croadyman
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 38,926
The meltdown in here ffs
Didn't help people like that Alicelovesfootball channel putting out a thumbnail which made it sound like a catastrophe
The meltdown in here ffs
I see the moaners are out in full force again
We need cover, options are limited, makes sense.
But don't let that get in the way of a good whinge.
We have one natural right winger fit, we have another whom is seemingly in the dog house.No it doesn't. Signing a body just because he plays the correct position is a terrible way to go about business. It's how you end up with Wout Weghorst starting every game.
Also we literally have 2 fit RW options and 4 others that can cover there currently. And that's not counting Antony or Amad who is injured.
I'm sure his name came up during Solskjærs reign. He would be a good fit here and won't cost too much. 18 years, Ronaldo fan, can play on both sides, aggressive, good pace and control. Just decking do it.I hope they keep an eye out for Nusa
People laughed at this rumors yet it was brought by the first tier source. You people might wonder if the club saw the negative backlash from the fans and reneged the decision, it wont be the first time they did it either.
Source which did not confirm Uniteds interestPeople laughed at this rumors yet it was brought by the first tier source. You people might wonder if the club saw the negative backlash from the fans and reneged the decision, it wont be the first time they did it either.
Not another overrated BVB RW pleaseCould this guy be the answer?
Might even be available for as low as €60m.
Just left-wing? I think we need an LW, RW, CDM, and a CB to be competitive, assuming Hojlund is any good. Otherwise, we need a FW as well. And that along with the change of the manager, now that Glazers aren't going away.Right winger? Think we need a left winger as well
Neto.
I've been on his hype train for ages. Time to buy him.
Which is bad because we’re stacked for left wingers, they’re just all shocking or not ready yet. Garnacho should be it in a few years time. As for the right wing, as long as we still have ETH then he ain’t giving up on a 90m winger that’s one of his favourites.Right winger? Think we need a left winger as well
Probably because we didn’t play with a right winger..: played more of a diamond with 2 up top.Our right side was completely invisible today. Totally neglected.
Probably because we didn’t play with a right winger..: played more of a diamond with 2 up top.
Left footed.Plays on the left, no?
Left footed.
Left footed.
Aren't about eight of them currently not playing for us?!Still plays on the left for Wolves - also isnt he quite good with both feet?
I do rate him too, but we dont want 3 players that mainly plays on the left
Aren't about eight of them currently not playing for us?!
None have pace. He has pace. Imagine trying to play transition football with no quick players.
Ye because Rashford who can play ST but loves to drift to the left so he can shoot which is what he kept doing.So we played with two up top but attacked exclusively down the left? As I said, our right side was invisible.
Ye because Rashford who can play ST but loves to drift to the left so he can shoot which is what he kept doing.
It doesn't make any sense. The club's mantra is youth, courage, success but the manager chooses to play McTominay ahead of Pellistri at home to Brighton. We want our young attackers to be brave and take chances but how do you instill that belief in them when the manager himself is too afraid to give them the opportunity? It's so backwards.Hoping Amad can return soon and impress! He definitely has that little extra. Pellistri should have been given a chance against Brighton.
I just hate it when we have players that play in a natural position, and because of fear you start with players like McTominay instead who offer absolutely nothing, and has proven that over years. We have options - time to use them.
It doesn't make any sense. The club's mantra is youth, courage, success but the manager chooses to play McTominay ahead of Pellistri at home to Brighton. We want our young attackers to be brave and take chances but how do you instill that belief in them when the manager himself is too afraid to give them the opportunity? It's so backwards.
It makes absolutely no sense. "Fear leads to the dark side" to paraphrase Yoda.
I can understand playing away against Arsenal, City, Bayern etc that you approach the game with caution. However, at home playing in front of your supporters, you go for it. You give chance to youth because that's been a mantra for this club, as you say, and the manager has said he trusts Pellistri, but then he doesn't play him.
It truly boggles my mind, and it makes us much worse.
I wonder how Pedro Neto will recover from his injury. He looked very good at one point.
I think we have enough players we could and should give a go before we buy more. Bruno or Mount, Sancho with one last chance. Amad, Pelestri maybe Garnacho?
Some are a bit of a stretch. It just wouldn't be my first priority if the window was open today.
Maybe Pellistri isn't the same level of talent as Mainoo or Garnacho but there is something there. It would've be nice if he was given the opportunity to showcase what he can or can't do when there was no other viable alternative in his position last game.You give a chance to talented youth, if you have the talent you play. The issue I have with Pellistri is I don't think he has the talent or else as with seen with Garnacho and even Mainoo Ten Hag would play him.
It's not because fast players beat you to the ball. It doesn't go into the net on it's own.We need to start letting the ball do the running for us rather than relying on a sprint team. A little bit harder to do, but far more effective.