Deleted member 101472
Guest
@Enigma_87 in what world is carlos alberto better defensively than dani alves? Would love to see some proof of this.
I really like @Arbitrium's defence and midfield. Also agree that the players around Messi aren't optimal for him to shine, he's never really impressed me when taken out of the Barcelona system. I think Robben is too selfish for it to work as a front 3.
However, he really does lack up front for an all-time draft, and not sure whether he'd get many goals. It's a tough one.
He was center back for his club side in many games mate he’s to me certainly better than Alves in defensive sense.@Enigma_87 in what world is carlos alberto better defensively than dani alves? Would love to see some proof of this.
It’s a standard practice mate or I really don’t understand what’s the issue?@Enigma_87 @The Red Viper why would both of you vote? bit of a snide move
He was center back for his club side in many games mate he’s to me certainly better than Alves in defensive sense.
It’s a standard practice mate or I really don’t understand what’s the issue?
He was excellent tackler and was always considered as one of the most complete full backs of all time. Dani Alves is good defensively but as @Gio said it's pretty much non contest if you compare them in a back 4. Regardless of whether it is back 4 or back 5, when you face Robben and Ronaldinho and Facchetti and Carlos Alberto, both Carlos and Alves would be tested, and whilst you Kempes who can peel left, your full backs are the main source of width in your team, whilst we have much more variety in attack in that sense.At the end of his career IIRC?
Not sure if I understand mate. Manager votes doesn't count either way so they are pretty much voided. TRV hasn't participated in the discussion yet and he's limited to 3 posts of the course of the whole game.Well it should be much more of a standard practice that when one team has a manager and an assistant, and the other only has a manager, that one person on the team with two abstains. Surely thats common sense?
He was excellent tackler and was always considered as one of the most complete full backs of all time. Dani Alves is good defensively but as @Gio said it's pretty much non contest if you compare them in a back 4. Regardless of whether it is back 4 or back 5, when you face Robben and Ronaldinho and Facchetti and Carlos Alberto, both Carlos and Alves would be tested, and whilst you Kempes who can peel left, your full backs are the main source of width in your team, whilst we have much more variety in attack in that sense.
Honestly, what is the point of Arjen Robben in this game. He never really played with a strong overlapping full back (which Carlos Alberto undoubtedly is) and he never played without movement ahead of him (which he wont get because Messi and ronaldinho are both going to drop and look for the ball)
Great player but he'll be lost in this game, completely.
Not sure if I understand mate. Manager votes doesn't count either way so they are pretty much voided. TRV hasn't participated in the discussion yet and he's limited to 3 posts of the course of the whole game.
In which case i have considerably more through the middle, where i can actually do damage. theres really not that much point in your full backs offering width or getting to the byline. No-one in the box and 3 of the greatest defenders of all time snuffing out anything that comes their way anyway. Contrast that with masopust, breitner, schiaffino, Kempes and Crespo all offering significant goal threat through the middle.
Given the width of my full backs and the freedom they will have at times ( I think this is true for both sides) another thing you have to take into consideration which can often be what determines the outcome of such a close game is the amount of balls that go into the box and the movement within.
Crespo and Kempes movement are both elite. As is both their heading ability (Crespo more so). The defenders on team enigma/trv are good in the air but good enough to win every ball coming in from Carlos and Alves, both who have excellent distribution?
Contrast that with The front 3 of Enigma/trv. None of the front 3 ever demonstrate much movement inside the box as they all prefer to have the ball outside of it. And there is much more chance of me getting the call to play up front for United against Bournemouth tomorrow than there is of anyone on His team scoring a header against those defenders. Not that they'll have to face a cross the whole game anyway, thus rendering the crossing abilities of Facchetti and Carlos Alberto redundant.
I hope that voters can see past the fancy names here, because in my honest opinion
If you want to get the best out of Robben in this game then you cannot get the best out of Messi or Robben
If you want to get the best out of Ronaldinho in this game then you cannot get the best out of Messi or Robben
If you want to get the best ouf of Messi in this game then you cannot get the best out of Ronaldinho or Robben.
The front 3 wouldnt function well at all.
Honestly, what is the point of Arjen Robben in this game. He never really played with a strong overlapping full back (which Carlos Alberto undoubtedly is) and he never played without movement ahead of him (which he wont get because Messi and ronaldinho are both going to drop and look for the ball)
Great player but he'll be lost in this game, completely.
Cheers mate. Yeah Redondo was physical and as you mentioned Sammer would really bring a lot of dynamism in that defence/midfield and transitioning through the lines.I absolutely agree about him being underrated here in terms of defensive influence. Even all-around ability. Immense player.
Just feel it's not a perfect combo, Redondo will play quick one, two, no problem. He also likes to organize the game from the deep and I feel like you have two alphas colliding in some way. Btw. Redondo was extremely physical, even aggressive, his main issue was (deceptive) lack of pace. In that sense, I can see them working very good in the defensive phase. Have some clear doubts about that pair in attack though.
Great team btw. Have to give you benefit of doubt here as besides having a brilliant attacking three, you're rock solid behind also.
thats twice youve done it now, we are talking about players playing at their peak which means false 9 Messi and peak ronaldinho, which literally never happened once. as already mentioned but incase anyone missed it, when Guardiola decided to make Messi into a false 9, he dispensed with ronaldinho. and you mention carlos albertos centre back skills which he developed past his peak. play fair
The way I see it there are two types of la pausa, or two ways of doing la pausa: with the ball travelling fast or with the ball going slowly. Waiting for a team-mate by holding the ball is the typical explanation of la pausa. The first one, the pause in speed, is a total revelation, nobody knows about it [he emitted a brief and slightly unnerving chuckle] and nobody has done it. Sometimes you have to go fast, carrying the ball with you, to wait for another player to come into position. - Ricardo Bochini, 2014
The only eyesore to me is Ferrara as an LCB. No biggie as you largely want him as a stopper, but still not the best positioning for Ferrara.
Mate, that's your opinion on the matter and not something I really agree with. Both Ronnie and Messi worked pretty well with each other. Their peaks didn't overlap but by no means that doesn't give any indication they won't be great in the same team (both peaks).
Ronnie's star shined brightly but not long enough for all of us to enjoy it even more.of course it does. are you telling me that 28 year old ronaldinho was past it and thats why Guardiola got rid of him? or was it more a case of the best coach of his generation- who pioneered the system to get the best ouf of Messi- decided that he simply wouldnt be able to fulfil the requirments?
aye we want him as a stopper in this game Don't think it's really an issue either way as Arbitrium's right flank only consists of Dani Alves.
The thing is Messi at false 9 needed wide forwards who would cut in or stretch the play and offer brilliant movement going forward. Robben is one of the best at it.I agree with arbitrium that Robben could struggle and that both Messi and him could be frustrated with their relationship on the pitch, on the other hand i dont see an issue between Messi and Dinho, yes its not th greatest fit tactically but i can see them working well and both be on top of their game, there is just to much respect between them for partnership not to work.
edit: and Pep sold Dinho not because of Messi but because he was past his peak.
The thing is Messi at false 9 needed wide forwards who would cut in or stretch the play and offer brilliant movement going forward. Robben is one of the best at it.
Messi dropping in the hole and finding Robben behind the line is one hell of a route to goal and IMO they all would work like a treat. Especially all of them being really brilliant individuals and offering different things to the table on top of having a lot of space to work between them.
Ronnie's star shined brightly but not long enough for all of us to enjoy it even more.
The biggest break in him came after that loss in the 06 WC. And he has said it himself. It's not something to do with Messi. At all.
I think you are getting desperate here mate. I'm sure you won't find many to agree with you that Ronaldinho was sold because of Messi. He was sold because he was past it.yes but you know what Guardiola is like as a coach. Almost every current/former player of his who speaks about him says that he makes them better. He didnt even try with ronaldinho.
The point stands mate and i know you have to argue for your team but that front 3 doesnt work together if you are using the false 9 version of Messi from 08-11. I'd be much more concerned with Villa and Pedro there to be honest, proper width and movement in behind and both willing to put a shift in for the team. Ronaldinho and robben wont do that. Remember that Messi success was a byproduct of Barcelona's success as a team who pressed from the front, very aggressively and had three midfielders doing the same, all buying in. you just don't have the conditions to expect this unit to perform as well as it appears it might at first glance.
The thing is Messi at false 9 needed wide forwards who would cut in or stretch the play and offer brilliant movement going forward. Robben is one of the best at it.
Messi dropping in the hole and finding Robben behind the line is one hell of a route to goal and IMO they all would work like a treat. Especially all of them being really brilliant individuals and offering different things to the table on top of having a lot of space to work between them.
"only" dani alves. Just a guy who literally can control a game from right back when at his best and with no-one tracking him at all as redondo and vieira are most definitely trying to contend with their midfield counterparts. So on the contrary, I think an out of position ferrara will be seeing Mr Alves regularly, and when he's not he'll be trying to contain the movement of Crespo which as we've already seen, he can struggle with. In case you missed it (honestly worth it for the commentary alone)
It is what it is tho. Your only source of width on the right is Dani Alves in attack. And this is before we discuss the space he'll leave for Facchetti and Ronaldinho to exploit when we get back the ball. Facchetti is greater goalscoring threat in terms of pure goals as well. Even playing in a much more defensive side in Inter.
So on the contrary, I think an out of position ferrara will be seeing Mr Alves regularly
Tight game, ultimately it's about organisation vs. individual brilliance.
Enigma/TRV have more individual genius upfront, but the word individual is key when facing a superb defensive trio organised by arguably the best defensive line leader of all time.
Conversely, Arbitrium has a clear and sublime attacking orchestrator with players bound to submit to playing their respective roles rather than go solo... against a defence with great personnel but less likely to operate effectively as a collective unit as the other.
One is sexier, the other is more likely to manage and control the game.
The key could be in how the midfields stack up, which is hard to tell with the stylistic differences. It's easy to figure and value how Redondo-Vieira would operate with Sammer pushing up (mind, if/once beaten Ferrara/Puyol are up shit creek) while Masopust-Breitner- Schiaffino is harder to visualise.
Their standing in the game is superior, all three shone brightly on the biggest stage, all three were key to midfields featuring in WC finals... but still can't decidedly make a call for one or the other.