Film The Redcafe Movie review thread

Bohemian Rhapsody. I know all the cool memes are against it and the guardian is outraged by its lack of pandering to centrist guardianistas, but I found it enjoyable. As a melodramatic fantasy biopic it's witty, energetic and has an interesting off kilter tone that gives it a little more than most popstar films. As a musical celebration of the band it worked for me and I can take or leave their music. If you liked the elaborate NWA biopic then give this a go, if however you prefer memes then go back to the internet and make fun of Trump's wall or something.

I enjoyed it a lot too, it was quite naff at times but I had a really fun time watching it. Portraying the iconic Freddie Mercury you're on a hiding to nothing really, and I thought Malik did a good a job as could be expected.
 
I've never seen a meme either, just people saying its quite a poor film that tries to pretend that it's dealing with the more serious aspects of Freddie Mercury's life while actually completely trivialising them but that it's somewhat held together by the music of Queen. But why let that get in the way of some boring Trumpian rant about how you like it despite what the snowflakes and the SJW's think when all they really think is that it's not that good.

So memes! I'm reffering to things like the Sacha Baron Cohen story, that painted May and co as concieted and deluded. It captured peoples imaginations and confirmed a certain view that was about after their work with Ben Elton. Then there is bad faith stuff like this dissection of the trailer: https://www.theguardian.com/film/20...pic-trailer-queen-bohemian-rhapsody-queerwash. These things are memetic. I'm referring to memes as ideas passed on as cultural currency, and then purposefully conflating that with the idea of the cheap disposable internet gag, in order to suggest that some of the resistance seems to be based on inaccurate reports and poor reasoning. I'm not suggesting that D.at Boi is now rocking a mic and moustache combo. There was a clear feeling about the film before I had seen it or even read a review, much of which wasn't borne out by my own viewing.

flat-550x75-f.jpg
 
Children of men
Cast: Clive Owen, Julianne Moore, Michael Caine, Chiwetel Ejiofor

Setting: In the future women are no longer able to conceive and the world is essentially post apocalyptic bar London.

Plot: A former activists agrees to help transport a miraculously pregnant woman to a group of people who are out at sea.

Man, I can't believe I hadn't seen this movie before. I thought it was really good and definitely worth a watch if you're looking for something on Netflix.

I know it's not that best source for ratings but IMDB gives it a 7.9, and I have agree. It's a solid 8/10 movie IMO.
Brilliant film, hopefully more people will see it now as it's on Netflix because so many missed it!
 
River of Grass - Kelly Reichardt's debut feature. It had a quite different feel to it than the following films of hers I've seen, very playful shifting between several beats like proto-mumblecore voice over, jazzy montages, 90's deadpan cool and alienation reminiscent of 70's Barbara Loden. She described it best herself, as a "road movie without the road, a love story without the love, and a crime story without the crime". Instead of a Martin Sheen and a Sissy Spacek, there was a Plain Jane and an Average Joe and the futility of escaping Florida's rural, lower class purgatory. The restoration looked incredible, the lack of obvious time markers made it look like it could as well have been made in the early 2010's instead of early 90's.
 
Last edited:
Mystery Team

It's rare that you find a comedy that you've never heard up that is actually funny. This one is surreal and wacky, somewhere between Hot Rod and The Eric Andre Show. Knew nothing about it when I watched it, just knew it had Donald Glover and Aubrey Plaza well before they were famous (it's 10 years old) along with cameos from some other now comedically famous actors (Ellie Kemper, Bobby Moynihan, Ellie Kemper). Basically it's about a group of friends solving a crime (or a mystery) way above their level of expertise. It sure helps that Donald Glover is the lead (he's also one of the writers) and not just some writer dude like the other two.

This movie is defintely not for everyone but Donald Glover goes a long way.
 
Can you ever forgive me Not funny enough, not dark enough, sadly not anything enough. Started well but went nowhere. 5/10
 
Upgrade Not half bad sci fi for the budget but somehow fails to satisfy in the end but I've watched much worse. An OK way to fill an evening. 6.5/10
 
Last edited:
Hereditary

What a silly movie. Why is it so highly rated? I found myself checking the time and all that halfway through the movie. Not a good sign.
 
Hereditary

What a silly movie. Why is it so highly rated? I found myself checking the time and all that halfway through the movie. Not a good sign.

Because horror movies are always shit, so anything a little bit less shit it's considered genius? that's one theory.

I gave it a 6/10 if I remember correctly. Decent enough, but i agree, hardly deserving all the hype.
 
Hereditary

What a silly movie. Why is it so highly rated? I found myself checking the time and all that halfway through the movie. Not a good sign.
I for one enjoyed it. Maybe because horror films usually disappoint or maybe because I really rated the acting, narrative, how it doesn't spoon feed everything, some of the directorial choices (e.g. like staying on the boy after YOU KNOW WHAT happens), not reliant on jump scares etc.
 
Because horror movies are always shit, so anything a little bit less shit it's considered genius? that's one theory.

I gave it a 6/10 if I remember correctly. Decent enough, but i agree, hardly deserving all the hype.
I think it lacked pacing. 127 minutes was too long IMO.
 
Sisters Brothers is a quite rubbish western. It's by the guy who made A Prophet, and my early doubts about his supposed brilliance are aging well (that's right). But: I definitely recommend this film if you have a spare couple of hours because it has a great cast, consisting of four of the most interesting actors working today. And whilst they may not be on top form they make the whole thing very watchable. The material aint great but it's cobbled together well enough and Jacques Audiard is never less than a competent filmmaker.
 
Sisters Brothers is a quite rubbish western. It's by the guy who made A Prophet, and my early doubts about his supposed brilliance are aging well (that's right). But: I definitely recommend this film if you have a spare couple of hours because it has a great cast, consisting of four of the most interesting actors working today. And whilst they may not be on top form they make the whole thing very watchable. The material aint great but it's cobbled together well enough and Jacques Audiard is never less than a competent filmmaker.
It’s a shame to hear that, although the fact it went by so unnoticed was a probably a giveaway.
 
Suspiria (2018)

I've tried to watch the original a few times but could never get through it - I always found myself 'trying' to enjoy it because I thought it was something I was 'supposed' to like. The colours are pretty and everything but the acting and the really bad ADR always made it hard to watch for me.

This new version, I really enjoyed - even though it's a bit long. The editing, drained colour palette, sound - all very hypnotic.

Definitely not going to be everyone's cup of tea, but I was very much drawn in by it.
 
First Man
Despite being quite familiar with this story, I still find this enjoyable. The acting was good, even by Ryan Gosling. It but suspense will, especially in the rocket. Felt very real. The score added a lot to the film. The amount of close up shots also made the film feel very claustrophobic. The pacing was a little too slow tough. Could have been a bit shorter 7/10
 
I watched Fyre last night and haven't laughed so much at a movie in a long long time

Ja Rule :lol:
 
Polar (2019)

A Netflix movie starring Mads Mikkelsen. What do you get if you make John Wick with a better actor? Sounds good right? Ok, now take away the realistic fighting (at least realistic for Hollywood standing) and that's your acting scenes but make them as gory as possible to make up for them being anything special. What more...Crank'd is a similar movie? Lets nick something from that as well. One guy vs everyone in crazy scenarios but lets cut out the humor or at least pretend like we're being funny but we aren't. Add a Bai Ling character as well but not a crazy actress like Bai Ling is so that the point of her gets lost. There must be something more we can nick? I know!
When he escapes like that guy did in Oldboy, let him fight in a tight corrider like in Oldboy. Can't make proper fighting scenes? Ok guns instead.
This all sounds pretty good but what's missing? There is the cartoonish villain and everything so what else? Ah yes,
Let's make the last 20 minutes Taken.

The movie is 2 hours so don't bother watching it. If you really like Mads Mikkelsen it can maybe be a 4 or 5 out of 10. If you don't like him it's a 2.
 
Last edited:
Hell Fest
A masked serial killer turns a horror-themed amusement park into his own personal playground, terrorizing a group of friends while the rest of the patrons believe that it is all part of the show. Pretty standard slasher, tries nothing new, boring characters etc. But at least some of the kills were decent and it was short. Seen worse 4.5/10

Blood Fest
Fans flock to a festival celebrating the most iconic horror movies, only to discover that the charismatic showman behind the event has a diabolical agenda. A similar movie to the above but goes more into the genre-dissecting route like Scream of Cabin in the Woods. Problem is, if you go down this route, you better be funny or witty, it is nether. It has a bunch of characters that know the rules of horror that you must abide by to survive, yet they break the rules at every turn and get killed. Really bad movie 2/10
 
With César (1936) I've finally finished the Marseille trilogy, also consisting of Marius (1931) and Fanny (1932). A swooning, soapy epic of life and the shitty, difficult decisions one has to make. The two first films had a rather rigid visual input, partly due to it's background as a stage play but César capped it off in a more vivid, cinematic style. The three films having three different directors was noticeable too but the sparkling characterization, dialogue and performances by the actors remained consistent throughout. I have a feeling I'll return to these films again at some point.
 
Nilsson's pre-historic film spree reminds me, @Archie Leach when was the last time you saw Mean Streets? Christ, was that a soul destroying experience. Holy shit was that bad.

Remind me to not listen to you film snobs again! :lol: