Film The Redcafe Movie review thread

Wicked
Been avoiding this as I couldn't imagine how it would compare well against the west end play but my daughter kept asking so we went. She loved it and so did I. Great sets, performances, musical numbers... Everything was on point. The scene in the disco pulled at the heart strings even more than in the play and loved the way they did the finale. Just hoped it would be 20 minutes shorter and I'm curious to see how they tackle the second film but on its own, this was fantastic 8/10
Agreed.

It’s tough making a film where people have a clear preconception of how they think it should be (especially when SO loved and SO famous) and I think they managed to replicate all the good bits but add to it in scenes like the disco/Uni grounds/class/Oz with much bigger settings (which films have the advantage to do).
 
I can’t believe the way you’re distancing yourself from me after all the supportive PM’s you sent me about that post.
The dick pics were just too much.
Tbf Baker has won a ton of awards for this film(It’s got 94% on RT) and it’s also done well at the box office. It’s almost universally loved.

The review I posted is one of the few with a different view(One of the reasons I put in this thread).
You posted it and said “brilliant review” without elaborating on why you thought it was. Not sure why you would not expect people to react to that about a film that, as you say, is almost universally liked.
 
A Man Called Otto. A 2022 comedy drama (with emphasis on the drama; it takes a while for the upbeat parts to show up) where Tom Hanks plays a grumpy, bitter guy who is done with life, but gets drawn back in by new neighbours (especially a woman played by Mariana Treviño) and ensuing circumstances. The sentimentality is laid on rather thickly, but it's enjoyable enough and works well. 6/10
Have you seen the original version of this, the Swedish film A Man Called Ove? We watched Ove and liked it, and then tried watching this one with Hanks, and he just can't help being Tom Hanks. Bleh/10
I watched a q&a with Sean Baker after the screening of Anora I went to.

He apparently consulted very widely with sex workers, interviewed sex workers, and had on-set consultants throughout filming. In his own words, he made yet another film about sex workers because he “wasn’t seeing any films being made about sex work”. I take this to mean he’s generally disappointed by the lack of representation.

He specifically said in the interview that Anora is not attempting to wholly capture the experience of all sex workers. He attempted to tell an acute, concentrated story about the experience of just one sex worker. From what I gather, he tried his level best to educate and entertain in equal measure. He clearly cares deeply about the subject matter.

The experiences of sex workers are not uniform. Fairly harsh to accuse him of failing to capture the nuances felt by all sex workers all the time. I get the thrust of that review, but can our audiences and critics not be a little charitable?
I have been hiring sex workers for the past few weeks, between training to be a fighter pilot, so that I can properly enjoy Anora. Waiting to hear back if I got accepted into Top Gun or Red Flag.
Wicked
Been avoiding this as I couldn't imagine how it would compare well against the west end play but my daughter kept asking so we went. She loved it and so did I. Great sets, performances, musical numbers... Everything was on point. The scene in the disco pulled at the heart strings even more than in the play and loved the way they did the finale. Just hoped it would be 20 minutes shorter and I'm curious to see how they tackle the second film but on its own, this was fantastic 8/10
Is this a cry for help?
 
KNEECAP (2024)
Kneecap_poster.jpg

Some credit for the verisimilitude because at the end of this film I still didn't know if Kneecap were a real hip hop duo or just something in this film. All 3 members of the band (?) were very believable as themselves, but also as actors. It's not like Lady Gaga dropping big fat cinematic turds. Anyway, I hate hip hop but I liked this movie. Interesting flippancy with regards to the Troubles. Some very dark gallows humor. I spent a few days in Belfast and I've never recovered from it. Car bombs and buildings blowing up played for laughs is a bold move (Cotton).

Always enjoy the views of quotidian life in places like Belfast. How accurate is any of this? Row houses give me the creeps. The girl Georgia was fit but my wife made us fast forward over the humping scenes because of the wee bairns also watching. Overall this was well done, funny, entertaining, lively. Irish is an impossible language.

8/10
 
Have you seen the original version of this, the Swedish film A Man Called Ove? We watched Ove and liked it, and then tried watching this one with Hanks, and he just can't help being Tom Hanks. Bleh/10
I know it exists, but no, I haven't seen it and don't have access to it. But I anyway like Tom Hanks.
 
KNEECAP (2024)
Kneecap_poster.jpg

Some credit for the verisimilitude because at the end of this film I still didn't know if Kneecap were a real hip hop duo or just something in this film. All 3 members of the band (?) were very believable as themselves, but also as actors. It's not like Lady Gaga dropping big fat cinematic turds. Anyway, I hate hip hop but I liked this movie. Interesting flippancy with regards to the Troubles. Some very dark gallows humor. I spent a few days in Belfast and I've never recovered from it. Car bombs and buildings blowing up played for laughs is a bold move (Cotton).

Always enjoy the views of quotidian life in places like Belfast. How accurate is any of this? Row houses give me the creeps. The girl Georgia was fit but my wife made us fast forward over the humping scenes because of the wee bairns also watching. Overall this was well done, funny, entertaining, lively. Irish is an impossible language.

8/10
Real and (as you say) they play themselves in the film.
 
Wicked
Been avoiding this as I couldn't imagine how it would compare well against the west end play but my daughter kept asking so vwe went. She loved it and so did I. Great sets, performances, musical numbers... Everything was on point. The scene in the disco pulled at the heart strings even more than in the play and loved the way they did the finale. Just hoped it would be 20 minutes shorter and I'm curious to see how they tackle the second film but on its own, this was fantastic 8/10
I almost always either love or hate musicals, nothing inbetween, yet something about this one puts me off. I'm not sure if it is Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande playing (or being) simpering besties for the camera all over the place, or just because it is another fecking Wizard of Oz universe bleed them dry film. And how the feck do you make a stage show into 2 films?
 
Waiting for Dali (2023).
Watched this the other night not expecting much but I ended up loving it. Cracking scenery too in the Cadaques area of northern Catalonia, where Dali had a house. Give it a watch especially when you're in need of something not too taxing.

It's mostly in Spanish with subtitles available if that's important.

8.5/10.
 
Last edited:
I almost always either love or hate musicals, nothing inbetween, yet something about this one puts me off. I'm not sure if it is Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande playing (or being) simpering besties for the camera all over the place, or just because it is another fecking Wizard of Oz universe bleed them dry film. And how the feck do you make a stage show into 2 films?
This was me before watching the film. Have to admit, they were both excellent.

Also, the film focuses on a lot more characterization, hence why it's split.
 
My Old Ass
About a girl about to go to college who inexplicably meets her 39-year-old self.
Ending was kind of predictable but still hit me like a ton of bricks. 8/10
 
I’ve only seen a couple of his works.

First was his remake of Suspria which I’ve come round to liking more. At first I wasn’t into draining Suspria of all its colour(Although I understand it’s a good way to separate itself from the original) but 70’s West German was a great setting and showing an American crying at the mention of free rent was a beautiful way to open.

It definitely more of witch film than the original which was nice and so are close ups of faces. Tbh overall the body horror is pretty excellent(Although minus point for cgi blood!). I’ve got to say Guadagnino is great at filming the movements of bodies.

It definitely captures the paranoia and guilt vibe of a society which contains people who have horrific pasts. Although I don’t know if it says more than that. Also to the film credit it’s full of beautiful naked women but it never comes across as sexual or vulgar which speaks to Guadagnino as a director.

More recently Mubi added Guadagnino first movie The Protagonists. I really enjoyed it. Crime thriller but shot almost as a tv documentary. Guadagnino nails 90’s London and the film has the energy of someone first work as he is chucking everything at the screen.

I’ve also watched a short film he did called - The Staggering Girl which had a great cast of Julianne Moore, Kyle MacLachlan).
I really like Suspiria, I feel it's a bit of a blueprint of how a remake should be made to have some value - I feel like Guadagnino really understood Argento's film but rather than trying to modernize it or just remake it in a similar manner, he takes the essence of it and makes a truly personal version of it. It's a really great film.

I would recommend watching:
- A bigger splash is a cool film, with notably Ralph Fiennes seemingly having the time of his life on screen, and Tilda Swinton being as always wonderful; I like how music and food are totally at the heart of several scenes (there's a great moment where Fiennes's character dances through the house listening to a Stones song), it's a really enjoyable one I'll watch from time to time and never get bored of
- Call me by your name is a lovely coming of age film with a genuine love story at the heart of it; Chalamet was 21-22 when he filmed this and brings great depth to his character struggling with his emotions and sexuality, and there's true heart and kindness throughout the film (I love the father character and some of his interactions with his son, Michael Stuhlbarg is wonderful in it)
- I really enjoyed Bones and all and thought it was a bit of a fresh take on the vampire genre, with again lots of sensitivity; its retro-feel is also quite nice, but I think this one might have been more divisive (I don't know so many people who have seen it and liked it to be honest)
Brilliant review(Includes spoilers)of Anora -

https://angelfoodmag.com/romance-labor
The conversation took a weird tone after you posted it but yeah that was a very good review that went in-depth about why that person didn't like it, and gave an interesting perspective.
until you read that “review”

hey listen, if Sweet Square can embody the mind and thoughts of a real life sex worker and writer when watching a movie then fair play!

Anyway, I wouldn't call it a brilliant review at all. Ok, fine, the movie doesn't do enough to highlight the challenges sex workers face in the US, but it's also not trying to? It feels a harsh criticism to label at it. I can understand why the reviewer is writing it as it's probably the most attention a film with a sex worker has gotten in a very long time, but it seems to be arguing against the film for no good reason. I thought the film had a pretty simple point which was that we should be very careful of objectifying these young women because they have feelings and emotions and can get hurt just like like the rest of us.
The dick pics were just too much.

You posted it and said “brilliant review” without elaborating on why you thought it was. Not sure why you would not expect people to react to that about a film that, as you say, is almost universally liked.
I mean, it really did and Sean Baker seems to have been quite vocal on it - sure, it gives the perspective of one story on it, but also dedicated his prizes to "all sex workers", and had lots of consultants on set. I think it's entirely fair-game for one person involved in that industry to share why they felt the characterization was flawed, it's her subjective perception of the film. But considering the film has been marketed as a "modern day Pretty Woman" and the fact sex-work is at the heart of the film, it's a very interesting perspective. What she writes about the whole conclusion of the film in particular was something that had really disturbed me at the time of seeing it without necessarily being able to verbalise it. Her piece is well written and well thought-out. I personally thought it was a good film when I saw it a couple of months ago, then having discussed it with some friends and one of my brothers, I've realised I was more annoyed by it than I initially thought, and this latest piece is an interesting addition to my perception of it - it doesn't change that it's overall well acted, but it does elaborate on the social messaging that has been praised by a lot of critics (who, I would assume, have little insight about that industry).

Also, as to your initial message ("I don't believe any of that entered your mind before reading it" or whatever it was) - I never read reviews before seeing a film but I might do so after seeing one, if it was thought provoking, if I'm left confused, or if I'm just curious about what's being said about it. And sometimes, a review might cristalize certain things that might have been playing in the back of my mind, but that I wouldn't necessarily know how to put in words. I'm not saying that's what happened for Sweet Square and Anora as most of it is quite specific to sex workers, but there's also a big part of that review (like everything bout the conclusion of the film, notably) that isn't particularly about the sex working industry, just the film and its narrative.

The fact he posted it here and said "brilliant review" seems to have really bothered you for some reason, it's a generally well received film and it's a genuinely really well written review that gives a different view on it - even if it had been one of my favourite films of the year, I'd still be able to recognize that it's a great review.
My Old Ass
About a girl about to go to college who inexplicably meets her 39-year-old self.
Ending was kind of predictable but still hit me like a ton of bricks. 8/10
I started watching this a couple of months ago with a friend, being very drunk, and never finished it - I really like Aubrey Plaza and it seemed mildly interesting so I should probably get back to it sometime!
 
I never read reviews before seeing a film but I might do so after seeing one, if it was thought provoking, if I'm left confused, or if I'm just curious about what's being said about it. And sometimes, a review might cristalize certain things that might have been playing in the back of my mind, but that I wouldn't necessarily know how to put in words.
I always do this if I found the film interesting enough. I tend to learn a lot from those, even if I disagree entirely with the review. I actually wish there were 'previews' that point out themes and cinematographic elements to look for in a film; cause I often find I missed things (I guess I'm a bit of a superficial watcher), and then I'd kinda want to check specific scenes or the entire film again - but I find it hard enough to find time to watch films and there is so much to see, that I virtually never actually go back to anything.
 
Enter the Fat Dragon (2020)
Hong Kong cop with a way out of his league actress GF gets in trouble in his police department and to make amends is sent to do what should be an easy job escorting an extradited prisoner back to Japan.
Some funny kung fu scenes but overall I found it so silly that it annoyed me.
The only redeeming thing for me was the actress Niki Chow that plays the GF. She was probably close to 40 years old when she made this :drool:

2/10.
 
I Saw The TV Glow (2024)

You saw this @Dirty Schwein , didn’t you? Why was this listed as a horror film? I was expecting basically a hybrid of Videodrome and The Ring.

That is not the movie you get.

To discuss this movie is to spoil it, so:
It took me until about 4/5 of the way through it to finally get the metaphor. I think once you accept that they aren’t going to turn this into a horror film, you can appreciate it for what it is.

The protagonist is a shy and awkward (ASD) 7th grade boy when we meet him, who befriends some older girls who are obsessed with a Buffy the Vampire Slayer type of tv show. In the show, 2 girls share a psychic link and help each other fight cheesy monsters. His friend comes out as lesbian, and talks about wanting to leave the town before it kills them. Eventually they run away and the protagonist goes through his life, 10, 20, 40 (?) years later. He is never fully alive and is wasting his life being boring. His friend returns after 10 years and tells him the tv show they were watching is real and that they are the two girls in the show (essentially):

In a nutshell, it’s a coming out/ transgender story told through the device of teenagers believing they are dying and being suffocated from being buried alive, and that their real self is beautiful and powerful and somewhere else living a better life. As you would, if you were trapped inside the wrong body and hiding your true self.

That said, this didn’t feel like a movie. It felt more like a stage play or a one-woman-show, with breaking the 4th wall, long stylized speeches, and a plot so thin as to not be there at all. There were some great images, great scene composition, great use of pop music, and some interesting acting. The leads were very good. But It felt like something that would be performed at a college art event, a dramatization of an essay.

This movie made me think about a lot of things, not just reliving high school years, but certain truths said in the film are truths outside of it as well. They expressed the central premise in a way that helps you “understand” it viscerally. If that was their sole objective, they nailed it.

This is about the furthest you can get from a horror/thriller, which is I think how they were billing it.

Rating in terms of what I thought I was going to watch = 3/10.
In terms of what they intended = 8/10.
 
Last edited:
I Saw The TV Glow (2024)

You saw this @Dirty Schwein , didn’t you? Why was this listed as a horror film? I was expecting basically a hybrid of Videodrome and The Ring.

That is not the movie you get.

To discuss this movie is to spoil it, so:
It took me until about 4/5 of the way through it to finally get the metaphor. I think once you accept that they aren’t going to turn this into a horror film, you can appreciate it for what it is.

The protagonist is a shy and awkward (ASD) 7th grade boy when we meet him, who befriends some older girls who are obsessed with a Buffy the Vampire Slayer type of tv show. In the show, 2 girls share a psychic link and help each other fight cheesy monsters. His friend comes out as lesbian, and talks about wanting to leave the town before it kills them. Eventually they run away and the protagonist goes through his life, 10, 20, 40 (?) years later. He is never fully alive and is wasting his life being boring. His friend returns after 10 years and tells him the tv show they were watching is real and that they are the two girls in the show (essentially):

In a nutshell, it’s a coming out/ transgender story told through the device of teenagers believing they are dying and being suffocated from being buried alive, and that their real self is beautiful and powerful and somewhere else living a better life. As you would, if you were trapped inside the wrong body and hiding your true self.

That said, this didn’t feel like a movie. It felt more like a stage play or a one-woman-show, with breaking the 4th wall, long stylized speeches, and a plot so thin as to not be there at all. There were some great images, great scene composition, great use of pop music, and some interesting acting. The leads were very good. But It felt like something that would be performed at a college art event, a dramatization of an essay.

This movie made me think about a lot of things, not just reliving high school years, but certain truths said in the film are truths outside of it as well. They expressed the central premise in a way that helps you “understand” it viscerally. If that was their sole objective, they nailed it.

This is about the furthest you can get from a horror/thriller, which is I think how they were billing it.

Rating in terms of what I thought I was going to watch = 3/10.
In terms of what they intended = 8/10.
Maybe DS is a closet ultra-conservative? Reads like a horror movie in that case.
 
Maybe DS is a closet ultra-conservative? Reads like a horror movie in that case.
This would probably have made a ripping short film. As a feature, it’s pretty sleep-inducing. Definitely conservatives will be having nightmares over this. DS lived this film as wolf in sheep’s clothing/conservative in progressive clothing.

Did you ever get around to watching Romulus?
 
I Saw The TV Glow (2024)

You saw this @Dirty Schwein , didn’t you? Why was this listed as a horror film? I was expecting basically a hybrid of Videodrome and The Ring.

That is not the movie you get.

To discuss this movie is to spoil it, so:
It took me until about 4/5 of the way through it to finally get the metaphor. I think once you accept that they aren’t going to turn this into a horror film, you can appreciate it for what it is.

The protagonist is a shy and awkward (ASD) 7th grade boy when we meet him, who befriends some older girls who are obsessed with a Buffy the Vampire Slayer type of tv show. In the show, 2 girls share a psychic link and help each other fight cheesy monsters. His friend comes out as lesbian, and talks about wanting to leave the town before it kills them. Eventually they run away and the protagonist goes through his life, 10, 20, 40 (?) years later. He is never fully alive and is wasting his life being boring. His friend returns after 10 years and tells him the tv show they were watching is real and that they are the two girls in the show (essentially):

In a nutshell, it’s a coming out/ transgender story told through the device of teenagers believing they are dying and being suffocated from being buried alive, and that their real self is beautiful and powerful and somewhere else living a better life. As you would, if you were trapped inside the wrong body and hiding your true self.

That said, this didn’t feel like a movie. It felt more like a stage play or a one-woman-show, with breaking the 4th wall, long stylized speeches, and a plot so thin as to not be there at all. There were some great images, great scene composition, great use of pop music, and some interesting acting. The leads were very good. But It felt like something that would be performed at a college art event, a dramatization of an essay.

This movie made me think about a lot of things, not just reliving high school years, but certain truths said in the film are truths outside of it as well. They expressed the central premise in a way that helps you “understand” it viscerally. If that was their sole objective, they nailed it.

This is about the furthest you can get from a horror/thriller, which is I think how they were billing it.

Rating in terms of what I thought I was going to watch = 3/10.
In terms of what they intended = 8/10.
Yeah, seen this. I also don't think it's horror despite there being some horrific moments. I guess it's easier to market to horror fans as we're fiends that lap up anything. The same was done with the directors previous film "We're All Going to the World's Fair".

I felt similar to you. It wasn't what I was hoping for/expecting but still a powerful piece overall.
 
This would probably have made a ripping short film. As a feature, it’s pretty sleep-inducing.

Did you ever get around to watching Romulus?
No, unfortunately haven't got the time / power left in the evening to watch any movie or even show atm - and don't want to watch it in two or more sittings. But I'll certainly do ! I even enjoyed Prometheus for what it is. :nervous:
 
Yeah, seen this. I also don't think it's horror despite there being some horrific moments. I guess it's easier to market to horror fans as we're fiends that lap up anything. The same was done with the directors previous film "We're All Going to the World's Fair".

I felt similar to you. It wasn't what I was hoping for/expecting but still a powerful piece overall.
I still would like to see the movie I thought I was going to watch. It needs to be a David Cronenberg/John Carpenter type of film.
I know you didn't ask me, but I liked it. If you're talking about the Alien movie. Ash was silly though
I have no idea why they did that (Ash). So many visual things tie it into the Alien universe. Or if they were insisting on a cameo, why milk a cameo of a dead actor (is he dead?)? I would like to see someone make an Alien movie that is pure horror. I want to see a scary space movie, not fun video game inspired space films.
No, unfortunately haven't got the time / power left in the evening to watch any movie or even show atm - and don't want to watch it in two or more sittings. But I'll certainly do ! I even enjoyed Prometheus for what it is. :nervous:
If you liked Prometheus you will adore this one, for reals. I’m still receiving therapy to forget about the turd that was Prometheus. It will take years.
 
If you liked Prometheus you will adore this one, for reals. I’m still receiving therapy to forget about the turd that was Prometheus. It will take years.
I ignore the whole crew and focus solely on the slow discovery of the scenery + I like Michael Fassbender in it. I also like the design of those white giants in contrast to the alien. Wouldn't watch it again though. I can set my bars low as you can see.

That being said, I'm also not a huge fan of Aliens. Alien is where it's at for me so Romulus sounds like an excellent balance. I also love the first Terminator movie and wouldn't really watch the second one anymore (although it's an impressive / iconic action-entertainment flic, no debate).
 
I ignore the whole crew and focus solely on the slow discovery of the scenery + I like Michael Fassbender in it. I also like the design of those white giants in contrast to the alien. Wouldn't watch it again though. I can set my bars low as you can see.

That being said, I'm also not a huge fan of Aliens. Alien is where it's at for me so Romulus sounds like an excellent balance. I also love the first Terminator movie and wouldn't really watch the second one anymore (although it's an impressive / iconic action-entertainment flic, no debate).
Maybe I'll rewatch it with the sound off. Put on some Mogwai and give it a watch. Fassbender was far and away the best thing about it.

I like that guy who does review videos where he's playing both an executive and a guy pitching an idea. Kinda took the words outta my mouth:
 
Every couple of months, Prometheus comes up on here and, eventually, I'm going to end up watching it again thinking "Nah, it can't have been THAT bad, can it? I should give it another shot". But it is that bad, and it'll upset me all over again. This is my fate.
 
Every couple of months, Prometheus comes up on here and, eventually, I'm going to end up watching it again thinking "Nah, it can't have been THAT bad, can it? I should give it another shot". But it is that bad, and it'll upset me all over again. This is my fate.
Embrace your fate like I do.
 
Finally saw Longlegs. Not sure how to rate it; atmosphere and tension was spot on but the actual story was just meaningless.
 
Every couple of months, Prometheus comes up on here and, eventually, I'm going to end up watching it again thinking "Nah, it can't have been THAT bad, can it? I should give it another shot". But it is that bad, and it'll upset me all over again. This is my fate.
prometheus-run_huaa070675b71a090c28c1e1adc56b69f5_606483_1200x1200_fit_lanczos_3.png
 
Every couple of months, Prometheus comes up on here and, eventually, I'm going to end up watching it again thinking "Nah, it can't have been THAT bad, can it? I should give it another shot". But it is that bad, and it'll upset me all over again. This is my fate.

it actually gets worse on the second watch though

now it suffers from not being being awful but also terribly dated for a film that old
 
The Northman (2022)
Attempt #2.
I skipped ahead until Amleth was all growed up. It’s Hamlet-adjacent, doesn’t have all the background machinations (Ophelia, Rosencranz, Polonius, et al) but retains the basic son-avenges-father-slain-by-his-uncle through line. Main actors (Skarsgard, Taylor-Joy, Claes Bang) were all really good. I’ve warmed up to Taylor-Joy.

Some striking imagery, beautifully composed shots, and the stylized scenes with Björk, Valhalla, etc., were stunning too.

Kidman was awful in this. It’s all the work or Botox she’s had done but her face almost appears CGI. There’s one scene where she’s in profile talking to Amleth and her upper lip doesn’t even budge during the entire conversation, like she’s a ventriloquist’s dummy. Beyond that, she's never been able to emote or get near any emotion recognizable as human. She's stiff and unconvincing.

It reminded me of a Marcus Nispel kind of joint: intense , epic visuals, but the story could be written on a matchbook cover. Eggers is talented and I appreciate the extra lengths he goes to in his movies, but he neeeds a better casting director. Hawke and Kidman must have been favors he owed someone. Replace Kidman with Rebecca Ferguson, and you’ve got a winner.

7/10
 
Last edited:
The Northman (2022)
Attempt #2.
I skipped ahead until Amleth was all growed up. It’s Hamlet-adjacent, doesn’t have all the background machinations (Ophelia, Rosencranz, Polonius, et al) but retains the basic son-avenges-father-slain-by-his-uncle through line. Main actors (Skarsgard, Taylor-Joy, Claes Bang) were all really good. I’ve warmed up to Taylor-Joy.

Some striking imagery, beautifully composed shots, and the stylized scenes with Björk, Valhalla, etc., were stunning too.

Kidman who was awful in this. It’s all the work or Botox she’s had done but her face almost appears CGI. There’s one scene where she’s in profile talking to Amleth and her upper lip doesn’t even budge during the entire conversation, like she’s a ventriloquist’s dummy.

It reminded me of a Marcus Nispel kind of joint: intense , epic visuals, but the story could be written on a matchbook cover. Eggers is talented and I appreciate the extra lengths he goes to in his movies, but he neeeds a better casting director. Hawke and Kidman must have been favors he owed someone. Replace Kidman with Rebecca Ferguson, and you’ve got a winner.

7/10
My wife was constantly distracted when she was on the screen in Lioness. First series it was the bizarre size, shape and immobility of her lips and in series 2 it was assessing the change (more back to normal but far from normal).
 
@Wibble , you hate Yorgos Lanthimos as much as I do, but do you then give up on his future movies or give him the benefit of the doubt? Just seeing Kinds Of Kindness is available to stream, and I hadn’t heard much about it. 165 minutes is like watching two Yorgos movies back to back.
 
Finally saw Longlegs. Not sure how to rate it; atmosphere and tension was spot on but the actual story was just meaningless.
Trailer looks dope, like a True Detective story. Is it scary? Trailer looks to have a shit ton of jump scares and REALLY LOUD SOUND FX, both of which I really don’t like. Looks like they are trying to jazz up a slow burn story. Is it more procedural or horror film-y? Kind of like Prisoners?
 
@Wibble , you hate Yorgos Lanthimos as much as I do, but do you then give up on his future movies or give him the benefit of the doubt? Just seeing Kinds Of Kindness is available to stream, and I hadn’t heard much about it. 165 minutes is like watching two Yorgos movies back to back.
I suspect it is actually 3 short Yorgos movies back to back. For some reason I keep getting tempted back, and then regret it, but this one might well be the exception i.e. just give it a miss. Let me know what you think.
 
I suspect it is actually 3 short Yorgos movies back to back. For some reason I keep getting tempted back, and then regret it, but this one might well be the exception i.e. just give it a miss. Let me know what you think.
No way, bub: you first!
I think what was happening for me was enjoying Emma Stone specifically and not so much what she was doing in the film. But as you may have gathered, I hate a lot of movies, actors, and directors. I keep getting suckered in by Tarantino even though I haven’t liked anything he’s done since Pulp Fixtion, I keep thinking this one will be great and will give me that dopamine rush — but it’s like chasing the dragon.
 
No way, bub: you first!
I think what was happening for me was enjoying Emma Stone specifically and not so much what she was doing in the film. But as you may have gathered, I hate a lot of movies, actors, and directors. I keep getting suckered in by Tarantino even though I haven’t liked anything he’s done since Pulp Fixtion, I keep thinking this one will be great and will give me that dopamine rush — but it’s like chasing the dragon.
I didn't mind Kill Bill and I really liked Inglorious Basterds but everything else since Pulp Fiction has been a bit meh. His first two films were great so I keep going back for ever reducing returns.
 
I didn't mind Kill Bill and I really liked Inglorious Basterds but everything else since Pulp Fiction has been a bit meh. His first two films were great so I keep going back for ever reducing returns.
Same, except I hated inglorious Bastrrds. Kill Bill could have been a terrific 2.5 hour movie, trim the fat on it and it probably is a ripping movie. Over two movies it’s like Tarantino jerking off onto the camera lens.
 
Same, except I hated inglorious Bastrrds. Kill Bill could have been a terrific 2.5 hour movie, trim the fat on it and it probably is a ripping movie. Over two movies it’s like Tarantino jerking off onto the camera lens.
Agreed about Kill Bill - nowhere near enough plot for 2 films.
 
@Wibble , you hate Yorgos Lanthimos as much as I do, but do you then give up on his future movies or give him the benefit of the doubt? Just seeing Kinds Of Kindness is available to stream, and I hadn’t heard much about it. 165 minutes is like watching two Yorgos movies back to back.
I suspect it is actually 3 short Yorgos movies back to back. For some reason I keep getting tempted back, and then regret it, but this one might well be the exception i.e. just give it a miss. Let me know what you think.
No way, bub: you first!
I think what was happening for me was enjoying Emma Stone specifically and not so much what she was doing in the film. But as you may have gathered, I hate a lot of movies, actors, and directors. I keep getting suckered in by Tarantino even though I haven’t liked anything he’s done since Pulp Fixtion, I keep thinking this one will be great and will give me that dopamine rush — but it’s like chasing the dragon.
You two :lol:

Yeah it's three "shorts" (none of them being particularly short), but if you don't like Lanthimos's other stuff, I genuinely doubt there's a chance in hell you'd like this.
 
You two :lol:

Yeah it's three "shorts" (none of them being particularly short), but if you don't like Lanthimos's other stuff, I genuinely doubt there's a chance in hell you'd like this.
This movie is worth it for that scene in film 2. One of the biggest laughs of the year for me.