - Plymouth Argyle (4.57)
28th - Norwich City (4.56)
29th - Blackpool (4.50)
29th - Leicester City (4.50)
31st - West Ham United (4.42)
32nd - Stoke City (4.27)
33rd - Sheffield Wednesday (4.25)
34th - Watford (4.17)
35th - Cardiff City (4.00)
36th - Middlesbrough (3.90)
37th - Hull City (3.83)
38th - Birmingham City (3.63)
39th - Derby County (3.39)
40th - Swansea City (2.50)
41st - Leeds United (2.43)
42nd - West Bromwich Albion (0.00)
42nd - Southend United (0.00)
42nd - Notts County (0.00)
42nd - Kidderminster Harriers (0.00)
42nd - Barnsley (0.00)