Seriously? That's what you define as Lynch?
I love that movie. Joseph Gordon Levitt is turning into one of my favorite actors. He's been in that, Lookout, and (500) Days of Summer. All very good movies.
I find people who like his movies to be far more pretentious than Lynch himself. I think because his movies are so abstract, they use it as a badge of honor that they 'get' his movies and love them.Yes...the mans a walking cliche of pretentiousness, right down to the hair. ...There's some kind of self appointed intelligencia intellectual masturbation circle around Lynch which annoys me...I found Blue Velvet one of the most annoying films I've ever seen...there also seems to be some unwritten rule that anyone who is liberal, creative and able to string a coherant sentence together has to adore him which i similarly abhor...for example the Guardian called him "the most important director of this era." which is just absolutely fecking ludicrous... but obviously not his fault.
I'm sure there are many reasons why he's an undoubted genius of some kind, but he's really not for me...
Yeah, hopefully he doesn't do much more GI Joe stuff. That was a terrible movie. He's in another one that's playing in NYC and on Time Warner Cable on demand called Uncertainty. May have to watch it tonight.Yeah I wrote in my post about (500) Days of summer that I liked Joseph Gordon Levitt seems to get mixed reviews amongst my friends though. Good shout on The Lookout really enjoyed that film and another very uncomfortable character for him to play, Jeff Daniels was also very good in that I thought. His next couple of films sound interesting too so hopefully GI Joe wasn't a sign of things to come.
-crowd.I find people who like his movies to be far more pretentious than Lynch himself. I think because his movies are so abstract, they use it as a badge of honor that they 'get' his movies and love them.
Lynch is an odd one. I loved Blue Velvet and The Elephant Man. I'd enjoyed Wild At Heart but Cage's presence spoiled it for me. Mullholland drive was OK but Dune was utter rubbish. So great at his best but more miss than hit for me.
This is his latest project which is interesting DAVIDLYNCH.COM PRESENTS INTERVIEW PROJECT - NEW EPISODE EVERY THREE DAYS
I find people who like his movies to be far more pretentious than Lynch himself. I think because his movies are so abstract, they use it as a badge of honor that they 'get' his movies and love them.
And I find most people who don't like Lynch to be a result of the polarization of the; -crowd.
And Mockers - you think Lost is brilliant. You're not allowed an opinion now.
I sometimes do that. But then I'll go through 13 movies in a month or something like that.I really should cancel my Netflix susbcription. I have a Bergman movie I rented back in March still lying with me.
You can never have too much french new wave.Yeah I think I'll change to one movie at a time. And I should revise my queue. I have too much french new wave in it right now when what I really feel like watching is more Cary Grant and Bogart.
I want to see A Single Man. Interested to see how Tom Ford directs.Saw the trailer for Crazy Heart a couple of days back. Looks like this year's Wrestler. That and A Single Man.
Well i've just seen Cannibal Holocaust. Other than the whole sale slaughter of every critter they came across, quite tame, badly acted and very funny. I felt it just needed a Crow, Servo and Mike sillhouetted commentary throughout and it would have been great.
6/10
Well i've just seen Cannibal Holocaust. Other than the whole sale slaughter of every critter they came across, quite tame, badly acted and very funny. I felt it just needed a Crow, Servo and Mike sillhouetted commentary throughout and it would have been great.
6/10
I thought it was quite well done. Some of the scenes were genuinely shocking and it was nothing like I had seen before. Dont remember much though. It's been about 8 years since I saw it. still remember the scene of the woman impaled on a pole and the one where the guy's dick is chopped off.
Moon One of the better sci-fi films of recent years and made on a small budget by Hollywood standards - about 5 mill. The makers state that they intended to make it a homage to sci-fi films of the 70's and 80's and if I have a criticism it is that it is more a copy at times than a homage. It feels like Silent Running meets 2001 with a few concepts from Blade Runner thrown in for good measure. But I nit pick because it is a fascinating watch with a superb performance from Sam Rockwell. 8.5/10
The Last Samurai
Plot
Nathan Algren(Tom Cruise) is some ex-American general who is hired by the Japanese to lead their army in war against the Samurai. He's captured by the Samurais during battle and learns their ways while living in captivity.
Review
Fantastic movie. It's one of my favourite ones. Ken Watanabe was fantastic as Katsumuto... I think that was his name. The whole thing is shot in a beautiful place(in the mountains of Japan, I guess) -- it's a beautiful movie.
One of those movies you'd love to watch on a day when you're bored as feck.
8.5/10
Harry Brown
Micheal Caine plays a retired Marine who lives alone. His wife is dieing and when his only real friend is brutally murdered by a local gang, Harry decides to seek revenge for this crime and goes on a vigilante crusade. It's not an action packed thriller by any means though, the plot moves along slowly and focuses on the lonliness of Harry and his reaction to how low humanity can sink in society.
Micheal Caine plays the part superbly and you really feel empathy for his character and Ben Drew is well worth mentioning for his performance as the sociopathic yob. The film draws a few comparisons to Gran Torino, I'm undecided as to which is better but Harry Brown is certainly more gritty and shocking.
7.5/10
Second viewing of Aguirre:Wrath of God. Still brilliant.
Le Cercle Rouge: 8.5/10
Alright, so it wasn't quite as awesome as Rififi but a pretty good French heist movie nonetheless. One thing that bugged me was that it had at least two story arcs that went nowhere. Starring two actors that I don't know and Yves Montand (Wages of Fear, oh what a movie, what a movie that is).
Four Weddings and a fecking Funeral
The first thing you're probably wondering is why any man worth his testicles would want to watch this massive gayfest of a film for any reason other than that his missus chose the movie. The answer is that it appeared in the Guardian's list of the greatest British films ever made so I decided to give it a chance.
What a mistake that was. Two hours of aneurysm inducing wankery about love and relationships with not one iota of wit or irony to make it tolerable. There's literally not a single funny piece of dialogue in the entire movie.
But the biggest of this film's many problems was that the main female love interest, the focal point of the film for feck's sake, was really rather dull and unremarkable. The fact that Andie McDowell was the actress involved was a major reason for this, but the writing certainly didn't help. Throw in Hugh Grant in rent-a-fop mode and a cast of characters whom, presumably, were supposed to be endearing and eccentric, but were actually just a bit annoying, and you have all the ingredients for a two hour cinematic experience in which your only motivation to continue is to see if it eventually gets any better.
2/10