Film The Redcafe Movie review thread

Vengeance (2022), starring and directed by BJ Novak.

Good movie with a bad title. Ben, a New York podcaster, is informed his "girlfriend" has died, and her family requests his presence at her funeral. When he arrives, he learns that the girl has been murdered - at least in the eyes of her family. Ben decides to solve the girl's murder and turn it into a podcast, despite the fact she wasn't his girlfriend, but just a girl he hooked up with.

So there is some fish-out-of-water stuff, some NY intellectual in backwater Texas stuff, and some wacky local characterizations (like the extended What a Burger riffs). The tone was hard to maintain, because some people are playing it broadly, like Ashton Kutcher as a record producer, and some are playing pretty straight. Ben is the snarky observer, and they eventually call him on that too.

It's a dark comedy, and some moments are genuinely funny. It's almost in the Duplass brothers' wheelhouse, somewhat tonally like Safety Not Guaranteed, or the Adam Goldberg movie "Untitled". It's well made. The only real gripe with it, is the ending is not earned. The ending is one of those, "did it really happen? Is it just the main character fantasizing?" But whether it happened or whether it was just what Ben felt like doing, it feels like a reshoot. The solution to the mystery
is that Abby OD'd and Ashton Kutcher took her to a spot in the desert that is disputed jurisdiction between 4 agencies, and left her to die. It's a pretty downbeat ending. Ben learns this because Ashton confesses.
But then Ben shoots Ashton several times, and deletes all the recordings he'd made for the podcast. That is some left field, "hey, we need a snappier ending says the focus group" type of shit.


I enjoyed the movie. There were a couple of really funny moments. When Abby's brother Ty asks Ben to find the killer and help him kill the killer, Ben says he's not in a Liam Neeson movie. Ty says, you do look like a character in a Liam Neeson movie. Then he says, Schindler's List, yeah, you look like a lot of people in that movie (because Ben is Jewish). That cracked me up. Another part, was where Ty tells him where they live. Ben asks if they are near Austin? Ty says, have you heard of Abilene? Ben says no. Ty says, Abilene is about 3 hours from Austin - and then says 'and we're 5 hours from Abilene'. It was funny.

BJ Novak is entertaining, has kind of a Ben Stiller vibe, but not the please-punch-me-in-the-face thing that Stiller often does (and I like Stiller). Ben Stiller meets Thomas Middleditch (Silicon Valley). I think points get taken away from this score because not only is the ending unearned, but also they keep forgetting this is ostensibly about a young woman who was murdered. There was somewhat of a Lasse Halstrom vibe to the characters, Gilbert Grape sort of thing (and I hated that movie).

7/10
 
Last edited:
That novel was actually made into a different (very good) film.
I haven't seen the film, but I'll look for it. That book was part of the syllabus for a class I took in college on sci-fi literature, one of the best classes I had. I'm looking up Ballard now and seeing 6 of his works have been turned into films, and there are a raft of his novels I haven't read. And I had forgotten The Atrocity Exhibition was his verbiage (used by Joy Division).
 
I 100% agree with you. Parasite and Train to Busan are both fantastic. Surprised quite a few people here dislike both movies.
I liked Train To Busan a lot. I didn't think Parasite was all that interesting. It made me want to rewatch Purple Noon [Plein Soleil], or The Talented Mr. Ripley. Not the exact same idea obviously, but the person faking their way into the rich world, and then having disastrous consequences, was more pronounced (and done better) in both movies versions of Ripley.
 
I haven't seen the film, but I'll look for it. That book was part of the syllabus for a class I took in college on sci-fi literature, one of the best classes I had. I'm looking up Ballard now and seeing 6 of his works have been turned into films, and there are a raft of his novels I haven't read. And I had forgotten The Atrocity Exhibition was his verbiage (used by Joy Division).
Word of warning, I've seen the film and absolutely hated it. Genuinely couldn't stand it. I'm not sure how much our tastes overlap, however!
 
Vengeance (2022), starring and directed by BJ Novak.

Good movie with a bad title. Ben, a New York podcaster, is informed his "girlfriend" has died, and her family requests his presence at her funeral. When he arrives, he learns that the girl has been murdered - at least in the eyes of her family. Ben decides to solve the girl's murder and turn it into a podcast, despite the fact she wasn't his girlfriend, but just a girl he hooked up with.

So there is some fish-out-of-water stuff, some NY intellectual in backwater Texas stuff, and some wacky local characterizations (like the extended What a Burger riffs). The tone was hard to maintain, because some people are playing it broadly, like Ashton Kutcher as a record producer, and some are playing pretty straight. Ben is the snarky observer, and they eventually call him on that too.

It's a dark comedy, and some moments are genuinely funny. It's almost in the Duplass brothers' wheelhouse, somewhat tonally like Safety Not Guaranteed, or the Adam Goldberg movie "Untitled". It's well made. The only real gripe with it, is the ending is not earned. The ending is one of those, "did it really happen? Is it just the main character fantasizing?" But whether it happened or whether it was just what Ben felt like doing, it feels like a reshoot. The solution to the mystery
is that Abby OD'd and Ashton Kutcher took her to a spot in the desert that is disputed jurisdiction between 4 agencies, and left her to die. It's a pretty downbeat ending. Ben learns this because Ashton confesses.
But then Ben shoots Ashton several times, and deletes all the recordings he'd made for the podcast. That is some left field, "hey, we need a snappier ending says the focus group" type of shit.


I enjoyed the movie. There were a couple of really funny moments. When Abby's brother Ty asks Ben to find the killer and help him kill the killer, Ben says he's not in a Liam Neeson movie. Ty says, you do look like a character in a Liam Neeson movie. Then he says, Schindler's List, yeah, you look like a lot of people in that movie (because Ben is Jewish). That cracked me up. Another part, was where Ty tells him where they live. Ben asks if they are near Austin? Ty says, have you heard of Abilene? Ben says no. Ty says, Abilene is about 3 hours from Austin - and then says 'and we're 5 hours from Abilene'. It was funny.

BJ Novak is entertaining, has kind of a Ben Stiller vibe, but not the please-punch-me-in-the-face thing that Stiller often does (and I like Stiller). Ben Stiller meets Thomas Middleditch (Silicon Valley). I think points get taken away from this score because not only is the ending unearned, but also they keep forgetting this is ostensibly about a young woman who was murdered. There was somewhat of a Lasse Halstrom vibe to the characters, Gilbert Grape sort of thing (and I hated that movie).

7/10
This sounds somewhat interesting, will try to watch it!
 
:lol:

Will have to give this a watch.

I’d say it’s definitely worth a watch! It’s not a masterpiece or anything but in a genre where there’s so much shit it does stand out. And despite my glib comment there is underlying thematic work going on, I just prefer the monster killing things :lol:
Amar's posts in this thread have been consistently ridiculous from the get go, he was lecturing people about their opinion of the film before even seeing it, and getting angry that some people could love it. The irony of him criticizing people who "had decided beforehand it was great" is absolutely delicious, though.

At the very least, he's been consistent in here.

Couldn’t post this in the Barbie thread but I watched Silence after seeing a bunch of your posts praising it, and I loved it. Took three attempts, the third time I finally sat down and banned myself from using my phone/other distractions (which I’m awful for). Fantastic film.
 
Couldn’t post this in the Barbie thread but I watched Silence after seeing a bunch of your posts praising it, and I loved it. Took three attempts, the third time I finally sat down and banned myself from using my phone/other distractions (which I’m awful for). Fantastic film.
Aw I'm glad! It's a somewhat overlooked film in his filmography, even though it's gorgeously put together and carried by a great cast. I guess it's a bit dry and slow at times, but it's got a very meditative flow that goes perfectly with the themes at hand. It's a brilliant film.
 
Japanese cinema > Korean.


I got bored of the melancholy.

Japanese can be hit or miss. Their taste is quite particular in movies. When they get it right they get it right, but most of time their flavor can be a bit... different

Korean movies was produced and designed to cater to worldwide audience hence they got more hit than miss. Their mainstream movies are practically hollywood in korean languages, updated with bright color and cool addons.
 
Japanese can be hit or miss. Their taste is quite particular in movies. When they get it right they get it right, but most of time their flavor can be a bit... different

Korean movies was produced and designed to cater to worldwide audience hence they got more hit than miss. Their mainstream movies are practically hollywood in korean languages, updated with bright color and cool addons.
I think Space Sweepers (2022) makes your point, and drives it in to the hilt. I personally enjoyed the hell out of Space Sweepers. It is absolutely jammed to the gills with VFX and they are done with a really high degree of skill. Unlike a Marvel movie, in which I am often bored because of the warm and fuzzy VFX wankery, Space Sweepers was a lot more vivid. I admit it took me 2 viewings to fully understand what the relationships were between the characters, but that also might partially be due to watching it in Korean (whenever possible I watch foreign films with the original dialogue. Unless I'm drunk).

The first 10 or 15 minutes are very clunky and I think they did not "set the table" (as they say) for telling the audience what the story is going to be about. It's not a long, quiet intro, like in Alien, for example, where not much happens for the first 20 minutes of the movie. It's a very frenetic, almost hyper kinetic movie, and it's not clear at the outset who we are supposed to be identifying with. Anyway, Space Sweepers seems like a Hollywood movie if they would make a big budget sci-fi space western with original IP instead of recycled comic book shit.

I really liked what they did with the robot character. You can see it being badass in the trailer. The cast was really good. The art direction things like space ships, the look of the interiors, all that was amazing. The visual style is nutrient-dense and it can actually get a little wearying on your eyes, on though, because you don't really know what aspect of this future tech you're supposed to be focusing on.

Balls. This has turned into a de facto review of Space Sweepers, instead of just amplifying Sky's point.

8/10.

 
Last edited:
Vengeance (2022), starring and directed by BJ Novak.

Good movie with a bad title. Ben, a New York podcaster, is informed his "girlfriend" has died, and her family requests his presence at her funeral. When he arrives, he learns that the girl has been murdered - at least in the eyes of her family. Ben decides to solve the girl's murder and turn it into a podcast, despite the fact she wasn't his girlfriend, but just a girl he hooked up with.

So there is some fish-out-of-water stuff, some NY intellectual in backwater Texas stuff, and some wacky local characterizations (like the extended What a Burger riffs). The tone was hard to maintain, because some people are playing it broadly, like Ashton Kutcher as a record producer, and some are playing pretty straight. Ben is the snarky observer, and they eventually call him on that too.

It's a dark comedy, and some moments are genuinely funny. It's almost in the Duplass brothers' wheelhouse, somewhat tonally like Safety Not Guaranteed, or the Adam Goldberg movie "Untitled". It's well made. The only real gripe with it, is the ending is not earned. The ending is one of those, "did it really happen? Is it just the main character fantasizing?" But whether it happened or whether it was just what Ben felt like doing, it feels like a reshoot. The solution to the mystery
is that Abby OD'd and Ashton Kutcher took her to a spot in the desert that is disputed jurisdiction between 4 agencies, and left her to die. It's a pretty downbeat ending. Ben learns this because Ashton confesses.
But then Ben shoots Ashton several times, and deletes all the recordings he'd made for the podcast. That is some left field, "hey, we need a snappier ending says the focus group" type of shit.


I enjoyed the movie. There were a couple of really funny moments. When Abby's brother Ty asks Ben to find the killer and help him kill the killer, Ben says he's not in a Liam Neeson movie. Ty says, you do look like a character in a Liam Neeson movie. Then he says, Schindler's List, yeah, you look like a lot of people in that movie (because Ben is Jewish). That cracked me up. Another part, was where Ty tells him where they live. Ben asks if they are near Austin? Ty says, have you heard of Abilene? Ben says no. Ty says, Abilene is about 3 hours from Austin - and then says 'and we're 5 hours from Abilene'. It was funny.

BJ Novak is entertaining, has kind of a Ben Stiller vibe, but not the please-punch-me-in-the-face thing that Stiller often does (and I like Stiller). Ben Stiller meets Thomas Middleditch (Silicon Valley). I think points get taken away from this score because not only is the ending unearned, but also they keep forgetting this is ostensibly about a young woman who was murdered. There was somewhat of a Lasse Halstrom vibe to the characters, Gilbert Grape sort of thing (and I hated that movie).

7/10
Watched it a while back and really enjoyed it. Quite enjoyed how it presented the NY intellectual vs backwater Texan stuff. The Checkov's gun reference made me laugh. It was surprising and much better than the first 30 minutes would suggest.
 
Watched it a while back and really enjoyed it. Quite enjoyed how it presented the NY intellectual vs backwater Texan stuff. The Checkov's gun reference made me laugh. It was surprising and much better than the first 30 minutes would suggest.
Yep, agree. That usually indicates something was rewritten and reshot. I wonder if that's what happened here.
 
Yep, agree. That usually indicates something was rewritten and reshot. I wonder if that's what happened here.
I didn't think so. I think it was suggestive of a very cliched, well worn, fish out of water kind of plot but was intentionally playing with them expectations and doing something quite weird with it. I think being surprising was very much intended.
 
I think Space Sweepers (2022) makes your point, and drives it in to the hilt. I personally enjoyed the hell out of Space Sweepers. It is absolutely jammed to the gills with VFX and they are done with a really high degree of skill. Unlike a Marvel movie, in which I am often bored because of the warm and fuzzy VFX wankery, Space Sweepers was a lot more vivid. I admit it took me 2 viewings to fully understand what the relationships were between the characters, but that also might partially be due to watching it in Korean (whenever possible I watch foreign films with the original dialogue. Unless I'm drunk).

The first 10 or 15 minutes are very clunky and I think they did not "set the table" (as they say) for telling the audience what the story is going to be about. It's not a long, quiet intro, like in Alien, for example, where not much happens for the first 20 minutes of the movie. It's a very frenetic, almost hyper kinetic movie, and it's not clear at the outset who we are supposed to be identifying with. Anyway, Space Sweepers seems like a Hollywood movie if they would make a big budget sci-fi space western with original IP instead of recycled comic book shit.

I really liked what they did with the robot character. You can see it being badass in the trailer. The cast was really good. The art direction things like space ships, the look of the interiors, all that was amazing. The visual style is nutrient-dense and it can actually get a little wearying on your eyes, on though, because you don't really know what aspect of this future tech you're supposed to be focusing on.

Balls. This has turned into a de facto review of Space Sweepers, instead of just amplifying Sky's point.

8/10.


Space Sweepers was great. My wife absolutely loved it and wants to watch it again, so eventually I might get that second viewing where I figure out those character relationships as well - although it seemd pretty clear I thought? Anyway, quite a good movie, yeah.

Why would you ever watch a dubbed movie though? I mean, I do with my kids cause they can't read that fast yet. But otherwise - I just can't stand it.
 
Space Sweepers was great. My wife absolutely loved it and wants to watch it again, so eventually I might get that second viewing where I figure out those character relationships as well - although it seemd pretty clear I thought? Anyway, quite a good movie, yeah.

Why would you ever watch a dubbed movie though? I mean, I do with my kids cause they can't read that fast yet. But otherwise - I just can't stand it.
Well, on the first viewing of SS, it seemed like that whole crew was against the main character, and they also appeared to be very sexist or misogynistic against the lone female. I didn't get that they were a team (as opposed to thrown together briefly) until the second half of the film. On the second viewing, since I knew they would come around, it made them seem more amiable. I don't know, sometimes I'm fecking around on my phone during movies, maybe that's what happened.

I watch movies in the original generally because the acting is just so much better. I do that for French, German, Italian, and Spanish films, because I sorta know those languages. Not great at them, but I've done the DuoLingo trees on all of them, and took French in college. For Asian languages, particularly Mandarin, and Japanese if it's an action type of film, I used dubbed because the original inflections are just so opposite of the emotions we think they are conveying. Japanese in particular, that harsh, barked, quick dialogue that is common for dudes, I can't take too much of that. If the subtitles are coherent, I can deal, but occasionally you have to jump out and go for dubbed because you can tell they are just not bothering giving you the information clearly being presented on screen.
 
Well, on the first viewing of SS, it seemed like that whole crew was against the main character, and they also appeared to be very sexist or misogynistic against the lone female. I didn't get that they were a team (as opposed to thrown together briefly) until the second half of the film. On the second viewing, since I knew they would come around, it made them seem more amiable. I don't know, sometimes I'm fecking around on my phone during movies, maybe that's what happened.
I might also have been overestimating myself and have totally forgotten that I really only started to understand things much further on the film. :lol:
I watch movies in the original generally because the acting is just so much better. I do that for French, German, Italian, and Spanish films, because I sorta know those languages. Not great at them, but I've done the DuoLingo trees on all of them, and took French in college. For Asian languages, particularly Mandarin, and Japanese if it's an action type of film, I used dubbed because the original inflections are just so opposite of the emotions we think they are conveying. Japanese in particular, that harsh, barked, quick dialogue that is common for dudes, I can't take too much of that. If the subtitles are coherent, I can deal, but occasionally you have to jump out and go for dubbed because you can tell they are just not bothering giving you the information clearly being presented on screen.
Yeah, I get that. It's messy also for languages that have a fundamentally different structure and don't at all say the key words where I'd expect them - so characters stress parts of their speech in ways that seem unpredictable to me.

Still, I just can't stand when the sound doesn't match the movement of the mouth, so I never choose dubbing myself. But I see where you're coming from.
 
Vengeance (2022), starring and directed by BJ Novak.

Good movie with a bad title. Ben, a New York podcaster, is informed his "girlfriend" has died, and her family requests his presence at her funeral. When he arrives, he learns that the girl has been murdered - at least in the eyes of her family. Ben decides to solve the girl's murder and turn it into a podcast, despite the fact she wasn't his girlfriend, but just a girl he hooked up with.

So there is some fish-out-of-water stuff, some NY intellectual in backwater Texas stuff, and some wacky local characterizations (like the extended What a Burger riffs). The tone was hard to maintain, because some people are playing it broadly, like Ashton Kutcher as a record producer, and some are playing pretty straight. Ben is the snarky observer, and they eventually call him on that too.

It's a dark comedy, and some moments are genuinely funny. It's almost in the Duplass brothers' wheelhouse, somewhat tonally like Safety Not Guaranteed, or the Adam Goldberg movie "Untitled". It's well made. The only real gripe with it, is the ending is not earned. The ending is one of those, "did it really happen? Is it just the main character fantasizing?" But whether it happened or whether it was just what Ben felt like doing, it feels like a reshoot. The solution to the mystery
is that Abby OD'd and Ashton Kutcher took her to a spot in the desert that is disputed jurisdiction between 4 agencies, and left her to die. It's a pretty downbeat ending. Ben learns this because Ashton confesses.
But then Ben shoots Ashton several times, and deletes all the recordings he'd made for the podcast. That is some left field, "hey, we need a snappier ending says the focus group" type of shit.


I enjoyed the movie. There were a couple of really funny moments. When Abby's brother Ty asks Ben to find the killer and help him kill the killer, Ben says he's not in a Liam Neeson movie. Ty says, you do look like a character in a Liam Neeson movie. Then he says, Schindler's List, yeah, you look like a lot of people in that movie (because Ben is Jewish). That cracked me up. Another part, was where Ty tells him where they live. Ben asks if they are near Austin? Ty says, have you heard of Abilene? Ben says no. Ty says, Abilene is about 3 hours from Austin - and then says 'and we're 5 hours from Abilene'. It was funny.

BJ Novak is entertaining, has kind of a Ben Stiller vibe, but not the please-punch-me-in-the-face thing that Stiller often does (and I like Stiller). Ben Stiller meets Thomas Middleditch (Silicon Valley). I think points get taken away from this score because not only is the ending unearned, but also they keep forgetting this is ostensibly about a young woman who was murdered. There was somewhat of a Lasse Halstrom vibe to the characters, Gilbert Grape sort of thing (and I hated that movie).

7/10
Cheers for this as it wasn't on my radar. They did good using west Texas as a setting; even got the two guns mounted in the truck windows right. Having lived there, in some ways it's even more an absurd locale. I agree on the ending; I thought
one of the brothers had copped on to what was going on or there had been a conversation off-screen, then took their vengeance. That would have made more sense.
They also got Whataburger right: I think it's legendary just because it's always open. It's barely McDonald's quality just with more toppings; their only redeeming factor is the bizarrely good ketchup.
7/10 (Whataburger spicy ketchup: 10/10)
 
Last edited:
The Pale Blue Eyes

A world-weary detective is hired to investigate the murder of a West Point cadet. Stymied by the cadets' code of silence, he enlists one of their own to help unravel the case - a young man the world would come to know as Edgar Allan Poe.
I dont normally do period drama's, but I went in to this one blind and I thought it was excellent.
The cast was excellent, story was decent, it was eery and full of suspense.
Bale was brilliant, a particularly good detective, Harry Melling has the young Poe equally has good.
Only down side was the ending.

7/10
 
I watched The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar, Wes Anderson's first Roald Dahl short (40 minutes) for Netflix, and found it delightful. I've been a fan of Wes for years but I thought he disappeared a little bit up his own arsehole in his last few movies (Asteroid City and French Dispatch). This is a quirky story quirkily told, Ben Kingsley and Benedict Cumberbatch both seem to be having fun, and the shorter runtime actually felt like a pretty good antidote to Wes fatigue. Would recommend everyone to give it a watch, could even be a gateway Wes movie for some due to the runtime, which largely flies by, though a few meta-heavy monologues drag out a tad too much.
 
Last edited:
Cheers for this as it wasn't on my radar. They did good using west Texas as a setting; even got the two guns mounted in the truck windows right. Having lived there, in some ways it's even more an absurd locale. I agree on the ending; I thought
one of the brothers had copped on to what was going on or there had been a conversation off-screen, then took their vengeance. That would have made more sense.
They also got Whataburger right: I think it's legendary just because it's always open. It's barely McDonald's quality just with more toppings; their only redeeming factor is the bizarrely good ketchup.
7/10 (Whataburger spicy ketchup: 10/10)
Your ending would have fit better, certainly. The ending they went with was like a person about to be executed suddenly gets a phone call from the Governor and is pardoned, out of the blue, roll credits.
There was nothing in the film that indicated Ben would suddenly turn murderous. If anything, his whole character would rail against the idea of vigilante justice. He would have just called the police, because his podcast would have been huge, he'd be a hero, and the person responsible would go to prison.
That made we wonder if it was like the coda in Taxi Driver, where Travis is recuperating and reading a thank you card from Iris' parents: it makes you wonder if those events were all in the character's head. As in, Travis imagined himself a hero, saving Iris, but it could just be a further level of psychosis and he did nothing of the sort. I read somewhere that Scorsese and Paul Schrader said that it was not meant to be hallucinatory, that Travis really did those things and really was hailed as a hero.
 
The Pale Blue Eyes

A world-weary detective is hired to investigate the murder of a West Point cadet. Stymied by the cadets' code of silence, he enlists one of their own to help unravel the case - a young man the world would come to know as Edgar Allan Poe.
I dont normally do period drama's, but I went in to this one blind and I thought it was excellent.
The cast was excellent, story was decent, it was eery and full of suspense.
Bale was brilliant, a particularly good detective, Harry Melling has the young Poe equally has good.
Only down side was the ending.

7/10
I thought Bale & Melling were really good too. The ending was a little too cute. At 130 minutes, I think it was probably 30 minutes too long. Scott Cooper's work is interesting, he's good, but although I like his films (Crazy Heart, Out of the Furnace, Black Mass, Hostiles, Antlers), I haven't been blown away by any of them.

 
I watched The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar, Wes Anderson's first Roald Dahl short (40 minutes) for Netflix, and found it delightful. I've been a fan of Wes for years but I thought he disappeared a little bit up his own arsehole in his last few movies (Asteroid City and French Dispatch). This is a quirky story quirkily told, Ben Kingsley and Benedict Cumberbatch both seem to be having fun, and the shorter runtime actually felt like a pretty good antidote to Wes fatigue. Would recommend everyone to give it a watch, could even be a gateway Wes movie for some due to the runtime, which largely flies by, though a few meta-heavy monologues drag out a tad too much.
Preach, brother!
 
Elemental
Pixar don't often miss and I really enjoyed this, especially as I felt I could relate to it quite a lot. Loved the animation too. Would have been a classic if the story was deeper and more layered 7.5/10

The Moor

A woman is approached by the father of her missing childhood friend to go help him look in the haunted Yorkshire Moors where he believes his son is. My short film supported this at a film festival and I am so glad I went to it. Absolutely loved this slow burn, folk horror that relies so much on creating a tense atmosphere rather than rely on gore and such. A couple of jump scares could have been left out and it would have still remained as effective but I genuinely think this is one of the best horror films I've seen this year. Keep an eye out for it when it gets a wide release. Well worth your time 8/10
 
I watched The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar, Wes Anderson's first Roald Dahl short (40 minutes) for Netflix, and found it delightful. I've been a fan of Wes for years but I thought he disappeared a little bit up his own arsehole in his last few movies (Asteroid City and French Dispatch). This is a quirky story quirkily told, Ben Kingsley and Benedict Cumberbatch both seem to be having fun, and the shorter runtime actually felt like a pretty good antidote to Wes fatigue. Would recommend everyone to give it a watch, could even be a gateway Wes movie for some due to the runtime, which largely flies by, though a few meta-heavy monologues drag out a tad too much.
There's four of those now, also The Rat Catcher, Poison, and The Swan (all 17 min). I look forward to watching them!

I wonder if there will be more, I thought it was just three just yesterday...?
 
There's four of those now, also The Rat Catcher, Poison, and The Swan (all 17 min). I look forward to watching them!

I wonder if there will be more, I thought it was just three just yesterday...?
I think four was the plan so if they're all there now, that should be it. I was also surprised by how quickly they dropped.
 
I watched The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar, Wes Anderson's first Roald Dahl short (40 minutes) for Netflix, and found it delightful. I've been a fan of Wes for years but I thought he disappeared a little bit up his own arsehole in his last few movies (Asteroid City and French Dispatch). This is a quirky story quirkily told, Ben Kingsley and Benedict Cumberbatch both seem to be having fun, and the shorter runtime actually felt like a pretty good antidote to Wes fatigue. Would recommend everyone to give it a watch, could even be a gateway Wes movie for some due to the runtime, which largely flies by, though a few meta-heavy monologues drag out a tad too much.
Watched it last night and really enjoyed it. I think being constrained by someone else's story has really helped Anderson keep focus with this one.
 
I watched The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar, Wes Anderson's first Roald Dahl short (40 minutes) for Netflix, and found it delightful. I've been a fan of Wes for years but I thought he disappeared a little bit up his own arsehole in his last few movies (Asteroid City and French Dispatch). This is a quirky story quirkily told, Ben Kingsley and Benedict Cumberbatch both seem to be having fun, and the shorter runtime actually felt like a pretty good antidote to Wes fatigue. Would recommend everyone to give it a watch, could even be a gateway Wes movie for some due to the runtime, which largely flies by, though a few meta-heavy monologues drag out a tad too much.
Yeah, it's the best thing that he's done in a long time.
 
“Poor Things”

A picaresque, retro-futurist Frankenstein-type fantasy following the moral and sexual development of Emma Stone’s adult implanted with a child’s brain. Strangely enough the human interactions are less strange than in many of Lanthimos’s films, even while barking chickens and dog-geese are wandering around the house. Slightly too long (the Paris brothel scenes could have been shortened even if fans of Stone will appreciate it) but visually arresting with a strong performance from Stone and Mark Ruffalo channeling the spirit of Terry Thomas. 9/10

“Priscilla”

Sofia Coppola’s biopic of the schoolgirl taken away by Elvis from her family life on a US army base to Graceland. Good job the King passed away long before Operation YewTree (although the film makes it clear that it was a curiously asexual relationship for much of the time). No one conveys better than Coppola that sense of dull confinement and loneliness. The trouble is that it’s not always so entertaining to see it acted it out on screen. 7/10
 
Saw X
Watched it today and I must say, this is the best one since the first two. I honestly feel that if this was released between 1 and 2, it would have been so much better as the premise of the film focuses on John Kramer trying to get treatment for his cancer but anyone who has seen past the first 2 films will already know the outcome, so it feels a bit pointless. I still had fun with it though 6.5/10
 
Just watched Schindler's List for the first time. Had always been put off watching it because I thought I knew what to expect but finally decided to do it tonight and it was far more graphic and emotional than I expected.

You can always find some flaws in any movie but I didn't see too many. And the epilogue I didn't see coming at all that was unforgettable.
 
“Poor Things”

A picaresque, retro-futurist Frankenstein-type fantasy following the moral and sexual development of Emma Stone’s adult implanted with a child’s brain. Strangely enough the human interactions are less strange than in many of Lanthimos’s films, even while barking chickens and dog-geese are wandering around the house. Slightly too long (the Paris brothel scenes could have been shortened even if fans of Stone will appreciate it) but visually arresting with a strong performance from Stone and Mark Ruffalo channeling the spirit of Terry Thomas. 9/10

“Priscilla”

Sofia Coppola’s biopic of the schoolgirl taken away by Elvis from her family life on a US army base to Graceland. Good job the King passed away long before Operation YewTree (although the film makes it clear that it was a curiously asexual relationship for much of the time). No one conveys better than Coppola that sense of dull confinement and loneliness. The trouble is that it’s not always so entertaining to see it acted it out on screen. 7/10
How graphic is the nudity in Poor Things? I read something that made it sound quasi-pornographic. I love Emma Stone and I’m not really stoked on this career volte face.
 
Just watched Schindler's List for the first time. Had always been put off watching it because I thought I knew what to expect but finally decided to do it tonight and it was far more graphic and emotional than I expected.

You can always find some flaws in any movie but I didn't see too many. And the epilogue I didn't see coming at all that was unforgettable.
Ralph Fiennes was superb. I’m not a big fan 0f this film but his performance was riveting.
 
Saw X
Watched it today and I must say, this is the best one since the first two. I honestly feel that if this was released between 1 and 2, it would have been so much better as the premise of the film focuses on John Kramer trying to get treatment for his cancer but anyone who has seen past the first 2 films will already know the outcome, so it feels a bit pointless. I still had fun with it though 6.5/10
Do we need to watch this to be able to understand your Werewolf game this weekend?
 
Just watched Schindler's List for the first time. Had always been put off watching it because I thought I knew what to expect but finally decided to do it tonight and it was far more graphic and emotional than I expected.

You can always find some flaws in any movie but I didn't see too many. And the epilogue I didn't see coming at all that was unforgettable.
Just don't make out during it.