Vintage M.Night Shymalalalymalan to feck it up. It is a miracle he didn't cast himself in a role as well.
He did.Vintage M.Night Shymalalalymalan to feck it up. It is a miracle he didn't cast himself in a role as well.
Return of the Mouman
A very miserable man unleashes blood-curdling howls outside the haunted Lowry hotel until staff let him retrieve his Vuitton suitcase.
3 fingets/10
The thing I remember about this film is: the world is going to shit, patents are killing their children, basically, everything is fecked. Whilst all this is happening, all Nice Cage wants to do is Donuts in a sports car with his face buried in a woman's titsMom and Dad
A teenage girl and her little brother must survive a wild 24 hours during which a mass hysteria of unknown origins causes parents to turn violently on their own kids.
It was Cage at his crazy best , was not expecting much from this , but I thought it was great.
The bit where Cage was after his son and Henriksen was after Cage was hilarious.
Cage Hams it up with his wacko faces and obviously makes it easy looking like a crazed lunatic. Selma Blair is even creepier as you never know what she is going to do next.
7.5/10
Yes I was going to post about it this morning. I adored it. I'm not even able to say exactly why, I went to the cinema after having slept 4 hours and being hungover, yet I was kept awake throughout, despite the slow rhythm and the lack of actual events. It's pretty much perfect, or as close to perfection as I've seen a film be for a while. The actress playing Hae-Mi is amazing, I thought her performance was very subtle and she's beautiful. The jazz scene was a thing of beauty too.What did you think of Burning? @Rooney in Paris
Solo:
Junk. Multiple different plots and subplots, stupid characterisation, an awful ending.
Han always has a heart of gold? Why? Where is the arc? A thousand twists and betrayals. half of which could be removed. The reveal at the end, mostly unconnected to the film - wtf.
It felt like it was written by multiple people, bits shoehorned in by the studio.
3/10.
Nice!Yes I was going to post about it this morning. I adored it. I'm not even able to say exactly why, I went to the cinema after having slept 4 hours and being hungover, yet I was kept awake throughout, despite the slow rhythm and the lack of actual events. It's pretty much perfect, or as close to perfection as I've seen a film be for a while. The actress playing Hae-Mi is amazing, I thought her performance was very subtle and she's beautiful. The jazz scene was a thing of beauty too.
Good tension build up in the second part of the film but overall a great depiction of the divide between the modern Korea and the rural more traditional part of it.
Nice!
Yeah, the actress was great, hard to believe it was her debut role, the little throwaway pantomime stuff in the beginning was lovely. I would have liked to have seen the dance scene in a cinema, mesmerizing stuff.
Has anyway yet watched 'Polar' 2019, starring Mads Mikkelsen?
Not out yet here. 25th they say. It looks good the premise
Unfortunately, yes.Is Burning available on torrents yet?
would be a travesty so would like to know
Excalibur - The good...great production design and a fine execution of the phantasmagorical sequences. The bad...well, the acting, oh dear, the acting, with a very respectable cast as well. I've no idea what Nicol Williamson was thinking with his performance as Merlin. Terrible dialogue delivered stiffly in silly voices, no camp value whatsoever, just plain bad. The fighting mostly consisted of awkward tin men bumping into each other and falling face down in the mud. Still, it was refreshing to watch a fantasy epic with nothing but practical effects.
I'd probably put Monty Python and the Holy Grail and The Sword in Stone above it, but in terms of serious dramatic work it probably comes up on top, though the only other adaptation I've seen is the Clive Owen/Keira Knighley one so the competition ain't fierce...I liked that film as a kid, but I'm sure it hasn't aged well.
Strangely, I can't think of an arthurian themed film that has been any better though.
I'd probably put Monty Python and the Holy Grail and The Sword in Stone above it, but in terms of serious dramatic work it probably comes up on top, though the only other adaptation I've seen is the Clive Owen/Keira Knighley one so the competition ain't fierce...
My most vivid recollection of King Arthur is a scantily clad Knightley strutting around with a giant bow, remember it as a fairly generic and incoherent film that barely had any resemblance to the Arthurian legend.I can't remember much about the Clive Owen one, apart from it having something to do with Romans. There was First Knight with Sean Connery and Richard Gere as well, which was a bit naff. The recent Charlie Hunnam one was shit, but not quite as bad as some of the reviews suggested.
Monty Python was obviously excellent, but not really serious enough to count. Can't remember Sword In The Stone. Might have to rewatch it some day.