There's definitely been a significant improvement in the English lot, but the talk of five teams potentially going through was always a bit silly. It's easy to forget how good Barca are right now and Chelsea managing to sneak a first round draw against them was partly a surprise in itself.
You're judging the barcelona-chelsea/juve-spurs ties by the standard of play of the games and the sevilla-united tie by the on paper prediction. Sevilla outplayed united and fully deserved to go through, they were clearly the better team over 180 minutesExcept that they probably should have won that first leg, and on another day with another goalkeeper should have pushed Barcelona much closer today. Tottenham should have beaten Juventus given the overall balance of the tie, hard to argue we shouldn't have beaten Sevilla also. Then it could quite easily have been at least 50% of quarter finalists English teams.
Except of course with regards to these *shoulds* English clubs are 0/3. Concentration and mental resilience appalling.
Liverpool and City are yet to really be tested. I imagine Liverpool will be exposed at the back by any of the teams left. As for City, I'd think they might just be the favorites to be honest.
You're judging the barcelona-chelsea/juve-spurs ties by the standard of play of the games and the sevilla-united tie by the on paper prediction. Sevilla outplayed united and fully deserved to go through, they were clearly the better team over 180 minutes
That Bilbao side that smacked us about in 11/12 finished 10th in La Liga that season too, and they made us look foolish over 2 legs. They were turned over by Atletico in the final. Just imagine what Atletico could have done to us.
Not sure how much you can judge from last night.
We were unbelevably poor, Sevilla are unbelievably average. Bare in mind Sevilla are La Liga's equivalents of our Chelsea.
And we'll be able to tell more from Chelsea-Barcelona tonight.
Sure! Doesn't change my pointThat was due to United performing really poorly though. Sevilla looked pretty limited to me and a way off the quality of the best teams left in the competition.
Sevilla are more Everton standard, usually in the europa league.
Last few years they've lost Bacca, Rakitic, Krychowiak, Banega (for a season) and Kevin Gamiero. Yet their level is still regular european participation.
West Ham lose Payet and cry about it for half a season. We lose Milner and Young when we were top 6 regulars, replace them with Ireland and N'zogbia and wonder why we're fighting relegation every season.
Spanish teams better constructing balanced 11s on competitive budgets, can effectively replace key players in the system (see Atletico Madrid succesfully replacing all the main strikers they've sold in last 10 years) and that helps maintain consistancy.
So it turns out only two English teams managed to go through the first knockout round and both had it quite easy given the quality of opposition they faced.
Every English team that played against a half decent opposition got knocked out.
You sort of forgot United within this formula.
In recent head to heads - yes, La Liga looks stronger.
However, in every major tournament (World Cup, European and even Copa America) for the last 2 decades, the premier league has had much stronger representation than any other league.
If that isn’t a strong indicator of “relative strength” I don’t know what the feck is.
Our opposition was fairly decent. Not great but decent and better than Porto and Basel.
I think it's the time we need to start claiming that European results do not matter because English clubs are too tired from their local competition to perform well in Europe.
Well we'll see who's laughing at the end of the season when a Premier League club wins the Champions League.
Anti-English vibes i get from the likes of you is one of the reasons i want all English clubs to do well in Europe.
Your point seems meaningless all things considered. Spurs won a group with Real and Dortmund and Chelsea saw off A Madrid in the group stages. England had the most sides in the last 16 by 2. Spain have 3 left now, Italy 2 and England 2.
If you had watched a lot of the games I’m not sure how you can deduce any solid conclusions on relative league strength. All that remains to be seen in the last three stages.
Dortmund have been average at best this season and are about to get knocked out from Europe by Salzburg. Not sure if there are any real conclusions to be gathered from that victory.
England had the most sides by 2 partly because they were the only country that had 5 teams in the first place.
Chelsea knocking out Atletico was an achievement and a huge surprise admittedly.
I wouldn't say it it was an achievement or a huge surprise the English champions bettering Spain's 3rd best team, Chelsea have x10 a higher transfer budget than Atletico per season, so should be getting the better of Atletico when they come up against them.
By rights the Premier League should have had 4 English teams in the quarter finals, Spurs going out was a shock and let's face it they didn't deserve to go out, Seville deservedly knocked Manchester United out, but they aren't stronger or a better side than Manchester United.
I never had any faith in Manchester United anyway though, if you look back in this thread i called United the weakest of all the English clubs in the Champions League and the least capable English team knocking out another European giant over 2 legs a few weeks back.
Other than Manchester United, there's certainly progress from the English teams anyway and i can see City winning the whole thing this season.
Dortmund have been average at best this season and are about to get knocked out from Europe by Salzburg. Not sure if there are any real conclusions to be gathered from that victory.
England had the most sides by 2 partly because they were the only country that had 5 teams in the first place.
Chelsea knocking out Atletico was an achievement and a huge surprise admittedly.
England had 5 teams as one of their non top 4 sides won the Europa League, that is indicative of strength in the league. All those 5 teams then had to qualify for the knockouts. It is indicative of a strength in depth no matter how you try to spin it.
Well the fact that after the first knockout round only 2 out of 5 are left while all 3 Spanish teams made it through, including a team that is not even a top La Liga side, is also indicative of strength of both leagues.
Well the fact that after the first knockout round only 2 out of 5 are left while all 3 Spanish teams made it through, including a team that is not even a top La Liga side, is also indicative of strength of both leagues.
The Spanish League is strong but their performance overall has declined somewhat whereas England has improve quite a lot this year. A couple of years ago Spain were completely dominating both the CL and EL.
United's result was more a reflection of us shitting the bed than the strength of the league. I'd say any other club from the top 6 (even Arsenal) would have gone past Sevilla - we were that bad. And apart from United's result, all the other ones panned out as you'd expect.
Well the same Sevilla team also held Liverpool twice in the groups, though the games were completely different. I don't know how other teams would have done against them, the entire forum (me included) was convinced they had very little chance against United too and see how it turned out.
I will bet almost anything that Sevilla do not make it to the semis. Even Roma will dispose of the easily. We really showed them way too much respect. Spartak Moscow scored 5 against them. And it was not even the only time they conceded 5 this season.
I will bet almost anything that Sevilla do not make it to the semis. Even Roma will dispose of the easily. We really showed them way too much respect. Spartak Moscow scored 5 against them. And it was not even the only time they conceded 5 this season.
I think Sevilla are by far the weakest team left in the competition. They really aren't very good and even domestically they lag some distance behind the top 4, not to mention they are awful away from home and have had their share of embarrassing results out there.
Still doesn't change the fact they were absolute miles better than us over two legs. We have not been outplayed like that in Europe for quite a while and to be fair last season the team that gave us the most trouble in EL was also a mid-table Spanish club.
It's only Atletico that has really declined though, isn't it? I don't follows Europa this year that much but I see Athletic are still in it, and 3 of them are still in CL.
What is quite a while? We finished behind PSV and Wolfsburg in CL group not that long ago.
A couple of years ago the Spanish had 4 teams in the Europa League at this stage, granted that Valencia had been dumped of the CL at the group stages, there was an all Spanish tie in the round of 16 and and all Spanish tie in the quarters. In the end Sevilla won the competition but only Villareal were knocked out by a non Spanish opponent. In the CL there were three Spanish quarter finalists, A Madrid knocked out Barca in that round. The final was an all Spanish affair.
So out of 7 Spanish sides in the knockouts of both tournaments only one was eliminated by a non Spanish opponent as both competitions were won by Spanish sides.
There has definitely been a relative decline since then in the performance of Spanish sides across the board.
I think it is likely that Spain will top the coefficient rankings again this year but England have already bettered their highest total over the past 4 years and could still better Spain but that remains to be seen.
As for next season, it all depends what happens in the transfer window. I think United, City and Liverpool will be stronger next year. What happens with Chelsea and Spurs I'm not sure. Barca and Madrid are reaching a point where they really need to get it right in the transfer market as Ronaldo and Messi reach the end of their careers. Neither Barca or Real are the ominous forces they have been in recent years anymore.
Sevilla are more Everton standard, usually in the europa league.
Last few years they've lost Bacca, Rakitic, Krychowiak, Banega (for a season) and Kevin Gamiero. Yet their level is still regular european participation.
West Ham lose Payet and cry about it for half a season. We lose Milner and Young when we were top 6 regulars, replace them with Ireland and N'zogbia and wonder why we're fighting relegation every season.
Spanish teams better constructing balanced 11s on competitive budgets, can effectively replace key players in the system (see Atletico Madrid succesfully replacing all the main strikers they've sold in last 10 years) and that helps maintain consistancy.
Liverpool and City are yet to really be tested. I imagine Liverpool will be exposed at the back by any of the teams left. As for City, I'd think they might just be the favorites to be honest.
Yes but neither of them really dominated us twice the way Sevilla did. Not even Bayern in 2014 dominated us in the same fashion.
It’s interesting how this was bumped last season multiple times to laugh at me...... but obviously the clubs have just turned around completely over summer.
Some people must really hate this thread being bumped.
I think we could beat Sevilla quite easily.
I haven’t mentioned Europe at all. I’m not that fussed about the CL just the league as a whole, but it is always good to have made predictions that end up being right.
That is just flat out wrong.