In Time - I'm tempted to say fantastic because I'm not entirely sure it isn't some huge elaborate parody of how much expense is thrown at terribly written popcorn sci-fi. I'm holding out hope that's the case here, otherwise I might just be incredibly angry that scripts like this actually get made.
The premise is of a future society (possibly, not made clear) where the ageing process has been halted at 25 somehow (not made clear - just 'cos) with the catch being that rather than money, the chief unit of currency is time. So the rich have thousands of years to be lazy, arrogant, selfish cartoons, playing poker and being vacuous in a sterile metropolis populated by hundreds of George Osbornes and the poor are all living day to day in shit hole ghetto run by underwear model gangsters in feather hats. There is absolutely no middle ground here, we're in strictly black and white territory. Which is quite funny cos there are virtually no black people in this film. There's one, I think he has about 2 lines. He doesn't have a name though. He sort of wanders around with Cillian Murphy being told to shut up. The rich world is also lit dully in monochrome palets while the poor world is more vibrant. See how deep that shit is? Bang! Subtext bitches!
Despite the intriguing concept and the darker places you could go with the idea of 4 generations of the same family being all physically the same age, this is basically a film based around a series of time puns with a Robin Hood-lite story scribbled around the edges in crayon. "Hey, we could call the police the Time Keepers and the gangsters the Minute Men, and the cities different Time Zones Oh, Oh, and when people give each other their time by holding hands (They can do that for some reason) they can say things like 'don't waste my time' or 'you got a minute?' - yeah, that's frickin awesome dude!...Puns!!" I'm positive most of the writing time was spent thinking of these puns.
I say Robin Hood because Timberlake (for it is he) spends half the time talking about "justice" for no apparent reason at inappropriate times and telling everyone they've been "stealing time" without any real investigation into any of this. At one point he robs and leaves a rich woman with a day to live for seemingly no other reason than he doesn't like rich people. It's a bit odd. We're supposed to think this is ok because he keeps saying it is, but it's never quite fully explained why? (because no-one deserves to be rich presumably? now give us your $20 for our $40m film) There's a sort of subplot backstory about his dad being a kind of freedom fighter (or, perhaps, time bandit? - see what I did there? feck yeah!) at one point, but then that's forgotten about completely. Then it turns into Bonnie & Clyde for a bit.
It's a sort of communist manifesto by way of anti-Darwinism acted out by underwear models that varies between making no sense at all and contradicting itself.
Towards the end there's a brilliant line that would pass for existential profundity if it wasn't so absolutely spasticated. When a rich cartoon dick tries to legitimise the death of poor people in his quest for immortality, Timberlake rebukes him with the line "No one should be immortal if it means even one person has to die" ..An amazing line that fails to even understand itself.
Utter piss water. But worse than that, it's utter piss water that thinks it's got something important to say. But it says it through a series of weak catchphrases, unexplained righteousness, cartoon one dimensional characters AND TIME PUNS!!!! But hopefully, it's all a big joke. In which case 10/10