Massive Spanner
The Football Wrench
Who are all these managers exactly?Just seems odd to me that all these managers who do so well abroad do worse when they come to the Prem.
Who are all these managers exactly?Just seems odd to me that all these managers who do so well abroad do worse when they come to the Prem.
The effect of suddenly having to work with inferior players? Happened a lot in Polish league where solid managers from abroad would suddenly struggle. Think it's the only plausible explanation here.Just seems odd to me that all these managers who do so well abroad do worse when they come to the Prem.
Just seems odd to me that all these managers who do so well abroad do worse when they come to the Prem.
Such as Conte? Mourinho? Pochettino?Just seems odd to me that all these managers who do so well abroad do worse when they come to the Prem.
Why were they able to do so much better abroad? Why is it all these world class talents keep coming from abroad and then not doing as well in the premier league?
Who are them?Just seems odd to me that all these managers who do so well abroad do worse when they come to the Prem.
Because they are not British managers. Pep is trying to educate the football world, he's just as stubborn as the British are. I've always advocated that England needs to go back to its own roots. If there was a Mr. Football of England, I'd go to him and tell him to stop envying the other leagues and stop buying unsuitable players just because they did well in a shit league against third rate opponents. Go back to finding those English youths that actually take pride in playing for their home town.
Why were they able to do so much better abroad? Why is it all these world class talents keep coming from abroad and then not doing as well in the premier league?
Just seems odd to me that all these managers who do so well abroad do worse when they come to the Prem.
All Games
G F A P D PpG
ENG 48 79 59 80 20 1,67
ESP 58 107 67 112 40 1,93
FRA 40 67 55 64 12 1,60
GER 46 89 55 82 34 1,78
ITA 46 85 61 76 24 1,65
Total 238 427 297 414 130 1,74
Games vs Top5 Games vs outside Top5
G F A P D PpG G F A P D PpG
ENG 20 30 34 25 -4 1,25 28 49 25 55 24 1,96
ESP 24 40 33 41 7 1,71 34 67 34 71 33 2,09
FRA 22 26 36 22 -10 1,00 18 41 19 42 22 2,33
GER 22 32 27 32 5 1,45 24 57 28 50 29 2,08
ITA 16 25 23 23 2 1,44 30 60 38 53 22 1,77
Total 104 153 153 143 0 1,38 134 274 144 271 130 2,02
To put this into perspective. If we were to have a 38 games league, with the top teams from the top 5 league only and with teams only playing teams from the other FAs, a Spanish team would finish with 17 points more than an english team on average.
Why not? Which effects would skew this favourably towards the English sidesExcept they wouldn't, because you can't extrapolate out from occasional cup games to the rigours of a league season.
Why not? Which effects would skew this favourably towards the English sides
Why not? Which effects would skew this favourably towards the English sides
this is either true of all the top 5 leagues, or plain wrong, depending on your definition of crapThere's a host of factors that differentiate between full leagues and knockout cup competitions, not least depths of squads. The idea that you can just say Barca and Real kick ass in the CL so they'd win a league by on average 19 points is just farcical. They play in a league where the vast majority of teams are crap, try putting them up against decent teams for 38 games a year and see how they hold up.
It would be a league and a very different from anything we know. So we don't know how it would end and can't tell who would adapt the best.
There's a host of factors that differentiate between full leagues and knockout cup competitions, not least depths of squads. The idea that you can just say Barca and Real kick ass in the CL so they'd win a league by on average 19 points is just farcical. They play in a league where the vast majority of teams are crap, try putting them up against decent teams for 38 games a year and see how they hold up.
The Spanish UEFA participants (1.91 PpG) have an easier ride domestically compared to the English sides (1.70 PpG). However, they find the games vs. the top teams from other top FAs only 0.2 PpG more difficult then the Spanish league, while it is 0.45 PpG more difficult for the English teams.Code:Games vs Top5 Domestic G F A P D PpG PpG Delta ENG 20 30 34 25 -4 1,25 1.70 -0.45 ESP 24 40 33 41 7 1,71 1.91 -0.20 FRA 22 26 36 22 -10 1,00 1.99 -0.99 GER 22 32 27 32 5 1,45 1.56 -0.11 ITA 16 25 23 23 2 1,44 1.92 -0.48
The idea that ... they'd win a league by on average 17 points is just farcical.
I made no such claim, I wrote "a Spanish team would finish with 17 points more than an english team on average", which means the average points for all Spanish teams would be 17 more then the average points for all English teams. This doesn't even mean a Spanish team would win the league. Although it probably would.
Bailly is also a better talent than Umtiti
Statistics are interesting aren't they? If we simplify for instance the comparisons to just Chelsea and Barcelona head to head, then with Barca on a ppg of 1.0 and us on 1.55, we'd win a 38 game season against them by a stunning 21 points.
Because statistics are great.
well, no. The superhero is, though not because of his defendingUmtiti has been La Liga's best defender this season, bar none.
Maybe I'm just being biased but the difference between him and Masche is hugewell, no. The superhero is, though not because of his defending
but otherwise, yeah, i dunno that he's been the best, but he's been very good
The one thing about the premier league, is it is more physically demanding. So in a way, it is harder on the body. Not stronger, not exactly more difficult, but more intense. Big teams have to spend more energy per game on average in england than in the other 4 leagues.
I have to ask: do you actually watch the abroad players that you are judging?
Umtiti has been La Liga's best defender this season, bar none.
Well, it's mostly an impression, though it's supported by most players and managers. As for whether they have to, that's a good question. The english football season as a whole is certainly more grinding though, the lack of winter break, 3 games in 5 days between boxing day and new year including 2 games in 3 days, two domestic cups. Also the premier league is played at the second fastest tempo, behind only germany(and i saw actual stats for this, though i can't be arsed to look for them right now)Genuine question: are numbers for this? And if there are, are there numbers showing that the big english teams have to spend more energy?
He's been very good for villarreal as well. Still, he played in Spain, right under barcelona's nose, and they choose Umtiti. Granted, Barcelona's recent track record at signing CBs hasn't been exactly stellarSo was Otamendi 2 seasons ago i think. Yeah i do certainly, do you? Bailly has a better recovery pace , heading ability, Physical presence,Can play a high line very effectively as well.
Bailly has been top notch in united as well all season.
Still, he played in Spain, right under barcelona's nose, and they choose Umtiti
I always though Hummels would land in Barcelona But Cruel Bayern signed Title rivals and Germany's Captain. Jeez Dortmund get absolutely bullied by bayern.Granted, Barcelona's recent track record at signing CBs hasn't been exactly stellar
Umtiti is better in the air than Bailly thoughBecause United and Mourinho Chose Bailly and vice versa. We would have never signed Umtiti though. Heading ability is very important in epl, most of the football in spain is played on the ground but not in epl.
Also the premier league is played at the second fastest tempo, behind only germany
Klopp's actually the main reason the bundesliga plays at the highest tempo nowThat was not the case until Managers like Klopp Pep Pochetino LVG Koeman arrived in the EPL As they brought their philosophies with them.
Even though having no winter break sounds not helpful, I think English teams don't play more games then the Spanish teams over a full saison. The games are just spread out differently. So this is no valid argument in my view.The english football season as a whole is certainly more grinding though, the lack of winter break, 3 games in 5 days between boxing day and new year including 2 games in 3 days, two domestic cups.
Those stats would be interesting. The question still remains however: do they run more because the opposition forces them to, or for other reasons (for instance because they lack the skill to dominate in an other way)? I think we would need to cross check tempo in the league games for both FAs and tempo in the UEFA games to resolve this.Also the premier league is played at the second fastest tempo, behind only germany(and i saw actual stats for this, though i can't be arsed to look for them right now)
Leicester will be playing Atletico in Champions League. England champions against a team who is not even close to title in La Liga for the past couple of seasons. Will be interesting... Anything but Leicester win will be huge disappointment for English football.
I always though Hummels would land in Barcelona But Cruel Bayern signed Title rivals and Germany's Captain. Jeez Dortmund get absolutely bullied by bayern.
To think that I had to craft dozens of calm-headed, carefully formulated and thought-out posts before I got enough likes to become a full member smh
How the games are spread out matters actually. It has a big impact on recovery, which in turn has a big impact on fitnessEven though having no winter break sounds not helpful, I think English teams don't play more games then the Spanish teams over a full saison. The games are just spread out differently. So this is no valid argument in my view.