Pogue Mahone
Closet Gooner.
Every movie on his list is either excellent, or I haven’t seen it. With one notable exception. I thought Hurt Locker was bang average. Never understood why it got so much praise.
Boy Kills WorldBoy Kills World
Really enjoyed this one. Uber violent action flick with some nice humour. I think the humour and the lack of annoying Greengrass cam just give it the edge of the very similar and recently released Monkey Man. Turn your brain off and enjoy.
The first act or whatever of The Hurt Locker, with Guy Pearce, was really good, a lot of tension, shot really well. Then the movie went downhill, culminating in Jeremy Renner going rogue with a gun in the middle of the night silliness.Every movie on his list is either excellent, or I haven’t seen it. With one notable exception. I thought Hurt Locker was bang average. Never understood why it got so much praise.
The first act or whatever of The Hurt Locker, with Guy Pearce, was really good, a lot of tension, shot really well. Then the movie went downhill, culminating in Jeremy Renner going rogue with a gun in the middle of the night silliness.
I dont know what the movie would be about without the downward spiral silliness of the 2nd half. Wouldn't be listing it in my top 20 in a million years, doubt i'd even remember it. But i could easily believe it was directed by Michael Mann. I haven't watched it or thought of it since release so maybe im just misremembering it.The first act or whatever of The Hurt Locker, with Guy Pearce, was really good, a lot of tension, shot really well. Then the movie went downhill, culminating in Jeremy Renner going rogue with a gun in the middle of the night silliness.
I think Bigelow underestimated the level of antipathy she would engender with her counterfactual alt-history Republican-fluffing jingoistic horseshit** follow up Zero Dark Thirty. It makes it easier to retroactively dislike her work even more so.I dont know what the movie would be about without the downward spiral silliness of the 2nd half. Wouldn't be listing it in my top 20 in a million years, doubt i'd even remember it. But i could easily believe it was directed by Michael Mann. I haven't watched it or thought of it since release so maybe im just misremembering it.
Looking up Bigelow's movies and i didn't know she directed Near Dark which people were talking about recently.
I missed that movie at the time and never went back to watch it. Bit of a weird omission, I'd usually watch most bigger releases and it won a couple of awards too didn't it?I think Bigelow underestimated the level of antipathy she would engender with her counterfactual alt-history Republican-fluffing jingoistic horseshit** follow up Zero Dark Thirty. It makes it easier to retroactively dislike her work even more so.
**to recap, her movie showed that the CIA program of "extraordinary rendition" was justified. When people pointed out to her that torturing suspects at secret black sites after kidnapping them was not only un-American, but also in violation of all kinds of international treaties. And further, when she was reminded that it was pure grunt work that led to the break in finding Bin Laden, and had nothing to do with torture and waterboarding people, she was incensed. So, feck her, and feck Zero Dark Thirty. Although I liked Near Dark!
It's an insidious document of a very shameful period. Excusing the kidnapping, torture, and illegal confinement of people under the guise of an intrepid female CIA analyst's dogged pursuit leading to a breakthrough against Bin Laden -- it sells the lie for future generations that what we did was not only effective, but moral. It's the kind of big lie that you'd expect from a North Korea.I missed that movie at the time and never went back to watch it. Bit of a weird omission, I'd usually watch most bigger releases and it won a couple of awards too didn't it?
Guess i'll skip it.
Whatever about her other movies Near Dark is great
The Booth At The End
Really interesting premise. Xander Berkeley calmly trotting out of one of the most naturally brilliant acting performances I’ve seen on screen. Really enjoyable and compelling first hour and a half. Very disappointing that they couldn’t stick the landing. Good watch though.
7/10 (9/10 if it had an ending that worked).
I did the same, and after several minutes assumed the TV show was what was meant.This intrigued me but now I'm confused. All I can find with this name is a TV series. You watched a movie?
I did the same, and after several minutes assumed the TV show was what was meant.
Yeah this is a nice little film. Some of the performances are a bit dodgy and the ending is a bit shit, but overall it's a fun watch.The Man from Earth
Stumbled upon this last night and really enjoyed it. School professor having an impromptu leaving do with some of his colleagues and reveals he is actually 1400 years old and has to move on every 10 years so friends etc do not really notice he doesn’t age.
Being the first time he has disclosed this information about himself to anyone he invites them to ask questions about his life and memories.
Quite a low budget film with no flashbacks to ’his life’ but it works better as it keeps the mystery for the viewer alongside his colleagues.
8.5/10
The Man from Earth
Stumbled upon this last night and really enjoyed it. School professor having an impromptu leaving do with some of his colleagues and reveals he is actually 1400 years old and has to move on every 10 years so friends etc do not really notice he doesn’t age.
Being the first time he has disclosed this information about himself to anyone he invites them to ask questions about his life and memories.
Quite a low budget film with no flashbacks to ’his life’ but it works better as it keeps the mystery for the viewer alongside his colleagues.
8.5/10
Yeah it's one of those films where you have to commit and once it grabs hold of you, it's really enjoyable.I tried to watch this when I was much younger and turned it off because I was bored. I think I'd probably appreciate it more now I've got the patience.
This intrigued me but now I'm confused. All I can find with this name is a TV series. You watched a movie?
I tried to watch this when I was much younger and turned it off because I was bored. I think I'd probably appreciate it more now I've got the patience.
It suffers a lot for the fact the acting, directing and staging are all solidly American cable TV movie level. Also the fact the main character is called ‘John Oldman’ is a lot funnier than it’s probably meant to be.
It’d be interesting to see it done with more prestige, or as a play… which I assume it was probably written to be
No worries. I watched both Pale Flower and Asphalt Jungle few days back and definitely can see the influence on Mann. Will have to give the Hurt Locker a watch at some point.I've had a tab opened for a few days to answer this, kept forgetting! Really like his list, those I know make a lot of sense, and there's a few others I haven't seen that I'll try to watch.
Hurt Locker was very unsurprising, the methodical focus on professionals in an intense environment is very Mann-esque.
Also the fact the main character is called ‘John Oldman’ is a lot funnier than it’s probably meant to be.
I was on a plane this weekend and saw they had Poor Things. So that was cool and I turned it on - and off again after 20 minutes when I remember what the film was about and figured that could look a little awkward on a plan for other people glancing at my screen.
So I watched a King Crimson documentary instead.
And then they watched it together for the rest?Reminds me of a friend of mine watching Wolf of Wall Street on his iPad on a train. He got a tap on his shoulder and paused the movie to see a ticket inspector looming over him. Naturally, he had paused the movie on a still image of cocaine being blown up a hooker’s arse.
I'm a big fan of found footage films and this is the best one in my opinion.Cloverfield
Watched it again last night. While it will never be impactful as a first watch, I’ve not seen it for years. It’s an absolutely incredible movie. It copped a lot of shit at the time for not being the film that people thought it was going to be, but watching again away from that silliness lets it shine a lot brighter. Exceptional.
9/10
Agree, fantastic film. Would love to see it in a cinema again at some point.Cloverfield
Watched it again last night. While it will never be impactful as a first watch, I’ve not seen it for years. It’s an absolutely incredible movie. It copped a lot of shit at the time for not being the film that people thought it was going to be, but watching again away from that silliness lets it shine a lot brighter. Exceptional.
9/10
It was a much better film than the mediocre Immaculate, for me. Definitely helped that I saw The first omen before Immaculate, but even with that in mind, Immaculate was very meh (and I really like Sydney Sweeney and was hoping to like it!)The First Omen:
Prequel to the famous Omen series. It was a decent watch, well directed (especially for a directorial debut) and good acting as well as some harrowing scenes that stick with you. Having said that, the first act is slow and plodding, which extends the run time to a length this film didn't need to be. This is also an identical film to Immaculate, beat for beat, narrative, characters and theme... they're the same movie. This, however, was more of a disadvantage for Omen as opposed to Immaculate with it being a prequel. I usually don't like prequels because you know where the story is going and if the film tries to give you a new meaning to the rest of the series, you end up with Alien Covenant... it feels like a lose-lose situation. If you haven't seen Immaculate or are a big Omen fan, give it a watch 6/10
I found them about the same. Omen was definitely better as a standalone but with it being a prequel and also with my expectations for it being higher, I felt more disappointed with it.It was a much better film than the mediocre Immaculate, for me. Definitely helped that I saw The first omen before Immaculate, but even with that in mind, Immaculate was very meh (and I really like Sydney Sweeney and was hoping to like it!)
In A Violent Nature
Found this to be a bit of a mixed bag. I appreciated the stripped back aesthetic and different approach to the slasher/psycho killer genre but I also found it to be quite boring at times, particularly when nobody is being killed. A good portion of the film is just a static camera following our killer walking through a forest with only the sounds of birds tweeting and leaves crunching under his feet.
When the kills come though they are incredibly gruesome with one about half way through in particular being hilariously demented (seriously, you won't believe it).
And the ending, without spoiling anything, just didn't work for me. It came off like they were going for some Cormac McCarthy / No Country type vibe but it just felt overly pretentious. Nothing in the previous 90 odd minutes warranted it.